일본의 고용형태를 이유로 한 차별 금지 법제에 관한 연구
A Legal Study on the Japanese Legal System prohibiting discrimination against casual workers
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Every country has a legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers to cope with widening disparity between casual workers and permanent workers. The way that legislation regulating discrimination is different in Korea and Japan, even though their wage system and personnel management is very similar. In this regard this paper aims to review how the Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers developed, and what is the standard for resonable cause of unequal treatment. The Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers had been made gradually through discussion among labour law professors. The debate originated from the issue on whether casual workers were able to be regarded as the social status mentioned in the article 3 of Labour Standards Law. It moved to the issue that the principal of equal pay for equal work could be regarded as public order and standards of decency. Through dialectical process among theories, balanced treatment principal was settled down as a principal of law to deal with equity between casual workers and permanent workers in Japan. The concept of balanced treatment principal is considering significantly Japanese labour practice, and it can be said to be superordinate concept that includes parity of treatment. This paper makes proposals based on the Japanese Legal System prohibiting discrimination against casual workers. For example, it is necessary to establish rules enhancing casual workers’ comprehension about labor condition to prevent conflict. Also a committee composed of both employer and casual workers is needed to introduce to help them resolve conflict by themselves. In terms of what is the standard for resonable cause of unequal treatment, representing it by types according to purpose and nature of labour is helpful to lessen abstractness.
Abstract
Every country has a legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers to cope with widening disparity between casual workers and permanent workers. The way that legislation regulating discrimination is different in Korea and Japan, even though their wage system and personnel management is very similar. In this regard this paper aims to review how the Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers developed, and what is the standard for resonable cause of unequal treatment. The Japanese legislation prohibiting discrimination against casual workers had been made gradually through discussion among labour law professors. The debate originated from the issue on whether casual workers were able to be regarded as the social status mentioned in the article 3 of Labour Standards Law. It moved to the issue that the principal of equal pay for equal work could be regarded as public order and standards of decency. Through dialectical process among theories, balanced treatment principal was settled down as a principal of law to deal with equity between casual workers and permanent workers in Japan. The concept of balanced treatment principal is considering significantly Japanese labour practice, and it can be said to be superordinate concept that includes parity of treatment. This paper makes proposals based on the Japanese Legal System prohibiting discrimination against casual workers. For example, it is necessary to establish rules enhancing casual workers’ comprehension about labor condition to prevent conflict. Also a committee composed of both employer and casual workers is needed to introduce to help them resolve conflict by themselves. In terms of what is the standard for resonable cause of unequal treatment, representing it by types according to purpose and nature of labour is helpful to lessen abstractness.
