유전자 검사 및 연구에서의 동의 획득의 문제
Issues in Obtaining Informed Consent to Genetic Test and Research
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Various genetic tests are available. Genetic research is expected to contribute to the development of medicine. Genetic test and research, however, have raised some important ethical issues including genetic privacy, confidentiality, and discrimination. Due to the sensitive characters of genetic information, protecting privacy and keeping confidentiality are the basic requirements. Obtaining informed consent is also mandatory to respect a donor’s or a patient’s autonomy and protect their personal information. Bioethics and Safety Act in Korea regulates genetic test and research. The same rule to regulate genetic test applies to genetic research. Especially the Act enacted a single legal form for both genetic test and research. But genetic research fundamentally differs from genetic test in that the former is research. Thus, the legal form reveals some problems when it is used for genetic research. First, the right to know the outcomes of genetic test might be often waived in genetic research while it should be respected in genetic test. Second, the period for keeping genetic samples should be consented after researchers basically set it up. It is not a good idea that “5 years” is provided as an option in the current legal form. Third, the right to withdrawal of consent should be respected at any time in the course of research regardless of its reasons. Samples should be destroyed without generating further data although data already made until the withdrawal may be used with the permanent deletion of personal identifiers. Therefore, a new consent form for genetic research should be made.
참고문헌 (22)
- "Genetic testing"[URL]
- 이유경, "유전자검사의 임상적 유용성 및 근거중심의 도입" (2006), 보건인력개발원
- "GeneTests website"[URL]
- "Professional Guidelines for Genetic Testing"[URL]
- 김장한, "새로운 형태의 환자 동의서", 대한의사협회
- 김장한, "유전 역학적 연구와 생명윤리 및 개인정보 보호", 한국역학회지, 29(1), pp.13~20 (2007)
- 이인영, "유전자검사와 유전자치료에 관한 쟁점사항과 사회적 수용도", 한림법학포럼, 16, pp.23~54 (2005)
- 이영희, "인간 유전정보 보호와 시민참여", 과학기술연구, 3(1), pp.41~73 (2002)
- 최은경, "유전체 코호트 연구의 윤리적 고려 사항", 예방의학회지, 40(2), pp.122~129 (2007), 대한예방의학회
- 강영호, "자료 연계를 통한 건강 정보 활용에 있어서의 법적, 윤리적 문제와 대책", 예방의학회 심포지움, pp.1~35 (2008)
- 이정념, "국내 유전자은행 관련 법률 및 운영의 문제점과 개선방안", 생명윤리정책연구, 2(1), pp.1~20 (2008), 생명의료법연구소
- Rothstein M. A, "The Law of Medical and Genetic Privacy in the Workplace in Genetic secrets: Protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era", Yale University Press
- 동아일보, "동아일보, 2000년 10월 13일자", ~ (2000)
- Robyn B. Nicoll, "Long-term care insurance and genetic discrimination-get it while you’re young and ignorant: an examination of current discrimination problems in long term care insurance through the use of genetic information", Alb. L.J. Sci & Tech, 13, pp.751~755 (2003)
- "The Council for Responsible Genetics"[URL]
- 보건복지가족부, "기관생명윤리심의위원회 구성ㆍ운영표준지침서", ~ (2008)
- Caulfield T, "DNA databanks and consent: A suggested policy option involving an authorization model" (2003), BMC Med Ethics
- "Summary of the Official Norwegian Report NOU 2005:1-Good Research, Better Health", ~
- HUGO Ethics Committee, "Statement on DNA sampling: Control and access", ~
- Antonio casado da rocha, "Alternative consent models for biobanks: The new spanish law on biomedical research", Bioethics, 22(8), pp.440~447 (2008)
