지속가능한 어업인증제도와 어업개선사업에 관한 연구
Sustainable Fishery Certification Scheme and Fishery Improvement Projects
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Despite international laws and government efforts, most of the world’s fishery resources and ecosystems have continued to decline since the 1970s. In response, international non-governmental organizations have launched sustainable seafood movements and attempted various strategic approaches. These include the “boycott” strategy of the 1980s and 1990s, and the expansion of certified fisheries through Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) in the 2000s. According to data from the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), currently there are 274 MSC-certified fisheries in 63 countries, covering 179 species, and 264 fisheries engaged in FIPs in 67 countries, covering 233 species. In Korea, the adoption of private fishery governance, which complements international and domestic fishery laws and government management, remains relatively low. Therefore, we examined private fishery governance with respect to its governance, interaction with laws, credibility, legitimacy, current status, and key considerations for its implementation. We emphasize the utilizing MSC fishery certification schemes as an audit approach to sustainability, implementating FIPs to address the fisheries sustainability gap, using councils for leadership, and securing government financing for fisheries with no market incentives.
Abstract
Despite international laws and government efforts, most of the world’s fishery resources and ecosystems have continued to decline since the 1970s. In response, international non-governmental organizations have launched sustainable seafood movements and attempted various strategic approaches. These include the “boycott” strategy of the 1980s and 1990s, and the expansion of certified fisheries through Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) in the 2000s. According to data from the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), currently there are 274 MSC-certified fisheries in 63 countries, covering 179 species, and 264 fisheries engaged in FIPs in 67 countries, covering 233 species. In Korea, the adoption of private fishery governance, which complements international and domestic fishery laws and government management, remains relatively low. Therefore, we examined private fishery governance with respect to its governance, interaction with laws, credibility, legitimacy, current status, and key considerations for its implementation. We emphasize the utilizing MSC fishery certification schemes as an audit approach to sustainability, implementating FIPs to address the fisheries sustainability gap, using councils for leadership, and securing government financing for fisheries with no market incentives.
참고문헌 (50)
- Arton A, "What do we know about the impacts of the Marine Stewardship Council seafood ecolabelling program? A systematic map", Environ Evid, 9, pp.6~ (2020)[DOI]
- Status of Certification System Operation. Audit report, "BAI (The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea)", 1~77 (2015)
- Barr R, "Fisheries improvement projects and small-scale fisheries : The need for a modified approach", Mar Policy, 105, pp.109~115 (2019)[DOI]
- Bush SR, "Governing Sustainable Seafood", pp.1~218 (2019), Routledge Press
- Butterworth DS, "The South African experience with MSC certification : A perspective", Fish Res, 182, pp.124~127 (2016)[DOI]
- Cannon J, "Fishery improvement projects : Performance over the past decade", Mar Policy, 97, pp.179~187 (2018)[DOI]
- Guidelines for Supporting Fishery Improvement Projects, "CASS(Conservation Alliance for Seafood Solutions)", CASS, 1~26 (2022)
- "Summary Findings from the Global Landscape Review of Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs)" (2015)[URL]
- 2020 Global Landscape Review of Fishery Improvement Projects, "CEA Consulting", CEA Consulting, 1~221 (2020)
- Crespo JP, "Bycatch and the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC): A review of the efficacy of the MSC certification scheme in tackling the bycatch of non-target species", Ninth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group, pp.1~39 (2019), Birdlift International
- Crona B, "Fishery improvement projects as a governance tool for fisheries sustainability : A global comparative analysis", PLoS One, 14, pp.e0223054~ (2019)[DOI]
- FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), "Indicators for Sustainable Development of Marine Capture Fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries", FAO, 1~68 (1999)
- Gulbrandsen LH, "The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council", Mar Policy, 33, pp.654~660 (2009)[DOI]
