칸트 미학에서의 ‘형식(Form)’ 개념에 대한 고찰
The study on the conception of ‘form’ in Kant’s aesthetics
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kant explained we finally judge the beauty by means of form of the presented object. So, to comprehend the conception of ‘form’ in Kant’s aesthetics is important to understand the mechanism of the aesthetic judgement. In Kant’ aesthetics, the conception of form implicates three meanings. First, the form of the object is defined as a fixed contour or figure, by which materials of the object are obtained a definite organization. According to Kant, on basis of it the subject can sensationally perceive the object and judge the beauty of it. And second, the form is identified with ‘pure sense’ and ‘a unity of variety of sense’. Kant constantly insisted that the form is different from the material, but in preceding explanation, he recognized the unification of form and matter. On one hand, he emphasized that the aesthetic judgement on the object has nothing to do with concept or purpose. But, like the preceding instance, he recognized the unification of form and concept. And third, the form is given the meanings of an ultimate product made in process of aesthetic perception and a final materialization by the subject’s aesthetic contemplation. Namely, the form of the object is catched when the aesthetic contemplation that relies on simultaneous actions of free imagination and strict understanding and abstracts concepts and purposes from the object is performed in the subject.
Abstract
Kant explained we finally judge the beauty by means of form of the presented object. So, to comprehend the conception of ‘form’ in Kant’s aesthetics is important to understand the mechanism of the aesthetic judgement. In Kant’ aesthetics, the conception of form implicates three meanings. First, the form of the object is defined as a fixed contour or figure, by which materials of the object are obtained a definite organization. According to Kant, on basis of it the subject can sensationally perceive the object and judge the beauty of it. And second, the form is identified with ‘pure sense’ and ‘a unity of variety of sense’. Kant constantly insisted that the form is different from the material, but in preceding explanation, he recognized the unification of form and matter. On one hand, he emphasized that the aesthetic judgement on the object has nothing to do with concept or purpose. But, like the preceding instance, he recognized the unification of form and concept. And third, the form is given the meanings of an ultimate product made in process of aesthetic perception and a final materialization by the subject’s aesthetic contemplation. Namely, the form of the object is catched when the aesthetic contemplation that relies on simultaneous actions of free imagination and strict understanding and abstracts concepts and purposes from the object is performed in the subject.
참고문헌 (10)
- 임마누엘 칸트, "판단력 비판" (1974), 박영사
- 임마누엘 칸트, "순수이성비판" (1983), 박영사
- 강영선, "철학대사전" (1989), 교육출판공사
- 김동규, "칸트의 <판단력 비판>에 나타난 예술의 자율성", 석사, pp.1998
- 김상봉, "칸트와 숭고의 개념 in: 칸트와 미학" (1997), 민음사
- 김수배, "‘미적 판단력 비판’에 있어서 ‘Form’ 개념에 관하여", 석사, pp.1987
- 김태은, "칸트의 상상력 개념에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2007
- D. W. 크로포드, "칸트 미학 이론" (1995), 서광사
- 블라디슬로프 타타르키비츠, "여섯가지 개념의 역사" (1998), 이론과실천
- I. Kant, "Critique Of Judgment" (1951), Hafner Press
