본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소멸시효에 관한 입법론적 제안

A legislative suggestion on extinctive prescription

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In the following I suggest a unified legislative for safety of commercial transaction and Protection of Third Person about extinctive prescription of a consignor and commission agent, extinctive prescription of the Director of the Company to the 3rd Party, extinctive prescription of the Right to Claim for Restitution of Unjust Enrichment in Business Transactions. According to the Commercial Code Article 64, Paragraph 1 "commercial activities due to bond dealers on payment or exchange of goods between traders and merchants selling goods shall be completed when the statute of limitations not exercised five years," I suggest. According to the Commercial Article 401, clause 1 "When a director is neglected their duties, deliberately or by gross negligence that directors are responsible for damages to be solidarity against third parties. According to Article 399, paragraph 2 2, paragraph (3) shall apply in the case of the preceding paragraph. According to Section 3 paragraph 1 shall be a statute of limitations period of five years," I suggest. According to the Commercial Law Article 64 "receivables due to commercial activities is completed when the statute of limitations should not exercise when there is no other provision in this Act for five years. But when that provision of the statute of limitations other than the short-term due to its provisions. Here is the basic commercial activities, as well as commercial activities for the Commercial Law Article 46 traders each item also includes subsidiary commercial activities for the sales, " I suggest.

Abstract

In the following I suggest a unified legislative for safety of commercial transaction and Protection of Third Person about extinctive prescription of a consignor and commission agent, extinctive prescription of the Director of the Company to the 3rd Party, extinctive prescription of the Right to Claim for Restitution of Unjust Enrichment in Business Transactions. According to the Commercial Code Article 64, Paragraph 1 "commercial activities due to bond dealers on payment or exchange of goods between traders and merchants selling goods shall be completed when the statute of limitations not exercised five years," I suggest. According to the Commercial Article 401, clause 1 "When a director is neglected their duties, deliberately or by gross negligence that directors are responsible for damages to be solidarity against third parties. According to Article 399, paragraph 2 2, paragraph (3) shall apply in the case of the preceding paragraph. According to Section 3 paragraph 1 shall be a statute of limitations period of five years," I suggest. According to the Commercial Law Article 64 "receivables due to commercial activities is completed when the statute of limitations should not exercise when there is no other provision in this Act for five years. But when that provision of the statute of limitations other than the short-term due to its provisions. Here is the basic commercial activities, as well as commercial activities for the Commercial Law Article 46 traders each item also includes subsidiary commercial activities for the sales, " I suggest.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 강용현, "위탁자의 위탁매매인에 대한 채권의 소멸시효기간", 판례월보, 307 (1996), 판례월보사
  2. 강위두, "상법판례연습" (2009), 법문사
  3. 곽윤직, "민법주해(제Ⅲ권)(총칙(3))" (2005), 박영사
  4. 김성탁, "一般商事消滅時效에 관한 商法 제64조의 立法趣旨와 그 適用對象에 관한 小考", 법학연구, 13(3), pp.75~111 (2010), 법학연구소
  5. 김영호, "상인법총론 상거래법" (1999), 박영사
  6. 김주수, "민법개론" (2003), 삼영사
  7. 김준호, "민법강의" (2007), 법문사
  8. 박철호, "생활법률" (2013), 한올
  9. 손주찬, "상법(上)" (1992), 박영사
  10. 송평근, "무효인 보증보험계약에 기초한 급부가 이루어짐에 따라 발생한 부당 이득반환청구권에 대하여 상사소멸시효가 적용되는지", 대법원판례해설, (67) (2007), 법원도서관
  11. 윤진수, "민법주해(Ⅲ)" (1992), 박영사
  12. 이준현, "알기쉬운 민법전" (2005)
  13. 이철송, "상법총칙・상행위" (2011), 박영사
  14. 이훈종, "이야기로 듣는 상법" (2007), 글누림
  15. 이훈종, "상거래로 인한 부당이득반환청구권의소멸시효에 관한 연구", 법과정책연구, 10(1), pp.307~325 (2010), 한국법정책학회
  16. 정진세, "이사의 분식회계로 인한 회사채권자의 손해에 대한 배상책임의 소멸시효", 법률신문, ~ (2007)
  17. 정희철, "상법원론(上)" (1993), 박영사
  18. 지원림, "민법강의 제11판" (2013), 홍문사
  19. 최성근, "2010년 민법개정안과현행 민법ㆍ상법ㆍ도산법ㆍ조세법의소멸시효 비교연구 - 단기소멸시효 및 소멸시효의 중단ㆍ정지ㆍ완성유예를 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 17(3), pp.95~148 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
  20. 최성호, "보험금청구권의 소멸시효에 관한 연구", 무역보험연구, 10(3) (2009), 한국무역 보험학회
  21. 최창호, "과거사 사건에 있어 법원의 소멸시효 남용론에대한 비판적 고찰", 법조, 62(11), pp.46~90 (2013), 법조협회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)