기술혁신 성과와 동적역량에 관한 연구
A Study on the relationship between dynamic capability & technology innovation performance
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we propose that investigating the relationship between the dynamic capacity and the technological innovation performance of firms. Based on the previous research, we divide the dynamic capacity into the adaptive capacity, absorption capacity, and productive capacity. Among the 3,400 companies responding to the technical statistics of SMEs in 2011, we performed multiple regression analysis with 2,807 except service industries. As a result, the absorptive capacity and productive capacity have a positive effect on the technological innovation performance at the 99% level, whereas the adaptive capacity has a negative effect on the technological innovation performance at the 95% level. The implications of this study are as follows. First, in order to improve the performance of technological innovation, it is important to strengthen the absorption capacity and productive capacity of companies. Absorption capacity shows that it is important to secure sufficient R & D manpower and R & D cost to utilize internal knowledge as well as to bring outside knowledge into the capacity to assimilate and utilize external knowledge. Second, the ability to commercialize a product is a capability to commercialize a technology that has succeeded in development, showing that the technology development organization must have the capability of post-development commercialization as well as technology development. Finally it shows the negative effect on adaptation capacity and innovation performance. Companies actively utilize external sources of information in order to respond to and adapt to the rapidly changing business environment. However, the results of this study show that a strategic approach is needed to use external sources of information and technology development resources. Especially as the use of external information resources and technology development resources increases.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose that investigating the relationship between the dynamic capacity and the technological innovation performance of firms. Based on the previous research, we divide the dynamic capacity into the adaptive capacity, absorption capacity, and productive capacity. Among the 3,400 companies responding to the technical statistics of SMEs in 2011, we performed multiple regression analysis with 2,807 except service industries. As a result, the absorptive capacity and productive capacity have a positive effect on the technological innovation performance at the 99% level, whereas the adaptive capacity has a negative effect on the technological innovation performance at the 95% level. The implications of this study are as follows. First, in order to improve the performance of technological innovation, it is important to strengthen the absorption capacity and productive capacity of companies. Absorption capacity shows that it is important to secure sufficient R & D manpower and R & D cost to utilize internal knowledge as well as to bring outside knowledge into the capacity to assimilate and utilize external knowledge. Second, the ability to commercialize a product is a capability to commercialize a technology that has succeeded in development, showing that the technology development organization must have the capability of post-development commercialization as well as technology development. Finally it shows the negative effect on adaptation capacity and innovation performance. Companies actively utilize external sources of information in order to respond to and adapt to the rapidly changing business environment. However, the results of this study show that a strategic approach is needed to use external sources of information and technology development resources. Especially as the use of external information resources and technology development resources increases.
참고문헌 (31)
- Barkema, H. G., "Management Challenges in A New Time", Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), pp.916~930 (2002)
- Amit, R., "Strategic assets and organizational rent", Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.33~46 (1993)
- Hunt, S. D., "The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition", Journal of Marketing, 59(2), pp.1~15 (1995)
- Wong, C. Y., "Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach", International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), pp.51~67 (2010)
- Barney, J. B, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17, pp.99~120 (1991)
- Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp.509~533 (1998)
- Dahlman, C. J., "The Meaning of Technological Mastery in Relation to Transfer of Technology", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 458(1), pp.12~26 (1981)
- Kline, S. J, "What Is Technology?", Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 5(3), pp.215~218 (1985)
- Aunger, R, "Types of technology", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), pp.762~782 (2010)
- Mansfield, E, "Research and innovation in the modern corporation" (1972), W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.
- Schumpeter, J. A, "The Theory of Economic Development" (1934), Harvard University Press
- Damanpour, F, "Organizational Innovation : A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators", The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp.555~590 (1972)
- 성태경, "기업의 기술혁신성과 결정요인: 전북소재기업에 대한 실증분석", 대한경영학회지, 22(4), pp.2017~2036 (2009), 대한경영학회
- 최석봉, "국내 제조기업의 기술혁신 결정요인 중요도 분석: 조직 내부역량과 외부환경을 중심으로", 산업경제연구, 24(1), pp.1~24 (2011), 한국산업경제학회
- 김한주, "연구개발 특성이 기업 연구 성과에 미치는 영향 분석", 통상정보연구, 9(4), pp.395~413 (2007), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
- Teece, D. J, "Explicating dynamic capabilities : the nature and microfoundations of(sustainable)enterprise performance", Strategic Management Journal, 128(1), pp.51~67 (2007)
- Miller, D, "Matching Strategies and Strategy Making : Process", Content, and Performance. Human Relations, 42(3), pp.241~260 (1989)
- Cohen, M. D., "Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning &innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128~152 (1990)
- 이응석, "해외진출 국내 정보통신 중소기업의 동태적 역량과 영향요인에 관한 연구", 산업경제연구, 25(2), pp.1463~1488 (2012), 한국산업경제학회[DOI]
- Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic capabilities : what are they?", Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.1105~1121 (2000)
- Helfat, C, "Know‐how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R and D", Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), pp.339~360 (1997)
- Wang, C. L., "The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis", European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), pp.303~313 (2004)
- Wang, C. L., "Dynamic capabilities : A review & research agenda", European Journal of management review, 9(1), pp.31~51 (2007)
- Chakravarthy, B, "Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management", Academy of Management Review, 7(1), pp.35~44 (1982)
- Rindova, V. P., "Continuous “Morphing”:Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function", Academy of Management Review, 44(6), pp.1263~1280 (2017)
- Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(6), pp.128~152 (1990)
- Zahra, S. A., "Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension", Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp.185~203 (2002)
- Jantunen, A., "Beyond appearances – Do dynamic capabilities of innovative firms actually differ?", European Management Journal, 30(2), pp.141~155 (2012)
- 조연성, "자원, 동적역량이 경쟁우위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 35(5), pp.275~301 (2010), 한국무역학회
- Hansen, M. T., "Knowledge sharing in organizations : Multiple networks, multiple phases", Academy of Management journal, 48(5), pp.776~793 (2005)
- Laursen, K., "Open for innovation : the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms", Strategic management journal, 27(2), pp.131~150 (2005)