본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

The Problem of Skepticism in Locke, Berkeley, and Hume: English Philosophers’ Progress in Empiricism

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In the history of Western philosophical tradition we have three very distinct schools of philosophy: Cartesian rationalism, Leibnizian idealism and Lockean empiricism, which respectively account for the difference among the French, German and English philosophy. In Great Britain some philosophers made a great effort to establish their own brand of philosophy based on sense and experience. Experience thus is the key word of the controlling force of the English intellectual life. Francis Bacon and John Locke were two pillars of the English national spirit in all fields of science, knowledge, art and literature. The aim of this paper is to discuss the process and progress of three champions’ efforts to establish British empiricism in terms of skepticism in general. Locke was the very first builder of English empiricism in contrast to French rationalism and German idealism. Locke started against the skepticism in order to find truth and knowledge and concluded all knowledge comes from sense and experience. George Berkeley, the immediate follower of Locke, elaborated the theory of knowledge through sense-perception. David Hume was the last of three most representive creators of English empiricism. Through the mires of skepticism Hume reached the fundamental theory of epistemology. Three giants in the history of British philosophy set up a new system of knowledge and truth in everyday life of this world. The new kind of creative epistemology is just called now English empiricism. It is now desirable that the close relationship between British philosophy of empiricism and the English literature should be studied in terms of English aesthetic and critical theories.

Abstract

In the history of Western philosophical tradition we have three very distinct schools of philosophy: Cartesian rationalism, Leibnizian idealism and Lockean empiricism, which respectively account for the difference among the French, German and English philosophy. In Great Britain some philosophers made a great effort to establish their own brand of philosophy based on sense and experience. Experience thus is the key word of the controlling force of the English intellectual life. Francis Bacon and John Locke were two pillars of the English national spirit in all fields of science, knowledge, art and literature. The aim of this paper is to discuss the process and progress of three champions’ efforts to establish British empiricism in terms of skepticism in general. Locke was the very first builder of English empiricism in contrast to French rationalism and German idealism. Locke started against the skepticism in order to find truth and knowledge and concluded all knowledge comes from sense and experience. George Berkeley, the immediate follower of Locke, elaborated the theory of knowledge through sense-perception. David Hume was the last of three most representive creators of English empiricism. Through the mires of skepticism Hume reached the fundamental theory of epistemology. Three giants in the history of British philosophy set up a new system of knowledge and truth in everyday life of this world. The new kind of creative epistemology is just called now English empiricism. It is now desirable that the close relationship between British philosophy of empiricism and the English literature should be studied in terms of English aesthetic and critical theories.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Ayer, A. J, "Hume" (1980), Hill and Wang
  2. Beck,Lewis.W.Ed, "18th-Century Philosophy" (1966), The Free Press
  3. Berkeley, George, "Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous" (1979), Hackett Publishing Company
  4. Bréhier, Emile, "The Eighteenth Century. Trans Wade Baskin" (1971), The U of Chicago P
  5. Copleston, "History of Philosophy. Modern Philosophy. The British Philosophers, part Ⅱ. Berkeley to Hume" (1964), Doubleday and Company
  6. Deleuze, Gilles, "Dialogues: Gilles Deleuze and Claire Parnet" (1987), Columbia UP
  7. Deleuze, Gilles, "Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature" (1991), Columbia UP
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, "Pure Immanence: Essays of A Life" (2001), Zone Books
  9. Drabble, Margaret, "The Oxford Companion to English Literature" (1985), Oxford UP
  10. Dunn, John, "Locke" (1984), Oxford UP
  11. Eckermann, J. P, "Conversation with Goethe." (1964), Frederick Ungar
  12. Hume, David, "On Human Nature and the Understanding"
  13. "Anthony Frew" (1971), Collier Books
  14. Deleuze, Gilles, "The Philosophy of David Hume" (1963), The Modern Library
  15. James, William, "The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Introduction and Notes by Wayne Proudfoot" (2004), Barnes and Noble
  16. Jolley,Nicholas, "Locke:His Philosophical Thought" (1999), Oxford UP
  17. Leeuwen, "The Problem of Certainty in English Thought: 1630-1690" (1970), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
  18. Locke, John, "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Abridged" (1964), A Meridion Book
  19. Mossner, E. C, "Hume and the Legacy of the Dialogues. in David Hume: Bicentenary Papers" (1977), At the University Press
  20. Passmore, J. A, "Hume and the Ethics of Belief in David Hume: Bicentenary Papers" (1977), At the University Press
  21. Popkins, Richard H, "Berkeley and Pyrrhonism", The Review of Metaphysics, 5(2), pp.145~166 (1951)
  22. Talmor, Ezra, "Descartes and Hume" (1980), Pergamon Press
  23. Tipton, I. C, "The Philosophy of Immaterialism" (1974), Methuen & Co. Ltd
  24. Wellek, René, "A History of Modern Criticism 1750-1950", Yale UP, 1 (1950)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)