Comparison of MBA and HPLC Post-column Oxidation Methods for the Quantification of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning Toxins
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The mouse bioassay and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) post-column oxidation method are different methods of quantifying paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins. In this study, we compared their ability to accurately quantify the toxicity levels in two types of field sample (oysters and mussels) with different toxin profiles for routine regulatory monitoring. A total of 72 samples were analyzed by both methods, 44 of which gave negative results, with readings under the limit of detection of the mouse bioassay (40 μg/100 g saxitoxin [STX] eq). In 14 oysters, the major toxin components were gonyautoxin (GTX) 1, -2, -3, -4, -5, decarbamoylgonyautoxin-2 (dcGTX2), and decarbamoylsaxitoxin (dcSTX), while 14 mussels tested positive for dcSTX, GTX2,-3, -4, -5, dcGTX2, neosaxitoxin (NEO), STX, and dcSTX. When the results obtained by both methods were compared in two matrices, a better correlation (r2 = 0.9478) was obtained for mussels than for oysters (r2 = 0.8244). Additional studies are therefore needed in oysters to investigate the differences in the results obtained by both methods. Importantly, some samples with toxin levels around the legal limit gave inconsistent results using HPLC-based techniques, which could have a strong economic impact due to enforced harvest area closure. It should therefore be determined if all paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins can be quantified accurately by HPLC, and if the uncertainties of the method lead to doubts regarding regulatory limits.
Abstract
The mouse bioassay and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) post-column oxidation method are different methods of quantifying paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins. In this study, we compared their ability to accurately quantify the toxicity levels in two types of field sample (oysters and mussels) with different toxin profiles for routine regulatory monitoring. A total of 72 samples were analyzed by both methods, 44 of which gave negative results, with readings under the limit of detection of the mouse bioassay (40 μg/100 g saxitoxin [STX] eq). In 14 oysters, the major toxin components were gonyautoxin (GTX) 1, -2, -3, -4, -5, decarbamoylgonyautoxin-2 (dcGTX2), and decarbamoylsaxitoxin (dcSTX), while 14 mussels tested positive for dcSTX, GTX2,-3, -4, -5, dcGTX2, neosaxitoxin (NEO), STX, and dcSTX. When the results obtained by both methods were compared in two matrices, a better correlation (r2 = 0.9478) was obtained for mussels than for oysters (r2 = 0.8244). Additional studies are therefore needed in oysters to investigate the differences in the results obtained by both methods. Importantly, some samples with toxin levels around the legal limit gave inconsistent results using HPLC-based techniques, which could have a strong economic impact due to enforced harvest area closure. It should therefore be determined if all paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins can be quantified accurately by HPLC, and if the uncertainties of the method lead to doubts regarding regulatory limits.
참고문헌 (17)
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists, "AOAC Official Method 959.08. Paralytic shellfish poison. Biological method, In AOAC Official Methods of Analysis", pp.79~80 (2005), AOAC International
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists, "Paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in shellfish. Prechromatographic oxidation and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. First action 2005, official method 2005.06, In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International", pp.83~ (2006), AOAC International
- Balls MB, "The three Rs: the way forward: the report and recommendation of ECVAM Workshop 11", Altem Lab Anim, 23, pp.883~866 (1995)
- Ben-Gigirey B, "Interlaboratory study for the extension of the validation of 2005.06 AOAC Official Method for dc-GTX-2,3", J AOAC, 95, pp.1~13 (2012)
- Botana LM, "Phycotoxins: paralytic shellfish poisoning and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning, In Handbook of Food Analysis", pp.1147~1169 (1996), Marcel Dekker Inc.
- DeGrasse SL, "Pre- versus post-column oxidation liquid chromatography fluorescence detection of paralytic shellfish toxins", Toxicon, 57, pp.619~624 (2011)[DOI]
- Diener M, "Determination of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins in dietary supplements by application of a new HPLC", FD method, 2006, pp.224, 147~151
- Hess P, "Three Rs approaches in marine biotoxin testing: the report and recommendations of a Joint ECVAM", DG SANCO Workshop (ECVAM Workshop 54), 2006, pp.34, 193~224
- Korea Food and Drug Administration, "Korean Food Standard. Chapter 2", Korea Food and Drug Administration, 2~26 (2013)
- Luckas B, "Analytical methods for paralytic shellfish poisons, In Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae", pp.191~209 (2004), UNESCO Publishing
- Park DL, "Variability of mouse bioassay for determination of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins", J Assoc Off Anal Chem, 69, pp.547~550 (1986)
- Rourke WA, "Rapid postcolumn methodology for determination of paralytic shellfish toxins in shellfish tissue", J AOAC Int, 91, pp.589~597 (2008)
- 송기철, "굴과 진주담치 중 마비성 패류독소 분석을 위한 HPLC post-column oxidation method의 시험소 내 유효성 검증", 한국식품과학회지, 45(2), pp.241~247 (2013), 한국식품과학회[DOI]
- Turner AD, "Single-laboratory validation of a refined AOAC HPLC method 2005.06 for oysters, cockles and clams in U.K. shellfish", J AOAC Int, 93, pp.1482~1493 (2010)
- Turner AD, "Investigations into matrix components affecting the performance of the official bioassay reference method for quantitation of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in oysters", Toxicon, 59, pp.215~230 (2012)[DOI]
- Guide for the Control of Molluscan Shellfish, 2007 revision, "US Food and Drug Administration", Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, ~ (2009)
- Wiese M, "Neurotoxic alkaloids: saxitoxin and its analogs", Mar Drugs, 8, pp.2185~2211 (2010)[DOI]