본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유전자검사의 유형에 따른 기관생명윤리심의위원회의 역할

The role of Institutional Bioethics Committees on the types of genetic testings

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the role and status of Institutional Bioethics Committee(IBC) in genetic testing institution(GTI). Its role has been defined as the review and oversight of activities of those institutions. Diverse genetic testings have raised various ethical issues and controversies. Genetic testings, in general, have been used to predict genes-related disease, to diagnosis and treat particular disease, and to identify genetic information of particular persons. And, genetic testings lead to ethical concerns on its potential harms and benefits by end or method of testing and impact of test result. Korean Bioethics and Safety Act takes measure in order to protect the person who provides specimen for genetic testings. The IBCs in GTIs are charged with the responsibility to protect research subjects and groups in their participation. But, there has been reports that some IBCs and their members are not appropriately trained for that. Therefore, this paper argues that the review of IBCs should be appropriated according to types of the genetic testings. And its members should be trained in order to meet those expectations. First of all, in the GTI which carry out the role of medical institution, its IBC should concentrate on proper content, process, and procedure of obtaining informed consent from the specimen provider. In particular, IBCs of GTI should assure that specimen provider understand the purpose and process of the tests and researches. Furthermore, IBCs in GTI should expect potential harms and benefits of testing due to inaccurate result and take appropriate measure in advance.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Clarke R, "Hyperhomocysteinemia : an independent risk factor for vascular disease", N Engl J Med, 324, pp.1149~1155 (1991)
  2. Kimura H, "The C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation in hemodialysis patients", J Am Soc Nephrol, 11, pp.885~893 (2000)
  3. Domenico P, "The effects of diet on DNA bulky adduct levels are strongly modified by GSTM1 genotype: a study on 634 subjects", Carcinogenesis, 25(4), pp.577~584 (2004)
  4. Nebert DW, "Human drug-metabolizing enzyme polymorphism effects on risk of toxicity and cancer", DNA Cell Biol, 15, pp.80~273 (1996)
  5. 김병수, "기관생명윤리심의위원회 심의표준화 및 운영 활성화 방안 연구 in :생명윤리정책연구센터 제3차년도 사업보고서"
  6. John I. Gallin, "Principles and practice of clinical research" (2007), Academic Press
  7. Hausman D., "Protecting Group from genetic research", Bioethics, 22(3), pp.157~165 (2008)
  8. 오수영, "산전유전진단 및 유전상담의 실제", Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50(6), pp.831~849 (2007), 대한산부인과학회
  9. 보건복지가족부, "기관생명윤리심의위원회 구성·운영 표준지침서" (2008)
  10. Nola M. Ries, "Nutrigenomics and Ethics Interface: Direct-to-Consumer Services and Commercial Aspects", Journal of Integrative Biology, 12(4), pp.245~250 (2008)
  11. 송인방, "보험에서 유전자차별의 법적 문제", 보험학회지, 70(70), pp.41~74 (2005), 한국보험학회
  12. 정규원, "유전자검사의 법적 문제", 법과사회, 24, pp.277~312 (2003), 법과사회이론학회
  13. "기관생윤리심의위원회 구성·운영 표준지침서", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)