- Gutierrez NL, "The current situation and prospects of fisheries certification and ecolabelling", Fish Res, 182, pp.1~6 (2016)[DOI]
- The global fishing index: Assessing the sustainability of the world’s marine fisheries, "Minderoo Foundation", 1~60 (2021)
- IOI(International Ocean Institute), "The future of ocean governance and capacity development. Essays in honor of Elisabeth Mann Borgese (1918-2002)", pp.1~562 (2018), IOI
- Johnsen JP, "The cyborgization of the fisheries : On attempts to make fisheries management possible", MAST, 7, pp.9~34 (2009)
- Karavias M, "Interactions between international law and private fisheries certification", Transnatl Environ Law, 7, pp.165~184 (2018)[DOI]
- Lallemand P, "Estimating the economic benefits of MSC certification for the South African hake trawl fishery", Fish Res, 182, pp.98~115 (2016)[DOI]
- The IUU Fishing Index, 2019. Report of Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Limited and the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, "Macfadyen G", Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, 1~63 (2019)
- The IUU Fishing Index, 2021. Report of Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, "Macfadyen G", 1~68 (2021)
- The IUU Fishing Risk Index:2023 Update. Report of Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, "Macfadyen G", 1~72 (2023)
- Melnychuk MC, "Fisheries management impacts on target species status", PNAS, 114, pp.178~183 (2017)[DOI]
- Melnychuk MC, "Wild-caught fish populations targeted by MSC-certified fisheries have higher relative abundance than non-MSC populations", Front Mar Sci, 9, pp.1~21 (2022)[DOI]
- Global Impacts Report 2017, "MSC(Marine Stewardship Council)", MSC, 1~44 (2017)
- MSC(Marine Stewardship Council), "MSC Fisheries Standard Version 3.0", MSC, 1~147 (2022)
- MSC(Marine Stewardship Council), "MSC Client Document Checklist", MSC, 1~20 (2022)
- Annual Report 2022-2023, "MSC(Marine Stewardship Council)", MSC, 1~46 (2023)
- "MSC Certification Information for Korea’s Distant-water Fisheries" (2004)[URL]
- "OECD Review of Fisheries 2022. Trade and Agriculture Directorate Fisheries Committee report" (2022)[URL]
- "SDG Tracker: Measuring Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals" (2023)[URL]
- Stratoudakis Y, "Fisheries certification in the developing world : Locks and keys or square pegs in round holes?", Fish Res, 182, pp.39~49 (2016)[DOI]
- Packer H, "Social networks and seafood sustainability governance : Exploring the relationship between social capital and the performance of fishery improvement projects", People Nat, 2, pp.797~810 (2020)[DOI]
- Parkes G, "Behind the signs-A global review of fish sustainability information schemes", Rev Fish Sci, 18, pp.344~356 (2010)[DOI]
- Parlee CE, "Whose audit is it? Harnessing the power of audit culture in conditions of legal pluralism", J Leg Plur Unoff Law, 47, pp.96~111 (2015)[DOI]
- Pierucci A, "A global review of MSC certification : Why fisheries withdraw?", Mar Pol, 143, pp.105124~ (2022)[DOI]
- Rayfuse R, "Developments in International Fisheries Law", pp.107~158 (1999), Brill Press
- Roheim CA, "Evolution and future of the sustainable seafood market", Nat Sustain, 1, pp.392~398 (2018)[DOI]
- Samerwong P, "Metagoverning aquaculture standards : A comparison of the GSSI, the ASEAN GAP, and the ISEAL", J Environ Dev, 26, pp.429~451 (2017)[DOI]
- Samy-Kamal M, "Fishery improvement projects(FIPs) : A global analysis of status and performance", Fish Res, 240, pp.105987~ (2021)[DOI]
- Schiller L, "Rapidly increasing eco-certification coverage transforming management of world’s tuna fisheries", Fish Fishe, 22, pp.592~604 (2021)[DOI]
- "SFP Target 75:2022 Sectors Status Update" (2023)[URL]
- Stratoudakis Y, "Fisheries certification in the developing world : Locks and keys or square pegs in round holes?", Fish Res, 182, pp.39~49 (2016)[DOI]
- Sumaila UR, "Seas, oceans and fisheries : A challenge for good governance", Round Table, 101, pp.157~166 (2012)[DOI]
- Sutton M, "Seafood Ecolabelling", pp.403~415 (2008), Wiley-Blackwell Press
- Travaille KT, "The market for sustainable seafood drives transformative change in fishery social-ecological systems", Global Environ Change, 57, pp.101919~ (2019)[DOI]
- van Putten I, "Shifting focus : The impacts of sustainable seafood certification", PLoS One, 15, pp.e0235602~ (2020)[DOI]
- Private Standards and Certification in Fisheries and Aquaculture: Current Practice and Emerging Issues, "Washington S", FAO, 1~181, pp.FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 553 (2011)
- "Seafood Stewardship Index" (2023)[URL]
- Woronoff J, "Blue Planet Law", pp.187~198 (2023), Springer Nature