본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

우리나라 제조기업의 온실가스배출 정보 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향

The Impact of Public Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Corporate Value

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 제조기업의 온실가스배출 정보 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향을 분석함에 있다. 본 연구는 온실가스종합정보센터(www.gir.go.kr)에 공시되어 있는 2011년부터 2015년까지 5년 동안 온실가스배출량(단위: tCO₂eq)과 에너지사용량(TJ), 금융감독원 전자공시시스템(https://dart.fss.or.kr/), 한국신용평가㈜의 KIS-VALUE, 한국상장기업협의회의 TS2000 등의 재무자료를 수집하고 분석 가능한 표본기업 92개를 추출하였다. 본 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 온실가스배출 유발요인이 낮을수록 기업가치가 높다는 사실을 발견하였다. 이는 온실가스배출량이 낮을수록 기업가치가 높아지며, 에너지사용량이 낮을수록 기업가치가 높아진다는 실증을보여주는 것으로 온실가스배출 유발요인을 낮추어야 한다는 점을 시사하고 있다. 둘째, 온실가스배출 저감요인이 높을수록 기업가치가 높다는 사실을 발견하였다. 온실가스감축성과가 높을수록 기업가치가 높아지며, 신재생에너지 투자활동이 활발할수록 기업가치가 높아진다는 실증을 한 것으로 온실가스배출 저감요인을 높여야 한다는 점을 시사하고 있다. 셋째, 수출을 많이 하는 기업일수록 온실가스배출 정보 공시가 기업가치에 유의한 양(+)의 영향을 미치고 있음을 밝혔다. 이는 수출지향적 사업모델을 가진 기업이 온실가스배출 정보를 적극 공시한다는 시사점을 주고 있다. 넷째, 외국인투자자지분을 높게 보유한 기업일수록 온실가스배출 정보 공시가 기업가치에 유의한양(+)의 영향을 미치고 있음을 발견하였다. 이는 우리나라 기업에 투자하는 외국인투자자가 온실가스배출 정보에 관심도가 높음을 의미한다. 국제환경규범을 준수하는 기업이 기후변화에 적절히 대응하는 것으로 여겨 투자 의사결정에 긍정적 영향을 미친다는 의미이다. 즉 해외 투자자로부터 지분투자를 받는 국내 기업이 온실가스배출 정보를 적극 공시한다는 시사점을 주고 있다. 최근 기업의 온실가스배출이 기업가치 또는 재무성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구가 미국이나 유럽, 호주 등 선진국 시장을 중심으로 활발히 진행되고 있다. 본 연구 결과는 우리나라도 이들 선행연구를 지지하는지 판단하는 연구공헌이 있다. 그리고 우리나라의 제품을 수입하는 선진국이나 국내 기업에 투자하는 외국인은 온실가스에 관심이 많다. 본 연구는 해외에 수출하거나 지분투자를받는 국내 기업에 환경경영의 중요성을 보여주는 연구공헌을 하고 있다.

Abstract

Republic of Korea was originally exempt from the reduction obligation of greenhouse gas emission up until 2020, in agreement with Kyoto Protocol outlined in 1997. However, in accordance with the Paris Climate Accord (Paris Agreement) in 2015, as the 7th ranking nation in global greenhouse gas emission, the Korean government proposed a plan to UFCCC(United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) to reduce its emission by 37% over its carbon emission forecast(business as usual: BAU), by the end of year 2030. Of the proposed reduction rate, 11.3% will be offset by overseas reduction efforts and purchasing permits from emission trading market while the other 25.7% will have to be achieved through domestic GHG reduction efforts, which includes promoting alternative energy industries, assisting companies in shifting to low carbon industry model, and increasing carbon emission reduction options through technological developments. In light of the changing environment, we deem it necessary to examine the effect the disclosure of carbon emission data has on the value of the firms employing energy target management system and climate change response policy. Amidst the growing public interest in the GHG emission and climate change, we have substantiated the correlation between the voluntarily disclosed carbon gas emission data from companies and its company values, and further take on significance in the fact that these findings have been presented to the interested parties. We have sampled and analyzed 92 companies using data for the period of 2011 to 2015, that are available to the public on GHG General Information Center(www.gir.go.kr), such as greenhouse gas emission(units: tCO2eq), energy consumption(TJ), the electronic disclosure system used by Financial Supervisory Service, KIS-VALUE employed by NICE Information Service Co., LTD. andTS2000 used by Korea Listed Companies Association. The conclusion of our study is as follows. First, we find that firms with lower greenhouse gas emission accelerating factors have higher firm values. We find implication in the fact that the lower the GHG emission and energy consumption, the higher the firm values, which indicates the need to reduce the factors that accelerate climate change. Second, we find that firms with higher greenhouse gas emission mitigating factors have higher firm values. We observe that companies successful in employing GHG reduction policy and active in investing in bio-energy division have higher firm values, an implication which also emphasizes the need to increase the factors that mitigate climate change. Third, there is a positive association between exporting companies that disclose their carbon emission data and their firm values. This finding suggests that firms planning to adopt export-oriented business model must also readily respond to the environmental issues, especially related to that of GHG emission. Fourth, we find that enterprises with higher foreign investor shares correlate positively with higher company values when disclosing voluntarily their carbon emission data. This signifies that foreigners investing in Korean firms are highly interested in GHG emission and its environmental impact. They consider companies abiding by international environmental standards as appropriately responding to climate change, which in turn positively affect their investment decision. Hence, it implies that domestic companies with foreign investment shares are more actively disclosing their carbon emission data.

