Factivity Alternation of Attitude ‘know’ in Korean, Mongolian, Uyghur, Manchu, Azeri, etc. and Content Clausal Nominals
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It was discovered in the literature (Lee 1978, 1999; Kiefer 1978, Őzyildiz 2017, Lee 2017) that the epistemic attitude report ‘know’ in Korean, Turkish, and Hungarian reveal factivity alternation and this rare phenomenon has been recently investigated also in such Altaic languages as Mongolian, Uyghur, Manchurian, and Azerbaijan, as first reported here. The attitude report ‘know’ in most languages so far known typically selects for a factive complement (Kiparsky and Kiparsky 1970, Hintikka 1975 a.o.). One generalization made is that nominalized complements tend to convey a factive reading, while non-nominal ones tend not to (Kastner 2015, Moulton 2015 a.o.). This work demonstrates that for a clause selected by a cognitive epistemic attitude verb to have a factive reading, it bears a nominal (D) feature with a structural case, whereas a clause for a non-factive reading, it does not, in alternation languages and possibly beyond. This work shows that a nominalized clause with the internal type ‘pro-fact’ noun –(u)n kes in Korean (and in Japanese as well with koto), witness-based, is factively presupposed by itself and contradicted if predicated by negated veracious adjectives in a veridicality test. It is embedded also by a doxastic verb such as mit- ‘believe.’ The non-factive alternants of ‘know’ in all the languages logically belong to the doxastic category of ‘believe’, though with implication of evidential justification in distinction with the real ‘believe,’ undergoing neg-raising, revealing their anti-rogativity. Thus, more weight is given to complements typing than to attitude reports typing.
Abstract
It was discovered in the literature (Lee 1978, 1999; Kiefer 1978, Őzyildiz 2017, Lee 2017) that the epistemic attitude report ‘know’ in Korean, Turkish, and Hungarian reveal factivity alternation and this rare phenomenon has been recently investigated also in such Altaic languages as Mongolian, Uyghur, Manchurian, and Azerbaijan, as first reported here. The attitude report ‘know’ in most languages so far known typically selects for a factive complement (Kiparsky and Kiparsky 1970, Hintikka 1975 a.o.). One generalization made is that nominalized complements tend to convey a factive reading, while non-nominal ones tend not to (Kastner 2015, Moulton 2015 a.o.). This work demonstrates that for a clause selected by a cognitive epistemic attitude verb to have a factive reading, it bears a nominal (D) feature with a structural case, whereas a clause for a non-factive reading, it does not, in alternation languages and possibly beyond. This work shows that a nominalized clause with the internal type ‘pro-fact’ noun –(u)n kes in Korean (and in Japanese as well with koto), witness-based, is factively presupposed by itself and contradicted if predicated by negated veracious adjectives in a veridicality test. It is embedded also by a doxastic verb such as mit- ‘believe.’ The non-factive alternants of ‘know’ in all the languages logically belong to the doxastic category of ‘believe’, though with implication of evidential justification in distinction with the real ‘believe,’ undergoing neg-raising, revealing their anti-rogativity. Thus, more weight is given to complements typing than to attitude reports typing.
