본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

치조정 골흡수에 대한 platform switching이 미치는 영향

Influence of platform switching on crestal bone resorption

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: Numerous studies have shown that crestal bone resorption around the implant was related to the location of the implant abutment junction(IAJ). Recently it was hypothesized that platform switching termed the inward horizontal repositioning of the IAJ might limit bone resorption around the implants. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of platform switching on crestal bone resorption.Materials and Methods: The crestal bone loss of 65 external hex implants in 26 patients were radiographically measured at crown placement and follow-up examinations. 23 standard implants(non-platform switching group, NP) were connected with the matching abutments and 42 wide implants(platform switching group, PS) were connected with the 1 mm smaller diameter abutments.Results: There was significant difference of crestal bone loss between NP group and PS group. For implants in the NP group, mean crestal bone loss was 1.18±0.68mm at crown placement and 1.42±0.41mm at follow-up. The meal bone loss in PS group was 0.47±0.52mm at crown placement and 0.60±0.65mm at follow-up. When the crestal bone changes according to placement depths of implants were compared, subcrestal position of IAJ had a significantly less bone loss in PS group, but it was not in NP group.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that platform switching technique might decrease crestal bone loss around the implants. Additionally, when the IAJ of implant was placed 1 mm deeper in the alveolar bone, the effect of platform switching on bone loss was enhanced. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:135-142)

Abstract

Purpose: Numerous studies have shown that crestal bone resorption around the implant was related to the location of the implant abutment junction(IAJ). Recently it was hypothesized that platform switching termed the inward horizontal repositioning of the IAJ might limit bone resorption around the implants. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of platform switching on crestal bone resorption.Materials and Methods: The crestal bone loss of 65 external hex implants in 26 patients were radiographically measured at crown placement and follow-up examinations. 23 standard implants(non-platform switching group, NP) were connected with the matching abutments and 42 wide implants(platform switching group, PS) were connected with the 1 mm smaller diameter abutments.Results: There was significant difference of crestal bone loss between NP group and PS group. For implants in the NP group, mean crestal bone loss was 1.18±0.68mm at crown placement and 1.42±0.41mm at follow-up. The meal bone loss in PS group was 0.47±0.52mm at crown placement and 0.60±0.65mm at follow-up. When the crestal bone changes according to placement depths of implants were compared, subcrestal position of IAJ had a significantly less bone loss in PS group, but it was not in NP group.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that platform switching technique might decrease crestal bone loss around the implants. Additionally, when the IAJ of implant was placed 1 mm deeper in the alveolar bone, the effect of platform switching on bone loss was enhanced. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:135-142)

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
  2. Albrektsson T, "Eriksson RA. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
  3. Jung YC, "A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 11, pp.811~818 (1996)
  4. Tarnow DP, "The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest", J Periodontal, 71, pp.546~549 (2000)
  5. Grunder U, "Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.113~119 (2005)
  6. Duyck J, "Van Oosterwyck H et al. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.207~218 (2001)
  7. Quirynen M, "Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.104~111 (1992)
  8. Hermann JS, "Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible", J Periodontol, 68, pp.1117~1130 (1997)
  9. Hermann JS, "Biologic width around one-and two-piece titanium implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.559~571 (2001)
  10. Piattelli A, "Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1146~1150 (2001)
  11. Persson LG, "Bacterial colonization of internal surfaces of Branemark system implant components", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.90~95 (1996)
  12. Ericsson I, "Different types of inflammatory reactions in periimplant soft tissue", J Clin Periodontol, 22, pp.255~261 (1995)
  13. Ericsson I, "Radiographical and histological characteristics of submerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. An experimental study in the Labrador dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.20~26 (1996)
  14. Abrahamsson I, "Soft tissue response to plaque formation at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.73~79 (1998)
  15. Berglundh T, "Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited", J Clin Periiodontol, 23, pp.971~973 (1996)
  16. Abrahamsson I, "The peri-implant hard and soft tissue ant different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.212~219 (1996)
  17. Weber HP, "Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants. A histometric study in beagle dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.11~19 (1996)
  18. Moon I-S, "The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 26, pp.658~663 (1999)
  19. Hermann JS, "Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.1~11 (2000)
  20. Gardner DM, "Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. A case study", N Y state Dent J, 71, pp.34~37 (2005)
  21. Lazzara RJ, "Platform switching: A New concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 26, pp.9~17 (2006)
  22. Todescan FF, "Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: A histomorphometric study in dogs", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 17, pp.467~472 (2002)
  23. Piattelli A, "Microscopical aspects of failure in osseointegrated dental implants: a report of five cases", Biomater, 17, pp.1235~1241 (1996)
  24. Eriksson RA, "The effect of heat on bone regeneration", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42, pp.701~711 (1984)
  25. Wilderman MN, "Histogenesis of repair after osseous surgery", J Periodontol, 41, pp.551~565 (1970)
  26. Gomez-Roman G, "Influence of flap design on peri-implant interproximal crestal bone loss around single tooth implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 16, pp.61~67 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)