참고문헌 (69)

  1. 김강, "환경경영이 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 회계와 정책연구, 14(2), pp.227~252 (2009), 한국회계정책학회
  2. 김장환, "환경경영시스템 인증획득이 기업의 재무성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구- ISO 14001 도입을 중심으로 -", 회계정보연구, 23(4), pp.1~24 (2005), 한국회계정보학회
  3. 김종대, "기업의 환경경영활동에 대한 주식시장의 평가", 대한경영학회지, 19(6), pp.2485~2512 (2006), 대한경영학회
  4. 나영, "기업규모에 따른 CSR활동과 기업가치에 대한 실증분석", 회계저널, 20(5), pp.125~160 (2011), 한국회계학회
  5. 노상환, "환경친화지정기업의 경영성과에 관한 연구", 자원환경경제연구, 13(3), pp.499~518 (2004), 한국환경경제학회
  6. 신기훈, "벤처캐피탈의 조기업적과시효과: 코스닥시장 IPO", 상업교육연구, 28(4), pp.135~157 (2014), 한국상업교육학회
  7. 윤병섭, "특허취득 활동이 경영성과에 미치는 효과 분석", 상업교육연구, 24(4), pp.261~288 (2010), 한국상업교육학회
  8. 이병욱, "환경경영론" (1997), 비봉출판사
  9. 이병욱, "환경경영 21세기 신경영 패러다임" (2005), 에코리브르
  10. 장지인, "환경회계정보, 환경성과, 재무성과의 관계에 관한 실증연구", 대한경영학회지, 22(1), pp.433~454 (2009), 대한경영학회
  11. 온실가스 감축수단으로서 천연가스 역할, 한국가스공사 용역과제, "장지인", 중앙대학교 산학협력단, ~ (2012)
  12. 전웅수, "환경회계정보 공시수준과 기업특성과의 관계에 관한 연구-우리나라 상장기업을 중심으로 한 실증연구", 기업윤리연구, 7, pp.229~253 (2003)
  13. 조희용, "한국기업의 환경성과와경영성과 관계에 관한 연구", 경영논총, 24, pp.1~46 (2000), 동국대학교 경영대학원
  14. 최종서, "An Empirical Analysis on the Relation between Corporate Environ-mental Performance and Discretionary Environmental Disclosure Using Stand-alone Environmental Reports or Supplementary Web Disclosures", 대한경영학회지, 23(1), pp.545~573 (2010), 대한경영학회
  15. 한지영, "환경경영이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 한국생산관리학회지, 23(1), pp.1~22 (2012), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  16. 허호영, "코스닥기업의 연구개발집약도와 경영자지분율이 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 상업교육연구, 27(2), pp.161~187 (2013), 한국상업교육학회
  17. 홍종호, "환경성과와 재무성과의 상관관계에 관한 실증연구 : 우리나라 상장 제조업체를 중심으로", 환경정책연구, 6(4), pp.83~102 (2007), 한국환경연구원[DOI]
  18. "국가 온실가스 인벤토리 보고서" (2016), 온실가스종합정보센터[URL]
  19. Al-Tuwaijri, S., "The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach", Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5-6), pp.447~471 (2004)
  20. Aragon-Correa, J. A., "Strategic Proactivity and Firm Approach to the Natural Environment", Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), pp.556~567 (1998)
  21. Barth, M. E., "The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard-Setting: Another View", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, pp.77~104 (2001)
  22. Barth, M. E., "Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Relating to Superfund Sites", Journal of Accounting Research, 32(Supplement), pp.177~209 (1994)
  23. Corporate Environmental Management and Credit Risk, "Bauer, R.", University Maastricht, The European Centre for Corporate Engagement, ~ (2010)
  24. Bebbington, J., "Carbon Trading: Accounting and Reporting Issues", European Accounting Review, 17(4), pp.697~717 (2008)
  25. Bragdon, Jr. J. H., "Is Pollution Profitable?", Risk Management, 19(1), pp.9~18 (1972)
  26. Brammer, S., "Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures", Financial Management, 35(3), pp.97~116 (2006)
  27. Chapple, L., "The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)", Abacus, 49(1), pp.1~33 (2013)
  28. Clarkson, P. M., "The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme", Journal European Accounting Review, 24(3), pp.551~580 (2015)
  29. Cohen, M. A., "Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related?" (1997), Investor Responsibility Research Center, Inc.
  30. Deutsche Bank, "Australian Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: De-Carbonising the CPRS" (2009)
  31. Dooley, R. S., "Pollution, Profits and Stakeholders: The Constraining Effect of Economic Performance on CEO Concern with Stakeholder Expectations", Journal of Business Ethics, 13, pp.701~711 (1994)
  32. Dowell, G., "Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?", Management Science, 46(8), pp.1059~1074 (2000)
  33. Epstein, M. J., "Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts" (2008), Berrett Koehler
  34. Financial Reporting for Cap-and-Trade Emissions Reduction Program, "Ertimur, Y.", Duke University, ~ (2011)
  35. Fisher, K., "Environmental Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications" (1993), Island Press
  36. Gale, B. T., "Formulation a Quality Improvement Strategy", Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), pp.31~32 (1985)
  37. Garrod B., "Business Strategies, Globalization and Environment in Globalization and Environment", pp.269~314 (1997), OECD
