판례 분석을 통한 한의사 의료기기 사용범위에 관한 한의학적 고찰
Study on Using Medical Devices by Korean Medical Doctors through Judicial Precedents
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The goals of this study were to analyze each of the reasons adopted by the Constitutional Court or the Courts for Decisions determined to permit the use of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors and to look at the medical devices from a Korean medical perspective. Materials and Methods: For this study, several judicial precedent databases were used for searching judicial precedents that handle the usage of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors. Prior studies on similar issues were considered. The Korean medicine textbooks and related research studies were also used in this study. Results: From 2000 to 2018, a large number of lawsuits were filed regarding the legality of Korean medicine doctors using medical devices; approximately 20 final judgments or decisions were made. Among them, only two cases determined that Korean medicine doctors could legally use medical devices. Conclusion: The decisions in both cases could be interpreted as the judgments that Korean medicine doctors were allowed to use a medical device whose use or operating principles were commonly incorporated with Korean medical principles. That was provided that training was sufficient in the use of the medical device, to the extent that it could be used and that such use of the medical device was not feared to pose a health hazard.
Abstract
Objective: The goals of this study were to analyze each of the reasons adopted by the Constitutional Court or the Courts for Decisions determined to permit the use of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors and to look at the medical devices from a Korean medical perspective. Materials and Methods: For this study, several judicial precedent databases were used for searching judicial precedents that handle the usage of medical devices by Korean medicine doctors. Prior studies on similar issues were considered. The Korean medicine textbooks and related research studies were also used in this study. Results: From 2000 to 2018, a large number of lawsuits were filed regarding the legality of Korean medicine doctors using medical devices; approximately 20 final judgments or decisions were made. Among them, only two cases determined that Korean medicine doctors could legally use medical devices. Conclusion: The decisions in both cases could be interpreted as the judgments that Korean medicine doctors were allowed to use a medical device whose use or operating principles were commonly incorporated with Korean medical principles. That was provided that training was sufficient in the use of the medical device, to the extent that it could be used and that such use of the medical device was not feared to pose a health hazard.
참고문헌 (25)
- 백태현, "한의학에서 초음파 진단기기를 활용한 장부 및 질병 관찰과 그 활용 근거", 대한한의학회지, 35(3), pp.70~92 (2014), 대한한의학회
- Bae BC, "今釋黃帝內經 靈福", pp.168~169 (2006), Seongbosa
- Park TH, "Studies on Recognition of Human Anatomy and Development of Anatomy knowledge in the Orient", Journal of Haehwa Medicine, 1(1), pp.297~318 (1992)
- Korean Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine Society, "The Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine", pp.298~ (2014), Jipmoon
- Kim YJ, "難經 硏究集成", pp.584~588 (2007), Joomin Chulpansa
- Kim SS, "The Formation and Development of East Asian Anatomy", pp.55~ (2017), Seoul National University Publishing Council
- Kwak DR, "醫林改錯評譯", pp.41~42 (1998), Seongbosa
- 성민규, "身形藏府圖에 관한 비교 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 21(3), pp.165~176 (2008), 대한한의학원전학회
- Hong WS, "中國醫學史", pp.248~249 (2001), Iljoongsa
- 안승현, "『동의보감』 신형장부도(身形藏府圖)의 형태 형성 경위에 관한 고찰", 대한한의학원전학회지, 31(4), pp.47~67 (2018), 대한한의학원전학회[DOI]
- Yeo IS, "History of medicine in Korea", pp.154~155 (2018), Yeoksagonggan
- Analysis of Post-Mortem Examination Laws in Korea and Overseas, "Lee SY", Korea Legislation Research Institute, 21~ (2015)
- Kim SM, "History of Human anatomy in Korean Medicine", The journal of Daejeon Korean Medicine, 4(1), pp.461~465 (1995)
- Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, "2017 Year Book of Traditional Korean Medicine", pp.69~108 (2019), Shinjin
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, "History of Seoul National University College of Medicine and Department of Anatomy", pp.2978~2979 (2002), Seoul National University College of Medicine and Department of Anatomy
- 사공영호, "한의사의 영상의료기기 이용규제에 관한 비판적 고찰 - 법원판례를 중심으로 -", 규제연구, 22(2), pp.225~260 (2013), 한국규제학회
- Beom KC, "Study on the walls treatment between Western and Oriental treatment Bio-Medical and Law", Life sciences and law, 2, pp.49~100 (2009)
- "National Health Insurance Data Sharing Service"[URL]
- "Healthcare Big Data Hub"[URL]
- 김기영, "의료기술의 발달과 한의사의 의료기기사용에 대한 법적 한계-뇌파계를 파킨슨병 및 치매 진단 등에 사용한 행위-", 의생명과학과법, 20, pp.5~35 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이미선, "판례분석을 통한 한방의료행위개념의 법적 근거 고찰", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 15(3), pp.19~28 (2009), 한국한의학연구원
- 박덕봉, "현대 의료기기의 사용과 한의사의 면허 범위 - 서울행정법원 2016. 6. 23. 선고 2015구합68789에 대한 평가 -", 고려법학, (83), pp.235~272 (2016), 법학연구원
- Hong JS, "Competency-based Korean Medicine Education from the Perspective of Restructuring:Strengthening Scientific Foundations and Professionalism", pp.2018
- "Homepage of each College of Korean Medicine", ~
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, "History of Seoul National University College of Medicine" (2008), Seoul National University College of Medicine