참고문헌 (57)
- 임종률, "노동법(제9판)" (2011), 박영사
- 김형배, "노동법(제20판)" (2011), 박영사
- 이승길, "남녀임금차별의 법리- 일본의 입법론과 법해석의 한계를 중심으로 -", 성균관법학, 17(1), pp.373~404 (2005), 법학연구소
- 전윤구, "근로관계에서의 균등대우원칙에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 전윤구, "비정규직 차별시정을 둘러싼 해석론의 검토", 임금연구, 15(1) (2007), 한국경영자총협회
- 차별시정판정사례 분석을 통한 차별시정 운영개선 방안 마련, "조용만", 중앙노동위원회, ~ (2009)
- 박은정, "비정규직 차별시정례(중노위․법원)에 대한 검토(Ⅲ)", 노동법학, (35), pp.231~266 (2010), 한국노동법학회
- 조임영, "비정규직 차별시정제도의 주요 쟁점과 대안, In 비정규직 차별시정제도의 쟁점과 대안", 차별시정제도의 실효성 확보를 위한 정책토론회자료집 (2007)
- 조상균, "비정규직 관련법의 문제점과 개선방안", 산업관계연구, 20(1), pp.111~134 (2010), 한국고용노사관계학회
- 菅野和夫, "勞働法(第4版)" (1996), 弘文堂
- 下井隆史, "勞働基準法(第4版)" (2009), 有斐閣
- 東京大勞働法硏究會, "注釋勞働基準法" (2004), 有斐閣
- 荒木尙志, "詳說勞働契約法" (2008), 弘文堂
- 緖方桂子, "勞働契約の基本原則, In 勞働契約と法" (2011), 旬報社
- 和田肇, "人權保障と勞働法" (2008), 日本評論社
- 野川忍, "勞働契約の理論と實務" (2009), 中央經濟社
- 厚生勞働省, "勞働組合基礎調査", ~ (2010)
- 厚生勞働省, "パートタイム勞働法のあらまし", ~ (2011)
- 勞働政策硏究, "短時間勞働者實態調査", ~ (2010)
- 雇用形態による均等処遇について の硏究會報告書, "荒木尙志", 勞働政策硏究ㆍ硏修機構, ~ (2011)
- 今後のパートタイム勞働對策に關する硏究會報告書, "今野浩一郞", 厚生勞働省, ~ (2011)
- 土田道夫, "パートタイム勞働と均衡の理念", 民商法雜誌, 119(4-5) (1999)
- 浅倉むっ子, "パートタイム勞働と均等待遇原則(下)", 勞働法律旬報, (1387) (1996)
- 浅倉むっ子, "勞働法とジェンダー, In 講座21世紀の勞働法6卷" (2000), 有斐閣
- 本多淳亮, "パートタイム勞働の理論的檢討", 勞働法律旬報, (1405) (1997)
- 和田肇, "パート勞働者法の均等待遇", 勞働法律旬報, (1485) (2000)
- 和田肇, "パート勞働法改正の意義と今後の課題", 季刊勞働法, (220) (2008)
- 山田省三, "勞働法における均等待遇原則の課題", 勞働法律旬報, (1495-1496) (2001)
- 山田省三, "改正 パート勞働法における均等待遇原則の理論的課題", 勞働法律旬報, (1678) (2008)
- 毛塚 勝利, "平等原則への接近方法", 勞働法律旬報, (1422) (1997)
- 毛塚 勝利, "勞働法における平等 － その位置と法理", 勞働法律旬報, (1495-1496) (2001)
- 毛塚 勝利, "勞働法における差別禁止と平等取扱, In 勞働者 人格權の硏究下卷" (2011), 信山社
- 浅野博勝, "非正規勞働者はなぜ增えたか, In 非正規雇用 改革" (2011), 日本評論社
- 島貫智行, "非正社員活用の多樣化と均衡処遇－ パートと契約社員の活用を 中心に", 日本勞働硏究雜誌, (607) (2011)
- 水町勇一郞, "非典型雇用をめくる法理論", 季刊勞働法, (171) (1994)
- 水町勇一郞, "パート勞働者の賃金差別の法律學的檢討", 法學, 58(5) (1994)
- 水町勇一郞, "正社員とパートタイムの賃金格差の違法性－ 丸子警報器事件一私論", ジユリスト, (1094) (1996)
- 水町勇一郞, "｢同一勞働同一賃金｣は幻想か, In 非正規雇用改革" (2011), 日本評論社
- 下井隆史, "パートタイム勞働をめぐる法的問題", 月刊勞働, (492) (1990)
- 脇田濨, "非正規勞働の撤廢をめざす立法ㆍ解釋論", 勞働法律旬報, (1711) (2010)
- 西谷敏, "勞働基準法の二面性と解釋の方法, In 勞働者保護法の硏究" (1994), 有斐閣
- 大木正俊, "非典型勞働者と均等待遇をめぐる法理論", 季刊勞働法, (234) (2011)
- 中嶋士元也, "勞働法理論の現在－ 1993-95年の業績を通じて-", 日本勞働硏究雜誌, (431) (1996)
- 島田陽一, "正社員と臨時社員との賃金格差の適法性, In 平成八年度重要判例解說", ~ (1997)
- 島田陽一, "BOOK REVIEW; パートタイム勞働の法律政策", 日本勞働硏究雜誌, (448) (1997)
- 菅野和夫, "パートタイム勞働と均等待遇原則, In 現代ヨーロシパ゜法の展望" (1998), 東京大學出版會
- 大內伸哉, "賃金格差の違法性(2)－ 日本郵便逓送事件, In 最新重要判例200(勞働法)" (2009), 弘文堂
- 大內伸哉, "非正社員に対する法政策のあり方に關する一私論－ 契約の自由と公正", ジユリスト, (1414) (2011)
- 陳浩展, "パート勞働側から見た改正パートタイム勞働法の評價と問題點", 季刊勞働法, (220) (2008)
- 西村健一郞, "判例法理の檢討－ 女性臨時社員と正社員の賃金格差と 公序良俗違反の成否-", 日本勞働硏究雜誌, (439) (1996)
- 兩角道代, "均衡待遇と差別禁止－ 改正 パート勞働法の意義と課題", 日本勞働硏究雜誌, (576) (2008)
- 川田知子, "パートタイム勞働法八條の差別禁止規定の問題と今後の課題", 勞働法律旬報, (1711) (2008)
- 石井保雄, "女性臨時社員と同正社員の賃金格差が均等待遇理念に反する場合", 季刊勞働法, (181) (1997)
- 中窪裕也, "丸子警報器事件評釋", ジユリスト, (1097) (1996)
- 菅野淑子和, "同一(價値)勞働同一賃金原則の法規範性とその具體的適用－ 丸子 警報器事件ㆍ長野地裁上田支部判決(平八ㆍ三ㆍ一五)の硏究", 勞働法律旬報, (1393) (1998)
- 荒木尙志, "勞働關係法の現代的展開, In 中嶋士元也先生還甲記念論集, In 勞働關係法の現代的展開" (2004), 信山社
- 濱口桂一郞, "勞働法理論の現在－ 2005-07年の業績を通じて-", 日本勞働硏究雜誌, (572) (2008)