The study of fractural behavior of repaired composite
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Objectives: This study evaluated microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and short-rod fracture toughness to explain fractural behavior of repaired composite restorations according to different surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Thirty composite blocks for μTBS test and sixty short-rod specimens for fracture toughness test were fabricated and were allocated to 3 groups according to the combination of surface treatment (none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening). Each group was repaired immediately and 2weeks later. Twenty-four hours later from repair, μTBS and fracture toughness test were conducted. Mean values analyzed with two-way ANOVA / Tukey’s B test (α= 0.05) and correlation analysis was done between μTBS and fracture toughness. FE-SEM was employed on fractured surface to examine the crack propagation. Results: The fresh composite resin showed higher μTBS than the aged composite resin (p < 0.001). Mechanically treated groups showed higher bond strength than non-mechanically treated groups except none-treated fresh group in μTBS (p < 0.05). The fracture toughness value of mechanically treated surface was higher than that of non-mechanically treated surface (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between fracture toughness and microtensile bond strength values. Specimens having high KIC showed toughening mechanism including crack deviation, microcracks and crack bridging in FE-SEM. Conclusions: Surface treatment by mechanical interlock is more important for effective composite repair,and the fracture toughness test could be used as an appropriate tool to examine the fractural behavior of the repaired composite with microtensile bond strength. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2010;35(6):461-472.]
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and short-rod fracture toughness to explain fractural behavior of repaired composite restorations according to different surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Thirty composite blocks for μTBS test and sixty short-rod specimens for fracture toughness test were fabricated and were allocated to 3 groups according to the combination of surface treatment (none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening). Each group was repaired immediately and 2weeks later. Twenty-four hours later from repair, μTBS and fracture toughness test were conducted. Mean values analyzed with two-way ANOVA / Tukey’s B test (α= 0.05) and correlation analysis was done between μTBS and fracture toughness. FE-SEM was employed on fractured surface to examine the crack propagation. Results: The fresh composite resin showed higher μTBS than the aged composite resin (p < 0.001). Mechanically treated groups showed higher bond strength than non-mechanically treated groups except none-treated fresh group in μTBS (p < 0.05). The fracture toughness value of mechanically treated surface was higher than that of non-mechanically treated surface (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between fracture toughness and microtensile bond strength values. Specimens having high KIC showed toughening mechanism including crack deviation, microcracks and crack bridging in FE-SEM. Conclusions: Surface treatment by mechanical interlock is more important for effective composite repair,and the fracture toughness test could be used as an appropriate tool to examine the fractural behavior of the repaired composite with microtensile bond strength. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2010;35(6):461-472.]
참고문헌 (40)
- Papacchini F, "Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition", J Adhes Dent, 9(1), pp.25~31 (2007)
- Suh BI, "Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry", J Esthet Restor Dent, 16(5), pp.316~323 (2004)
- Rodrigues SA Jr, "Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials", Dent Mater, 23(4), pp.442~451 (2009)
- Fawzy AS, "Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite", J Dent, 36(12), pp.969~976 (2008)
- Cavalcanti AN, "Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites", J Esthet Restor Dent, 19(2), pp.90~98 (2007)
- Teixeira EC BS, "Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites", J Adhes Dent, 7(2), pp.159~164 (2005)
- Tezvergil A, "Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers", J Dent, 31(8), pp.521~525 (2003)
- Brosh T, "Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites", J Prosthet Dent, 77(2), pp.122~126 (1997)
- Bonstein T, "Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin", J Adhes Dent, 7(1), pp.41~49 (2005)
- Cesar PF, "Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments", Am J Dent, 14(6), pp.373~377 (2001)
- Mecholsky JJ Jr, "Fracture mechanics principles", Dent Mater, 11(2), pp.111~112 (1995)
- Tam LE, "Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer", dentin interfaces, 1995, pp.20(4), 144~150
- 류길주, "상아질-복합레진 접착계면의 파괴거동에 대한 연구", 대한치과보존학회지, 32(3), pp.208~221 (2007), 대한치과보존학회
- Dhuru VB, "The fracture toughness of repaired composite", J Oral Rehabil, 13(5), pp.413~421 (1986)
- Tam LE, "Fracture toughness of dentin", resin-composite adhesive interfaces, 1993, pp.72(5), 953~959
- Tam LE, "Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin-composite adhesive interface", J Dent Res, 73(9), pp.1530~1538 (1994)
- Barker LM, "A simplified methods for measuring plane strain fracture toughness", Eng Fract Mech, 9, pp.361~369 (1977)
- Tam LE, "Fracture surface characterization of dentin-bonded interfacial fracture toughness specimens", J Dent Res, 73(3), pp.607~619 (1994)
- 이연신, "기질레진의 조성에 따른 복합레진의 물리적 성질에 관한 연구", 대한치과보존학회지, 27(1), pp.77~86 (2002), 대한치과보존학회
- Ruyter IE, "Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion", J Biomed Mater Res, 21(1), pp.11~23 (1987)
- Filho JD, "Degree of conversion and plasticization of dimethacrylate-based polymeric matrices: influence of light-curing mode", J Oral Sci, 50(3), pp.315~321 (2008)
- Sturdevant CM, "Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed", pp.201~203 (2006)
- Goncalves F, "Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites", Eur J Oral Sci, 117(4), pp.442~446 (2009)
- Eick JD, "Current concepts on adhesion to dentin", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 8(3), pp.306~335 (1997)
- Lapcl′k L Jr JJ, "Electron paramagnetic resonance study of free-radical kinetics in ultraviolet- light cured dimethacrylate copolymers", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 9(5), pp.257~262 (1998)
- Miyazaki M, "Determination of residual double bonds in resin-dentin interface by Raman spectroscopy", Dent Mater, 19(3), pp.245~251 (2003)
- Cavalcanti AN, "Microleakage at the Composite-repair Interface: Effect of Different Surface Treatment Methods", Oper Dent, 30(1), pp.113~117 (2005)
- Lovell LG, "The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins", J Dent Res, 78(8), pp.1469~1476 (1999)
- Santerre JP, "Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 12(2), pp.136~151 (2001)
- Ye Q, "Relationship of solvent to the photopolymerization process, properties, and structure in model dentin adhesives", J Biomed Mater Res A, 80(2), pp.342~350 (2007)
- Passos SP, "Bond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repair", J Adhes Dent, 9(5), pp.443~447 (2007)
- 최수영, "수리된 복합레진 수복물의 전단결합강도 연구", 대한치과보존학회지, 27(6), pp.569~576 (2002), 대한치과보존학회
- Ferracane JL, "Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites", J Dent Res, 71(1), pp.13~19 (1992)
- Craig RG, "Restorative Dental Materials 11th" (2002), Mosby
- Nalla R K, "Effect of orientation on the in vitro fracture toughness of dentin: the role of toughening mechanisms", Biomaterials, 24(22), pp.3955~3968 (2003)
- Young RJ, "Failure of brittle polymers by slow crack growth. Part 2. Failure processes in a silica particle-filled epoxy resin composite", J Mater Sci, 101, pp.343~1350 (1975)
- Kim KH, "Microfracture mechanisms of dental resin composites containing spherically-shaped filler particles", J Dent Res, 73(2), pp.499~504 (1994)
- KIM SC, "Polymer Engeneering I", 287~310 (1994)
- Soderholm KJ, "Review of the fracture toughness approach", Dent Mater, 26(2), pp.63~77 (2010)
- Kruzic JJ, "Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration", Biomaterials, 24(28), pp.5209~5221 (2003)