  38. Godfrey, P. C., "The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risks Management Hypothesis", Strategic Management Journal, 30, pp.425~445 (2009)
  39. Hart, S. L., "A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm", Academy of Management Review, 20(4), pp.986~1014 (1995)
  40. Harrison, J. L., "Law and Economic", pp.2007, Thomson
  41. Hardin, G., "The Tragedy of the Commons", Science, 162(3859), pp.1243~1248 (1968)
  42. Haupt, M., "The EU Emissions Trading System under IFRS-Towards a "True and Fair View", Accounting in Europe, 10(1), pp.71~97 (2013)
  43. Hutchinson, J. W., "Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials", Advances in Applied Mechanics, 29, pp.63~191 (1992)
  44. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC", IPCC, 151~ (2014)
  45. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC", IPCC, 104~ (2007)
  46. Johnston, D. M., "The Value Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances: An Exploratory Study in the Related United States SO2 Market", European Accounting Review, 17, pp.747~764 (2008)
  47. Jung, J., "Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing", Journal of Business Ethics, 2016 (2016)[DOI]
  48. Kalt, J., "International Competitiveness" (1988), Harper and Row
  49. Kleimeier, S., "Carbon Disclosure, Emission Levels, and the Cost of Debt, RM", 16, Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, Graduate School of Business and Economics(GSBE), pp.2016, ~
  50. Konar, S., "Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?", Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), pp.281~289 (2001)
  51. Ella Mae Matsumura, "Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures", The Accounting Review, 89(2), pp.695~724 (2014), American Accounting Association[DOI]
  52. McWilliams, A., "Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification", Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.603~609 (2000)
  53. Construction of Chinese Energy and Emissions Inventory, "Peters, G. P.", Norwegian University of Science and Technology, ~ (2006)
  54. Voluntary Environmental Disclosure Quality and Firm Value: Further Evidence, "Plumlee, M.", The University of Utah and Portland State University, ~ (2010)
  55. Porter, M., "Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), pp.97~118 (1995)
  56. Price waterhouse Coopers, "Do Investors Care About Sustainability?, Seven Trends Provide Clues" (2012), PwC
  57. Reinhardt, F., "Market Failure and the Environmental Policies of Firms", Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3 (1999)
  58. Roberts, P. W., "The Value of a Firm’s Corporate Reputation: How Reputation Helps Attain and Sustain Superior Profitability", Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1, pp.2) (1997), 72~76
  59. Roberts, P. W., "Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance", Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), pp.1077~1093 (2002)
  60. Saka, C., "Market Valuation of Corporate CO2 Emissions Disclosure and Emissions Trading", 학술연구발표회 발표논문 (2010), 한국회계학회
  61. Saka, C., "Disclosure Effects, Carbon Emissions and Corporate Value Sustainability Accounting", Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), pp.22~45 (2014)[DOI]
  62. Simnett, R., "Assurance on Sustainability Reports: An International Comparison", Accounting Review, 84(3), pp.937~967 (2009)
  63. Spicer, B. H., "Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study", Accounting Review, 53(1), pp.94~111 (1978)
  64. Stanny, E., "Corporate Environmental Disclosures about the Effects of Climate Change", Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, pp.338~348 (2008)
  65. Ullmann, A. A., "Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms", Academy of Management Review, 10(3), pp.540~557 (1985)
  66. Competing Accounting Treatments for Emission Rights: A Capital Market Perspective, "Veith, S.", University of Bremen, ~ (2009)
  67. Waddock, S. A., "The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link", Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), pp.303~319 (1997)
  68. Walley, N., "It’s Not Easy being Green", Harvard Business Review, 72(3), pp.46~52 (1994)
  69. Wang, L., "Do Greenhouse Gas Emissions Affect Financial Performance?–An Empirical Examination of Australian Public Firms", Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, pp.505~519 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)