사회여론 수렴방법으로서의 시민 합의회의:이종이식 문제를 중심으로
Citizen Consensus Conference as a way of Collecting Social Opinions on Xenotransplantation Issues
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The issues related to science and technology have been considered as an area in which only experts can make decisions due to its complexity and difficulty unlike in other fields of the society. However, the public character of science and technology gives direct effects on the life of the citizens and future generations and requires us to participate in policy making relevant to science and technology. The courses in which the citizens can participate in the decision-making process is various. In particular, the consensus conference has received a lot of attention in that it provides neutral information on a new science and technology and collects the considered opinion of the citizens. Furthermore, it is not limited to the specific area or subject but is open to induce a citizen’s consensus. The xenotransplantation which has ethical and social issues relevant to safety and has various potential requires the versatile consideration of a civic society and a scientific societies. The consensus conference on xenotransplantation was held from April to September in 2007, and total 14 civil panels discussed on various issues of xenotransplantation throughout 3 preparation meetings and 1 final conference. Although the necessity of research on xenotransplantation has received enough attention, civil panels expressed their concern that the relevant regulations should be prepared prior to the adoption of xenotransplantation. Lack of the interest of the society and government on xenotransplan-tation and the difficulty of civil panel selection has been pointed as the primary problem in the consensus conference. The consensus conference is one of the best methods to collect public opinions in that it provides correct information on a new biotechnology, induces civil consensus on the relevant social and ethical issues, and finally provides the direction for the future development.
참고문헌 (21)
- 이영희, "기술사회'에서의 참여민주주의의 가능성 연구-과학기술정책 관련 시민참여 모델 평가를 중심으로-", 동향과 전망, (53), pp.142~171 (2002), 한국사회과학연구회
- 이영희, "국가 과학기술정책의 형성과 시민참여: 생명공학규제입법과정을 증심으로", 동향과 전망, (56), pp.140~163 (2003), 한국사회과학연구회
- 허범, "공공정책의 형성과 집행 in :행정학개론" (1988), 대영문화사
- 이영희, "과학기술정책과 시민참여", 과학기술정책, 122, pp.73~80 (2000)
- Torben T, "Consensus conference in the health care sector" (1995), Joss & Durant
- Kluver L, "Consensus conference at the Danish Board of technology" (1995), Joss & Durant
- L Frewer, "Public participation methods: A framework and evaluation", Science, Technology, and Human, 25(1), pp.3~29 (2000)
- Abelson J, "A review of public participation and consultation methods. Deliberations about Deliberation: Issues in the Design and valuation of Public Consultation Processes", McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Research Working Paper, ~ (2001)
- Joss S, "Public participation in science: the role of consensus conference in Europe" (1995), Science Museum
- 이영희, "기술의 사회적 통제와 수용", 경제와 사회, (73), pp.246~268 (2007), 비판사회학회
- 이영희, "과학기술과 시민참여: 근거·형태·비교, 과학기술과 시민참여-합의회의 국내정착을 위한 워크숍" (2000)
- 이영희, "왜 과학기술 분야에서도 시민참여모델에 대한 연구가 필요한가?" (2000), 과학기술정책의 시민참여 모델 연구발표회
- 양진, "참여민주주의·시민운동·법", 공법연구, 26(1), pp.33~40 (1999)
- Joss S, "Danish consensus conferences as a model of participatory technology assessment: An impact study of consensus conference on Danish Parliament and Danish public debate", Science and Public Polish, 25(1), pp.2~22 (1998)
- 김환석, "합의회의의 추진경과 및 발전방향", 과학기술정책, 122, pp.38~45 (2000)
- 홍성만, "과학기술정책에서 신거버넌스의 대두: 시민참여적 프로그램의 활성화", 한국행정학회 2004년도 동계학술대회 (2004)
- 이영희, "과학기술 민주화 기획으로서의 합의회의: 한국의 경험", 동향과 전망, 73(73), pp.294~324 (2008), 한국사회과학연구회
- Bach FH, "Xenotransplantation: problems and prospects", Annual Review of Medicine, 49, pp.10~301 (1998)
- 구인회, "이종이식의 의학윤리적 제문제", 한국의료윤리학회지, 7(1), pp.1~14 (2004), 한국의료윤리학회
- 김병수, "전력정책 합의회의의 경과와 함의 in:참여연대시민 과학센터편" (2005), 시민과학
- 김두환, "제2차 생명복제기술 합의회의: 평가 그리고 전망", 합의회의 국내 도입을 위한 워크샵 (2000)