유럽연합의 보호책임원칙 논의와 인도적 지원 매커니즘: 미얀마 사례를 중심으로
EU’s Responsibility to Protect and Humanitarian Assistance: A Case Study on Myanmar’s Humanitarian Situations
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
전 세계적으로 재난의 종류가 복잡해지고 다양해짐에 따라 인도적 위기 상황은 심화되고 있다. 국제개발협력 분야에서 유럽연합기관들(European Union Institutions)의 역할은 점차 커지고 있다. 유럽은 국제사회의 인도적 지원 분야에서도 그 두각을 나타내고있다. 동 연구는 유럽연합의 국제사회에 대한 인도주의적 기여를 다음과 같은 두가지 측면에 집중해서 분석하고자 한다. 첫째, 보호책임원칙(Responsibility to Protect, R2P)에 대한 유럽연합의 논의와 기여에 대해 분석한다. 둘째, 유럽 연합의 인도적 지원(humanitarian assistance) 체계를 분석하고자 한다. 이 연구는 동남아시아 지역 특히 미얀마의 인도적 위기를 중심으로 연구를 진행하고자 한다. 2008년 미얀마를 덮친 사이클론나르기스 사태로 촉발된 보호책임 논쟁, 로힝야 사태, 가장 최근인 2021년 2월 군부 쿠데타 등 미얀마의 인도적 위기 상황은 유럽연합뿐 아니라 국제사회에 인도적 위기 대응에대한 도전 과제를 제공하고 있다.
Abstract
As the types of disasters worldwide become more complex and diversified, the humanitarian crisis is intensifying. In International Development and Cooperation and Humanitarian Assistance, the role of Institutions of the European Union becomes crucial. This study attempts to analyze the humanitarian contribution of the European Union to the international community by focusing on the following two aspects. First, the research discusses the contribution of the European Union to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Second, the paper explores the system and the mechanism of the EU's humanitarian assistance. The research specifically focuses on humanitarian issues in Southeast Asia with a specific focus on Myanmar. The humanitarian crisis in Myanmar, such as the controversy over R2P sparked by the Cyclone Nargis crisis, struck Myanmar in 2008. Furthermore, the Rohingya crisis and the most recent military coup in February 2021 provide a significant challenge for the European Union and the international community to respond to a humanitarian crisis.
참고문헌 (31)
- 대한적십자사, "솔페리노의 회상" (2009), 대한적십자사
- "국제인도법이란?"[URL]
- 박지현, "난민, 실향민과 국제인도법에 대한 연구", 인도법논총, 36 (2016)
- 이용호, "우리나라에 있어서의 국제인도법의 발전과 한계", 법학논총, 26(3), pp.283~321 (2014), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 장은하, "인도적 지원의 정의에 관한 소고: 국제기구와 공여국 정부의 인도적 지원 개념을 중심으로", 국제개발협력연구, 6(2) (2014)
- Aggestam, Lisbeth, "Ethical Power Europe?", Special Issue of International Affairs, 84(1) (2008)
- Broberg, Morten, "EU Humanitarian Aid after the Lisbon Treaty", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22(3) (2014)
- "The Burma Cyclone and the Responsibility to Protect, Congressional Briefing on Security for a New Century"[URL]
- De Franco, C, "Living by Example? The European Union and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)", Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5) (2015)
- Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2020, "Development Initiatives", ~ (2020)
- Elsuwege, Peter Van, "EU Management of Global Emergencies: Legal Framework for Combating Threats and Crises" (2014), Brill
- Ercan, Pinar Gozen, "How can a ‘Responsible’ European Union Contribute to the Implementation of the Reponsbility to Protect?", European Review, 27(4) (2019)
- Haccke, Jurgen, "The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect" (2016), Oxford University Press
- "The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid, Official Journal of the European Union" (2008)[URL]
- Manner, Ian, "Normative power Europe : A contradiction in terms", Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2) (2002)
- Mennecke, Martin, "The Failure of the International Community to Apply R2P and Atrocity Prevention in Myanmar", Global Responsibility to Protect, 13 (2021)
- Morada, Noel M, "ASEAN and Rakhine Crisis : Balancing Non-interference, Accounability, and Strategic Interests in Responding to Atrocities in Myanmar", Global Responsibility to Protect, 13 (2021)
- "Statement of the Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide on the situation in Myanmar" (2013)[URL]
- Official Journal of the European Union, "Council Decision (CFSP) 2021", 639 of 19 April 2021 amending Decision 2013, CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar, pp.Burma, Vol. 64[DOI]
- Ozerdem, Alpaslan, "The ‘responsibility to protect’ in natural disasters: antoher excuse for interventionism? Nargis Cyclone, Myanmar", Conflict, Security & Development, 10(5) (2010)
- Paik, Wooyeal, "Authoritarianism and Humanitarian Aid : Regime Stability and External Relief in China and Myanmar", The Pacific Review, 24(4) (2011)
- Pedersen, Morten B., "The Rohingya Crisis, Myanmar, and R2P ‘Black Holes’", Global Responsibility to Protect, 13 (2021)
- Rieff, David, "Humanitarianism in crisis", Foreign Affairs, 81(6), pp.111~121 (2002)
- Smith, Karen E., "The EU and the Responsibility to Protect in an Illiberal Era", Dahrendorf Forum IV (2018), Dahrendorf Forum
- Staunton, Egaltine, "The Responsibility to Protect norm cluster and the challenge of atrocity prevention : an analysis of the European Union’s strategy in Myanmar", European Journal of International Relations, 26(3) (2020)
- Filling ‘the Gap’: Lessons Well Learnt by the Multilateral Aid Agencies, "Suhrke, Astri", Michelsen Institute, ~ (2005)
- "Should R2P Be Invoked in the case of Myanmar?"[URL]
- Twitchett, Kenneth J., "Yaounde Association and the Enlarged European Community", The World Today, 30(2) (1974)
- "The role of regional and subregional arrangements in implementing the responsibility to protest – Report of the Secretary-General(A/65/877-S/.2011/393)" (2011)[URL]
- "Resolution 60/1: 2005 World Summit Outcome" (2005)[URL]
- Versluys, Helen, "Depoliticising and Europeanising humanitarian aid: Success or failure?", Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 9(2) (2008)