집행증서에 기한 강제집행에 관한 검토
Compulsory Execution by Notarial Deed with Executory Force
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Article 56, Item 4 of Civil Execution Act provides that the Notarial Deed prepared by a notary public in respect of the claims aiming at the payment of specific amount, or at the payment of a specific quantity of substitute goods or securities, and which states the purport of giving a consent of the debtor to the compulsory execution be one of the execution titles. As such schuldtitel Notarial Deed with Executory Force(vollstreckbare Urkunde or exekutorische Urkunde) that bypasses the courts, creditors can make enforcement easy, so fast, but for the debtor to greater risk when compared with other schuldtitel should have. Notarial Deed with Executory Force is increasing its utilization. In this paper, expanded its coverage over recent legislation and compulsory execution proceedings, and wrote about its flaws and relief measures.
Abstract
The Article 56, Item 4 of Civil Execution Act provides that the Notarial Deed prepared by a notary public in respect of the claims aiming at the payment of specific amount, or at the payment of a specific quantity of substitute goods or securities, and which states the purport of giving a consent of the debtor to the compulsory execution be one of the execution titles. As such schuldtitel Notarial Deed with Executory Force(vollstreckbare Urkunde or exekutorische Urkunde) that bypasses the courts, creditors can make enforcement easy, so fast, but for the debtor to greater risk when compared with other schuldtitel should have. Notarial Deed with Executory Force is increasing its utilization. In this paper, expanded its coverage over recent legislation and compulsory execution proceedings, and wrote about its flaws and relief measures.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강대성, "민사집행법" (2002), 삼영사
- 김능환, "하자 있는 집행증서의 효력, 민사집행에 관한 제문제(상)", 재판자료, 71, pp.6~ (1996)
- 김동흠, "집행증서에 기한 강제집행절차에 관한 제문제", 사법연구자료, 15 (1988)
- 金尙永, "한국공증제도에 관한 연구 : 공증의 예방사법적 역할을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1995
- 김홍엽, "민사집행법" (2011), 박영사
- "2003", ~
- 오민석, "공증업무 확대 방안 지정토론문", 저스티스, (121), pp.12~ (2010), 한국법학원
- 이시윤, "신민사집행법" (2009), 박영사
- 이재성, "공정증서작성의 촉탁행위의 성질", 사법행정, 26(2) (1985)
- 장재형, "공증인의 직무상 의무로서의 중립성 -변호사의 쌍방소송대리 금지에 대한 재고찰과 더불어-", 인권과 정의, (410), pp.140~159 (2010), 대한변호사협회
- 장재형, "집행증서의 범위의 확대에 관한 실증적 분석과 검토 - 건물 등 부동산의 인도청구권에 관한 제소전화해와의 비교 분석을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (423), pp.81~100 (2012), 대한변호사협회
- 전병서, "집행증서의 대상범위의 확대", 법조, 56(12), pp.256~276 (2007), 법조협회
- 전병서, "공증법제의 새로운 전개" (2010), 중앙대학교 출판부
- 조상희, "집행증서의 하자와 신의칙", 민사소송, 15(1), pp.19~43 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- 三ヶ月章, "民事執行法" (1981), 弘文堂
- 松村和德, "民事執行救濟制度論", 成文堂 (1998)
- 中野貞一郞, "民事執行法" (2000), 靑林書院
- Jauernig, "Zwangsvollstreckungs-und Insolvenzrecht" (1999), C.H. Beck
- Lüke, "Zivilprozessrecht" (2006), C.H. Beck
- Münch, "Der Anwendungsbereich der Vollstreckungsunterwerfung-Zum neuen Recht der vollstreckbaren Urkunde" (1998), ZNotP
- Wolfsteiner, "Die vollstreckbare Urkunde" (2006), C. H. Beck