The EU, Korea, and Taiwan: Normative Cooperation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to China's rise as a regional power, competition between the United States and China in the Indo-Pacific region is intensifying. The unavoidable conflict between the US and China requires the European Union, South Korea, and Taiwan to develop their own coping strategies, which will inevitably impact their bilateral relationships with the EU. In this context, this paper aims to examine whether the major players in the Indo-Pacific region will continue to maintain normative relations as they have done in the past. To do this, this paper seeks to analyze the reasons and procedures for successful value diplomacy based on universal norms and values. The paper argues that the normative characteristics of the European Union seeking to overcome nationalism, Korea's pursuit of a pivotal state, and Taiwan's diplomatic policy based on functional sovereignty are the main driving forces.
Abstract
Due to China's rise as a regional power, competition between the United States and China in the Indo-Pacific region is intensifying. The unavoidable conflict between the US and China requires the European Union, South Korea, and Taiwan to develop their own coping strategies, which will inevitably impact their bilateral relationships with the EU. In this context, this paper aims to examine whether the major players in the Indo-Pacific region will continue to maintain normative relations as they have done in the past. To do this, this paper seeks to analyze the reasons and procedures for successful value diplomacy based on universal norms and values. The paper argues that the normative characteristics of the European Union seeking to overcome nationalism, Korea's pursuit of a pivotal state, and Taiwan's diplomatic policy based on functional sovereignty are the main driving forces.
참고문헌 (30)
- South Korea's evolving Indo-Pacific strategy: opportunities and challenges for cooperation with the EU, "Ballback, J. Eric", SWP, ~, pp.Research Paper, No. 2 (2023), 2023
- Borg, Stefan, "Postmodern EU? Integration between alternative horizons and territorial angst", Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1) (2016)
- Brown, AW Scott, "Fraying at the Edges : A Subsystems", Normative Power Analysis of the EU's"One China Policy, The China Quarterly, pp.2022, 252[DOI]
- "Taiwan and EU Hold Trade and Investment Dialogue"[URL]
- Diez, Thomas, "Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering Normative Power Europe", Millennium, 33(3) (2005)
- Duchêne, François, "Europe tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans look ahead", pp.43~ (1972)
- European Commission, "Towards a New Asia Strategy, Communication from the Commission to the Council, COM (94) 314 final", ~ (1994)
- European Commission, "Global Europe: Competing in the World. COM(2006) 567 final", European Commission, ~ (2006)
- "EU-Taiwan Relations 2021"[URL]
- "Joint Communication on the EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, Brussels" (2001)[URL]
- Giddens, Anthony, "The constitution of society : Outline of the theory of structuration" (1984), Univ of California Press
- Grgić, Gorana, "Shifting narratives? The EU’s approach to the Indo-Pacific after the war in Ukraine", Journal of European Integration
- Ferenczy, Zsuzsa Anna, "The EU’s New Thinking in a New Geopolitical Reality: How Challenges to the Global Order are Driving EU-Taiwan Ties", The Journal of East Asia Affairs, 36(1) (2023)
- Hyde-Price, Adrian, "‘Normative'power Europe : a realist critique", Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2) (2006)
- Jun, Hae-won, "EU-Korea Security Relations" (2021), Routledge
- Kelly, E. Robert, "Korea–European Union relations : beyond the FTA?", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 12(1) (2012)
- Krumbein, Frédéric, "Leaving the dragon’s shadow–Normative Power Europe and the emergence of a Taiwan policy in the EU?", Journal of European Integration, 46(2) (2024)
- Lee, Moosung, "The Routledge Handbook of Europe-Korea Relations" (2021), Routledge
- Lee, Moosung, "The EU, Korea, and conflict transformation through regional integration", Asia Europe Journal, 21(4) (2023)
- Manners, Ian, "Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?", Journal of common market studies, 40(2) (2002)
- Medcalf, Rory, "Contest for the Indo-Pacific : Why China Won’t Map the Future" (2020), La Trobe University Press
- Mitzen, Jennifer, "Anchoring Europe's civilizing identity : habits, capabilities and ontological security", Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2) (2006)
- Mitzen, Jennifer, "Ontological security in world politics : State identity and the security dilemma", European journal of international relations, 12(3) (2006)
- Nosov, Mikhail, "Indo-Pacific region", Rivista di Studi Politici Internazionali, 88(4) (2021)
- Novotná, Tereza, "EU-Korea relations at 60: managing cooperation in the context of great power rivalry", Asia Europe Journal, 21(4) (2023)
- From Shrimp to Middle Power to Something More? South Korea as a Global Pivotal State, "Pardo, Ramon Pacheco Pardo", KEI, 142~ (2023)
- Rhu, Yongwook, "South Korea in 2022: Aspiring to Become a Global Pivotal State?", East Asian Policy, 15(01) (2023)
- Shambaugh, David, "US-China rivalry in Southeast Asia: power shift or competitive coexistence?", International Security, 42(4) (2018)
- Siles-Brügge, Gabriel, "Resisting protectionism after the crisis : strategic economic discourse and the EU–Korea free trade agreement", New Political Economy, 16(5) (2011)
- Winkler, Sigrid, "Can trade make a sovereign? Taiwan–China–EU relations in the WTO", Asia Europe Journal, 6(3-4) (2008)