본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

International Co-Operation and KOREAN Situation about Non-Conviction Based CONFISCATION

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The general tendency of contemporary Crime in the 21st century is transnational, intelligent, difficult to prove, related to much illicit money and collaborative among criminals especially in North East Asia. It is difficult to recover criminal assets in North East Asia not only because of the lack of the necessity recognition for the criminal asset recovery but also the limitation of the governance for the efficient mutual legal assistance in criminal matters including the incompletion of the legislation for the Asset Recovery. Non-Conviction Based Confiscation is also based on the completion of the legislation and the willingness for the substantial collaboration among the judicial organizations in Northeast Asian countries.

Abstract

The general tendency of contemporary Crime in the 21st century is transnational, intelligent, difficult to prove, related to much illicit money and collaborative among criminals especially in North East Asia. It is difficult to recover criminal assets in North East Asia not only because of the lack of the necessity recognition for the criminal asset recovery but also the limitation of the governance for the efficient mutual legal assistance in criminal matters including the incompletion of the legislation for the Asset Recovery. Non-Conviction Based Confiscation is also based on the completion of the legislation and the willingness for the substantial collaboration among the judicial organizations in Northeast Asian countries.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Jeong OS, "A Device on the Introduction of the Confiscation without Guilty-sen-tence", Prosecution Service, 46, pp.182~242 (2015)
  2. The Research and Legal Studies on the Policy and the Trends of Drug and Voice Phishing Crime Related to Korean in Northeast China, "Kim KC", Korean Institute of Criminology, ~ (2013)
  3. Park WS, "A Study on the Dark net Crime Phenomenon and Criminal Countermeasures", Prosecution Service, 58, pp.219~256 (2018)
  4. 김정환, "공무원범죄몰수법의 운영현황과 개선방향", 비교형사법연구, 20(3), pp.27~56 (2018), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
  5. 신호영, "범죄수익 몰수의 소득세 효과에 대한 연구", 안암법학, (50), pp.243~277 (2016), 안암법학회[DOI]
  6. Building Crime Prevention Sys-tem Utilizing Big Data, "Yoon HS", Korean Institute of Criminology, ~ (2015)
  7. 강지현, "몰수제도에 관한 비교연구 ― 개정 독일형법의 몰수규정에 관한 분석 ―", 법학논총, 38(3), pp.83~107 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
  8. 김민이, "조직범죄에 대한 형사제재로서의 범죄수익몰수", 법학논총, 25, pp.31~58 (2011), 법학연구소
  9. 노수환, "외국환거래법상 필요적 몰수·추징 규정에 관한 몇가지 고찰", 성균관법학, 29(2), pp.145~178 (2017), 법학연구원[DOI]
  10. 김희균, "민사몰수제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 19(1), pp.57~80 (2011), 한국피해자학회
  11. 김혜경, "형법개정안상 공소제기 없는 몰수의 해석과 집행절차에 관한 연구 - 법적 성격과 적용범위를 중심으로 -", 형사정책연구, 26(2), pp.59~94 (2015), 한국형사법무정책연구원
  12. 강민기, "몰수 대상 디지털 증거 압수․수색의 실무상 문제점과 개선방안", 경찰학연구, 18(1), pp.115~142 (2018), 경찰대학[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)