한국과 주요 선진 어업관리국의 TAC제도 운영에 관한 비교연구

Abstract

This study examines Korea’s Total Allowable Catch (TAC) system using the “TAC machine” conceptual framework, a cybernetic loop involving data collection, stock assessment, scientific advice, policy decision-making and implementation. Building on this conceptual foundation, the study compares Korea’s TAC system with those of the U.S., Australia, and Japan to analyze how boundary objects, boundary organizations, and standardized packages facilitate co-production among scientists, policymakers, and stakeholders. While Korea has introduced the institutional components of TAC machines, the system has failed to operate as an integrated governance structure. Major limitations include the limited availability and quality of data, which have resulted in lower-tier stock assessments; the absence of legally established boundary organizations to mediate between science and policy, and the lack of standardized fisheries management plans (FMPs). Drawing on international best practices, this study recommends the following institutional reforms to ensure functional coherence and overall sustainability of Korean fisheries through a more coherent and functional TAC system: building an internationally standardized data collection framework, implementation of precautionary buffers within the tier system, legal establishment of boundary organization, full adoption of FMPs, including HCR and MCS strategies, and integration of fisheries-related laws.