「콘텐츠산업 진흥법」 제27조 청약철회 조항에 대한 고찰
The Consideration on the 27th provision that provides cooling off in 「the Contents Industry Promotion Act」
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Contents Industry Size of Republic of Korea has been increased annually and the protection issue of consumer who uses contents is very important nowadays. The Contents Industry Promotion Act provides a cooling off system(the 27th article) but the Act applies the cooling off in ‘The Electronic Commerce Consumer Protection Act’ on this matter(Korean Government have only 3 cooling off legal system for the protection of consumer). The Contents Industry Promotion Act rules above general contents industry promotion(including on & off-line trades) so that the 27th article is not proper because the 27th article was originated from ‘the Online Digital Contents Industry Development Act’ which was transformed into The Contents Industry Promotion Act 5 years ago. Furthermore, contents business people have danger exposed to double restrictions for the 2 Acts. So it’s desirable to abolish the 27th article of the Contents Act and to make some new legal system part on digital goods & services in the Electronic Commerce Consumer Act. For the good contents environments, it is necessary to make ‘consumer dispute resolution guide on contents market’ and to study secure business certification system.
Abstract
The Contents Industry Size of Republic of Korea has been increased annually and the protection issue of consumer who uses contents is very important nowadays. The Contents Industry Promotion Act provides a cooling off system(the 27th article) but the Act applies the cooling off in ‘The Electronic Commerce Consumer Protection Act’ on this matter(Korean Government have only 3 cooling off legal system for the protection of consumer). The Contents Industry Promotion Act rules above general contents industry promotion(including on & off-line trades) so that the 27th article is not proper because the 27th article was originated from ‘the Online Digital Contents Industry Development Act’ which was transformed into The Contents Industry Promotion Act 5 years ago. Furthermore, contents business people have danger exposed to double restrictions for the 2 Acts. So it’s desirable to abolish the 27th article of the Contents Act and to make some new legal system part on digital goods & services in the Electronic Commerce Consumer Act. For the good contents environments, it is necessary to make ‘consumer dispute resolution guide on contents market’ and to study secure business certification system.
참고문헌 (14)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (1992), 박영사
- 김준호, "민법강의" (2005), 법문사
- 소비자계약관련입법의 체계화방안, "현대호", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2003)
- 김미혜, "소비자계약에 있어서 청약철회권의 통합에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2013
- 고형석, "특수거래에 있어서 소비자의 청약철회권에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (29), pp.323~361 (2005), 한국민사법학회
- 고형석, "소비자보호법상 청약철회권에 관한 연구", 선진상사법률연구, (48), pp.128~160 (2009), 법무부
- 구병문, "디지털콘텐츠 이용자의 청약철회와 그 제한규정의 문제점과 해결방안 - 온디콘법 제16조의2 및 제16조의4를 중심으로 -", 홍익법학, 10(1), pp.425~447 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김대규, "消費者撤回權의 統一的 規律方案에 관한 小考", 중앙법학, 6(3), pp.327~351 (2004), 중앙법학회
- 김판기, "소비자계약과 소비자보호", 한양법학, 18 (2005), 한양법학회
- 안성포, "소비자보호를 위한 독일의 전자통신판매법", 법학논총, 24(1) (2000), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 정진명, "온라인디지털콘텐츠 이용과 소비자보호 -“온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법” 개정의견을 중심으로-", 재산법연구, 26(3), pp.209~242 (2010), 한국재산법학회
- 최병록, "소비자계약에 관한 연구", 사회과학연구, 11 (1998), 서원대학교 사회과학연구소
- 한국콘텐츠진흥원, "콘텐츠분쟁조정사례집 (KOCCA 14-15)" (2014)
- 디지털콘텐츠 이용피해현황 및 경제적 피해규모 조사분석, "한국콘텐츠진흥원", KOCCA, ~, pp.KOCCA 연구보고서 11-34 (2011)
