부패재산회복제도에 대한 비교법적 연구 -부패재산의몰수및회복에관한특례법을 중심으로-
A Comparative Study on Asset Recovery of Corruption Crime -Focused on the Legislation of Confiscation and Recovery of Asset from Corruption Crime-
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As closely and friendly the world became, as severe and important became the Corruption Crimes. Also quickly spread the problems and became international problems. At first, the necessity of regulation on the Corruption was needed because of its negative effects to the order and balance in One Nation. Also that meant loss of the enforcement power of nation. Now, as we are living in the global world, that is, living in one nation, the importance of the restriction unveiled. Without efforts and controls, above problems is going to be naturalized systematically. On 31 October, UN Convention against Corruption had an international effects and contained overcomes of corruption and improved clearness of public services. One of the important meanings of UN Conventions, is Asset Recovery that enables the corruption asset to be confiscated and charged more quickly and cooperated. In Korea, important contexts which contained in UN Conventions were in regulation systems and policies too. But the confiscation and additional collection of corruption asset around the world were not in above Conventions. So it is needed that regulation which contains the convention should be made legislation of confiscation and recovery of Asset from corruption crime. And the problems and improvements of them should be combined with comparative studies.
Abstract
As closely and friendly the world became, as severe and important became the Corruption Crimes. Also quickly spread the problems and became international problems. At first, the necessity of regulation on the Corruption was needed because of its negative effects to the order and balance in One Nation. Also that meant loss of the enforcement power of nation. Now, as we are living in the global world, that is, living in one nation, the importance of the restriction unveiled. Without efforts and controls, above problems is going to be naturalized systematically. On 31 October, UN Convention against Corruption had an international effects and contained overcomes of corruption and improved clearness of public services. One of the important meanings of UN Conventions, is Asset Recovery that enables the corruption asset to be confiscated and charged more quickly and cooperated. In Korea, important contexts which contained in UN Conventions were in regulation systems and policies too. But the confiscation and additional collection of corruption asset around the world were not in above Conventions. So it is needed that regulation which contains the convention should be made legislation of confiscation and recovery of Asset from corruption crime. And the problems and improvements of them should be combined with comparative studies.
참고문헌 (8)
- 윤동호, "국제사회의 반부패 동향과 한국의 부패방지시스템 진단" (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
- 민간부패방지를 위한 법제화방안 연구, "이천현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- 부패재산의 몰수 및 회복에 관한 특례법 및 동시행령 연구, "도중진", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 황성돈, "공무원을 위한 반부패 길라잡이" (2001), 국무조정실
- 김용세, "공직부패의 개념, 유형과 구조", 형사정책연구, 9(3) (1998)
- 장준오, "부패: 1980∼90년대 정경유착" (2001), 한국형사정책연구원
- 부패방지위원회, "부패방지백서" (2003)
- Inge Amundson, "Corruption-Definitions and Concepts" (2000), Chr. Michelson Institute
