Connecting security between the EU and South Korea: New Agenda and New Methodology
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The EU and South Korea are the only partners, which have signed the Framework Agreement, the Free Trade Agreement, and the Strategic partnership Agreement. It is all these agreements that have indeed paved the way for them to interact in a more comprehensive, but yet concrete, way to develop their bilateral relationship. Against this backdrop, this paper aims to study the connectivity between the EU and South Korea in both hard and soft security, asking in what ways, and to what extent, this would actually affect the EU’s normative stance in world politics, as well as South Korea’s commitment to help it realize such a political objective. For this objective, the paper will discuss the EU’s normative feature, as well as its implications for its relationship with Korea, focusing on the normative feature of the EU in its relationship with Korea, as well as the corresponding methods befitting to its international identity. Keeping this mind, the paper seeks to verify that there are connectivity in military dimension, if a variety of security issues either through their joint participation in the KEDO program and through crisis management operations are subject of analysis.
Abstract
The EU and South Korea are the only partners, which have signed the Framework Agreement, the Free Trade Agreement, and the Strategic partnership Agreement. It is all these agreements that have indeed paved the way for them to interact in a more comprehensive, but yet concrete, way to develop their bilateral relationship. Against this backdrop, this paper aims to study the connectivity between the EU and South Korea in both hard and soft security, asking in what ways, and to what extent, this would actually affect the EU’s normative stance in world politics, as well as South Korea’s commitment to help it realize such a political objective. For this objective, the paper will discuss the EU’s normative feature, as well as its implications for its relationship with Korea, focusing on the normative feature of the EU in its relationship with Korea, as well as the corresponding methods befitting to its international identity. Keeping this mind, the paper seeks to verify that there are connectivity in military dimension, if a variety of security issues either through their joint participation in the KEDO program and through crisis management operations are subject of analysis.
참고문헌 (30)
- Aggestam, Lisbeth, "Introduction : ethical power Europe", International Affairs, 84(1) (2008)
- KEDO: How multilateral cooperation helped an unprecedented North Korean project, "Aoki, Naoko", CISSM Working Paper, ~ (2017)
- Buzan, Barry, Ole Weaver and Jaap de Wilde, "Security : A new framework for analysis" (1998), Lynne Rienner Publishers
- "EU Strategic Partnerships with Third Countries" (2021)[URL]
- Cornish, Paul, "The strategic culture of the European Union : a progress report", International Affairs, 81(4) (2005)
- Deutsch, W Karl, "Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience" (1957), Princeton University Press
- Diez, Thomas, "Constructing the Self and Changing Others. Reconsidering `Normative Power Europe'", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3) (2005)
- Diez, Thomas, "The EU, Promoting Regional Integration, and Conflict Resolution" (2017), Palgrave Macmillan
- "Toward a New Asia Strategy. COM (94) 314 final" (1994)[URL]
- Falk, Richard, "Contending Images of World Politics" (2000), Routledge
- Higashino, Atsuko, "For the Sake of ‘Peace and Security’? The Role of Security in the European Union Enlargement Eastwards", Cooperation and Conflict, 39(4) (2004)
- Holsti, K. J., "National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy", International Studies Quarterly, 14(3) (1970)
- Howorth, Jolyon, "EU Global Strategy in a changing world : Brussels’ approach to the emerging powers", Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3) (2016)
- Jun, Hae-won, "The Routledge Handbook of Europe-Korea Relations" (2021), Routledge
- Kartman, Charles, "Policy in Context: A History of KEDO 1994-2006", CISAC (2012)
- Manners, Ian, "Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?", Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2) (2002)
- Manners, Ian, "The Normative ethics of the European Union", International Affairs, 84(1) (2008)
- ichalski, Anna, "Role Dynamics in a Structural Relationship : The EU-China Strategic Partnership", Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3) (2017)
- Mitrany, David, "The prospect of integration : Federal or functional", Journal of Common Market Studies, 4(2) (1965)
- Mitzen, Jennifer, "Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity: habits, capabilities and ontological security", Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2) (2006)
- Lee, Moosung, "The EU, regional cooperation, and the North Korean nuclear crisis", Asia Europe Journal, 14(4) (2016)
- Lee, Moosung, "Introduction: the EU, East Asian conflicts, and the norm of integration", Asia Europe Journal, 14(4) (2016)
- Lee, Moosung, "Promoting Security Cooperation and Trust Building in Northeast Asia: The Role of the European Union" (2017), Nuova
- "EU-ROK relations putting the strategic partnership to work.” KF-VUB KOREA Chair Report" (2018)[URL]
- Rosamond, Ben, "The uniting of Europe and the foundation of EU studies : revisiting the neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas", European Journal of Public Policy, 12(2) (2005)
- Smith, Michael, "The European Union and China” The Logics of ‘Strategic Partnership’", Journal of Contemporary European Research, 6(4) (2010)
- Vahl, Marisu, "Just good friends? The EU-Russian ‘Strategic Partnership’ and the Northern Dimension", CEPS Working Document, (166) (2001)
- Waltz, Kenneth, "Theory of International Politics" (1979), ddison-Wesley Pubishng Company
- Wendt, Alexander, "Social Theory of International Politics" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Wiessala, Georg, "Re-Orienting the Fundaments : Human Rights and New Connections in EU-Asia Relations" (2006), Ashgate