인간 영혼의 불사성 문제로 본 중세철학과 르네상스철학의 연속성-아베로에스와 폼포나치의 비교를 중심으로
The Continuity between Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy in the Problem of the Human Soul’s Immortality
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is widely acknowledged that Averroes and Pomponazzi each were one of the most important Aristotelian philosophers in the Middle ages and Renaissance respectively, and their views were both equally a menace to Christianity. This paper aims to show the continuity between medieval and Renaissance philosophy by focusing on Pomponazzi's critique of Averroes. Pomponazzi argues that Averroes’s so-called monopsychism is not a correct interpretation of Aristotle’s De anima by appealing to the Aristotelian maxim that the soul never thinks without imagination. Despite of their differences in interpretation, both of them give a negative answer in dealing with the question of whether the human soul can be both the form of the body and the immaterial principle of thought, which provoked many of the leading philosophical controversies of the Middle ages and Renaissance. They are similar in the way that they deny the soul’s immateriality and immortality while accepting the fact that the soul and the body make a single, unified substance. Thus, it is my contention that they share the common belief that the individual immortality of the human soul cannot be philosophically proved.
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that Averroes and Pomponazzi each were one of the most important Aristotelian philosophers in the Middle ages and Renaissance respectively, and their views were both equally a menace to Christianity. This paper aims to show the continuity between medieval and Renaissance philosophy by focusing on Pomponazzi's critique of Averroes. Pomponazzi argues that Averroes’s so-called monopsychism is not a correct interpretation of Aristotle’s De anima by appealing to the Aristotelian maxim that the soul never thinks without imagination. Despite of their differences in interpretation, both of them give a negative answer in dealing with the question of whether the human soul can be both the form of the body and the immaterial principle of thought, which provoked many of the leading philosophical controversies of the Middle ages and Renaissance. They are similar in the way that they deny the soul’s immateriality and immortality while accepting the fact that the soul and the body make a single, unified substance. Thus, it is my contention that they share the common belief that the individual immortality of the human soul cannot be philosophically proved.
참고문헌 (38)
- 자연의빛에 의한 진리탐구, "성찰", pp.문예출판사, 프로그램에 대한 주석
- 성 염, "피코 델라 미란돌라" (1996), 철학과 현실사
- 아리스토텔레스, "영혼에 관하여" (2001), 궁리
- 폴 크리스텔러, "르네상스의 사상과 그 원천" (1993), 계명대학교 출판부
- 토마스 아퀴나스, "지성 단일성" (2007), 분도출판사
- 박경자, "폼포나치의 물리주의와 데카르트의 실체이원론", 철학논총, 3(45), pp.125~144 (2006), 새한철학회
- 박경자, "홉스의 무신론과 폼포나치의 자연주의", 철학논총, 3(49), pp.135~156 (2007), 새한철학회
- 유원기, "영혼의 불멸성에 관한 폼포나치의 견해", 중세철학, (12), pp.139~172 (2006), 한국중세철학회
- 유원기, "폼포나치의 영혼 불멸성 이론과 현대심리철학", 서양고전학연구, (29), pp.217~246 (2007), 한국서양고전학회
- 이경재, "시제 브라방과 13세기 지성단일성 논쟁", 중세철학, (17), pp.113~143 (2011), 한국중세철학회
- 이재경, "르네상스철학자 폼포나치의 아리스토텔레스 읽기: 토마스 아퀴나스에 대한 비판을 중심으로", 철학, (88), pp.67~91 (2006), 한국철학회
- 이재경, "폼포나치의 종교적 믿음에 대하여", 서양고전학연구, (27), pp.255~276 (2006), 한국서양고전학회
- 이재경, "아베로에스와 내세의 문제 ― 종교와 철학의 관계를 중심으로", 대동철학, (61), pp.63~81 (2012), 대동철학회
- 이재경, "뷰리당과 중세의 물리주의", 철학논집, 35, pp.39~72 (2013), 철학연구소
- 이재경, "르네상스철학자 폼포나치의 절충주의", 범한철학, 43(4), pp.183~205 (2006), 범한철학회
- 정현석, "시제 브라방의 지성과 육체의 관계 이해 －시제 브라방의 『영혼론 제3권의 문제들』을 중심으로－", 중세철학, (19), pp.147~182 (2013), 한국중세철학회
- 조규홍, "P. Pomponazzi의 플라톤주의적 사유: 수용과 거부", 대동철학, (35), pp.217~254 (2006), 대동철학회
- 조규홍, "피치노의 인간관 연구", 중세철학, 13(13), pp.323~365 (2007), 한국중세철학회
- Averroes, "Averrois Cordubensis commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros" (1953), Medieval Academy
- Averroes, "Tahafut al-Tahafut(The Incoherence of the Incoherence)" (2012), E-text Edition
- Black, Deborah, "Consciousness and Self-Knowledge in Aquinas’s Critique of Averroes’s Psychology", Journal of the History of Philosophy, 31, pp.349~385 (1993)
- Duns Scotus, "Philosophical Writings" (1987), Hackett
- Constant, E. A., "A Reinterpretation of the Fifth Lateran Council Decree Apostolici Regiminis(1513)", Sixteenth Century Journal, 33, pp.353~379 (2002)
- Descartes, Rene, "Philosophical Letters" (1970), Oxford University Press
- Ficino, Marsilio, "Platonic Theology" (2001), Harverd University Press
- Kraye, Jill, "The Immortality of the Soul in the Renaissance: b e t w e e n Natural Philosophy and Theology", Signatures, 1, pp.51~68 (2000)
- Kristeller, Paul O, "Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance" (1964), Stanford University Press
- Mansi, G. D., "Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio", Venice, ~
- Martin, Christopher, "On a Mistake Commonly Made in Accounts of Sixteenth-Century Discussions of the Immortality of the Soul", American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 69, pp.29~37 (1995)
- William Ockham, "Quodlibetal Questions" (1991), Yale University Press
- Pasnau, Robert, "The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy", pp.486~504 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Pine, Martin, "Pietro Pomponazzi: Radical Philosopher of the Renaissance" (1986), Antenore
- Pomponazzi, Pietro, "The Renaissance Philosophy of Man", pp.280~381 (1948), The University of Chicago Press
- Pomponazzi, Pietro, "Corsi inediti dell’insegnamento padovano" (1966), Antenore
- Pomponazzi, Pietro, "Tractatus de immortalitate animae: Abhandlung über die Unsterblichkeit der Seele" (1990), Felix Meiner
- Siger of Brabant, "Quaestiones in tertium de anima, De anima intellectiva, De aeternitate mundi" (1972), Publications universitaires Béatrice-Nauwelaerts
- Siger of Brabant, "Quaestiones super librum de causis" (1972), Publications universitaires Béatrice-Nauwelaerts
- Wippel, John, "The Condemnations of 1270 and 1277 at Paris", The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 7, pp.169~201 (1977)