참고문헌 (41)
- 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean", 언어, 34(2), pp.267~281 (2009), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "More on the Absence of CP Ellipsis: A Reply to Park (2009)", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.137~148 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Anand, P., "The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim", pp.69~90 (2014), MITWPL
- Barwise, J., "Situations and Attitudes" (1983), MIT Press
- Factivity Alternation due to Semantic Composition: ‘think’ and ‘remember’ in Barguzin Buryat. MIT Generals Paper, "Bondarenko, T.", ~ (2019)
- Bogal-Allbritten, E., "Navajo in the Typology of Internally-headed Relatives", SALT, 2017, pp.700~720 (2017)
- Bošković, Ž, "Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.27~89 (2014)
- Chung, D, "A Complement Analysis of the Head Internal Relative Clauses", Language and Information, 3, pp.1~12 (1999)
- 정대호, "A Constituency-based Explanation of Syntactic Restrictions on Korean Predicates", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.199~221 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- den Dikken, M., "Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas" (2006), MIT Press
- Djärv, K., "Cognitive vs. Emotive Factives: An Experimental Differentiation", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, pp.367~386 (2018)
- 도정업, "만주어 내포문에 나타나는 seme의 문법적 지위", 동양학, (69), pp.13~31 (2017), 동양학연구원[DOI]
- Fiengo, R, "On Trace Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.35~61 (1977)
- Hanink, R., "Factivity in Embedded Clauses in Washo", Paper presented at 2017 LSA 91 (2017)
- Hazlett, Allan, "The Myth of Factive Verbs", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80(3), pp.497~522 (2010)
- Hintikka J., "Knowledge and Belief", pp.1962
- Hintikka J, "The Intentions of Intensionality", pp.1~25 (1975), Kluwer
- Horn. L., "A Natural History of Negation" (1985), CSLI Publications
- Horn. L., "Black Book, A Festschrift in Honor of Frans Zwarts", pp.178~196 (2014)
- Kastner I, "Factivity Mirrors Interpretation: The Selectional Requirements of Presuppositional Verbs", Lingua, 164, pp.156~188 (2015)
- Kiefer, F, "Factivity in Hungarian", Studies in Language, 2(2), pp.165~197 (1978)
- Kim, M, "E-type Anaphora and Three Types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(2), pp.345~377 (2009)
- Kiparsky, C., "Progress in Linguistics", pp.143~173 (1970), Mouton
- 고희정, "On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.347~375 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Koppen, M. van, "The Proleptic Accusative as an Exceptional Case Marking Construction", MS, pp.2014
- Kratzer, A., "Decomposing Attitude Verbs", pp.2006
- Kratzer, A., "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2016)
- "Maum 1 ‘Mind’ (A Journal of the Mind Philosophy Society Ywusimhoy)", 1978, 60~65
- Lee, C., "Aspects of Aspect in Korean: General Implications of Psych-predicates", Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity, Studies in Language Companion volume, Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, pp.223~249 (1999), John Benjamins
- Lee, C., "Factivity Alternation of the Attitude Verb ʻknowʼ in Four Languages and Factivity Presupposition by Nominal Complement Clause in Two Languages", 학술원?, ~ (2019)
- 이정민, "Factivity Alternation of the Verb ‘Know’ in Korean, Turkish and Hungarian", 현대문법연구, (100), pp.1~40 (2018), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Lee, C., "The Cloud of ‘Knowing’: Non-factive al-ta ‘know’ (as a Neg-raiser) in Korean", PACLIC, 30, pp.527~533 (2016)
- Lee, C., "Factivity in its Relation to Politeness: Hierarchical Structures Matter", Talk at the Social Meaning Workshop (2019), ESSLLI
- Moulton, K., "Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation", Open Access Dissertations, 99 (2009)
- Moulton, K, "CPs: Copies and Compositionality", Linguistics Inquiry, 46, pp.305~342 (2015)
- Őzyildiz, D, "Attitude Reports with and without True Belief", Proceedings of SALT, 27, pp.1~12 (2017)
- Antipresuppositions, In Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Reference and Anaphora: Toward the Establishment of Generative Grammar as an Empirical Science, "Percus, O", Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 52~73 (2006)
- Plato. C., "Meno" (1976), Hackett
- Schulz, P., "Factivity: Its Nature and Acquisition" (2003), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Shim, J. Y, "Facts: The Interplay between the Matrix Predicate and its Clausal Complement", Newcastle and Northumbria Working Papers in Linguistics Vol 21: The Second Asian and European Linguistic Conference, pp.130~144 (2015)
- Theiler, N., "A Uniform Semantics for Declarative and Interrogative Complements", Journal of Semantics, 35, pp.409~466 (2018)