The influence of the implant-abutment complex on marginal bone and periimplant conditions: A retrospective study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The design of the implant-abutment complex is thought to be responsible for marginal bone loss (MBL) and might affect the condition of the peri-implant tissues. This the present study aimed to evaluate the influence of the implant-abutment complex on MBL and the peri-implant tissues in partially edentulous patients treated with dental implants and determine the most advantageous design. Materials and Methods. A total of ninety-one endosseous implants with different designs of implant-abutment complex [tissue level-TL (n = 30), platform switch-PS (n = 18), and platform match-PM (n = 43)] were reviewed for MBL, Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP). MBL was calculated for first year of the insertion and the following years. Results. The median MBL for the PM implants (2.66 ± 1.67 mm; n = 43) in the first year was significantly higher than those for the other types (P =.033). The lowest rate of MBL (0.61 ± 0.44 mm; n = 18) was observed with PS implants (P =.000). The position of the crown-abutment border showed a statistically significant influence (P =.019) and a negative correlation (r=-0.395) on MBL. BoP was found significantly higher in PM implants (P =.006). The lowest BoP scores were detected in PS implants, but the difference was not significant (P =.523). The relation between PPD and connection type revealed no statistically significant influence (P >.05). Conclusion. Within the limitations of the present study, it may be concluded that PS implants seem to show better peri-implant soft tissue conditions and cause less MBL.
Abstract
Purpose. The design of the implant-abutment complex is thought to be responsible for marginal bone loss (MBL) and might affect the condition of the peri-implant tissues. This the present study aimed to evaluate the influence of the implant-abutment complex on MBL and the peri-implant tissues in partially edentulous patients treated with dental implants and determine the most advantageous design. Materials and Methods. A total of ninety-one endosseous implants with different designs of implant-abutment complex [tissue level-TL (n = 30), platform switch-PS (n = 18), and platform match-PM (n = 43)] were reviewed for MBL, Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP). MBL was calculated for first year of the insertion and the following years. Results. The median MBL for the PM implants (2.66 ± 1.67 mm; n = 43) in the first year was significantly higher than those for the other types (P =.033). The lowest rate of MBL (0.61 ± 0.44 mm; n = 18) was observed with PS implants (P =.000). The position of the crown-abutment border showed a statistically significant influence (P =.019) and a negative correlation (r=-0.395) on MBL. BoP was found significantly higher in PM implants (P =.006). The lowest BoP scores were detected in PS implants, but the difference was not significant (P =.523). The relation between PPD and connection type revealed no statistically significant influence (P >.05). Conclusion. Within the limitations of the present study, it may be concluded that PS implants seem to show better peri-implant soft tissue conditions and cause less MBL.
참고문헌 (39)
- Pikner SS, "Radiographic analyses of"advanced"marginal bone loss around Brånemark dental implants", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 11, pp.120~133 (2009)
- Albrektsson T, "On crestal", marginal bone loss around dental implants, 2012, pp.25, 320~322
- Goiato MC, "Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? a systematic review", Oral Maxillofac Surg, 19, pp.229~242 (2015)
- Lombardi T, "Factors influencing early marginal bone loss around dental implants positioned subcrestally : a multicenter prospective clinical study", J Clin Med, 8, pp.1168~1181 (2019)
- Pan YH, "Evaluation of the peri-implant bone level around platform-switched dental implants : a retrospective 3-year radiographic study", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16, pp.2570~2582 (2019)
- Rana V, "Bone level measurements around platform switched and platform matched implants : a comparative study", Niger J Surg, 25, pp.9~13 (2019)
- Schwarz F, "Impact of implant-abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar", microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report, 2014, pp.25, 1301~1303
- Pieri F, "Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants : a randomized controlled clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.169~178 (2011)
- Koo KT, "The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants : a radiographic analysis", J Periodontol, 83, pp.1104~1109 (2012)
- DI Girolamo M, "Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis", Oral Implantol(Rome), 9, pp.1~10 (2016)
- Wallace SS, "Significance of the ‘biologic width’ with respect to root-form implants", Dent Implantol Update, 5, pp.25~29 (1994)
- Tarnow D, "Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants", J Periodontol, 74, pp.1785~1788 (2003)
- Lee BA, "The prosthetic abutment height can affect marginal bone loss around dental implants", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.799~805 (2018)
- Hermann JS, "Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible", J Periodontol, 71, pp.1412~1424 (2000)
- de Oliveira RR, "Bone remodeling adjacent to Morse cone-connection implants with platform switch : a fluorescence study in the dog mandible", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.257~266 (2009)
- Kwon HJ, "Influence of the tooth- and implant-side marginal bone level on the interproximal papilla dimension in a single implant with a microthread, conical seal, and platform-switched design", J Periodontol, 80, pp.1541~1547 (2009)
- Hürzeler M, "Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments : preliminary data from a prospective study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.33~39 (2007)
- Degidi M, "Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing", maintaining design (‘beyond platform switch’) retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report, 2008, pp.19, 276~282
- Novaes AB Jr, "The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a morse cone connection and a platform switch : a histomorphometric study in dogs", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1839~1849 (2006)
- López-Marí L, "Implant platform switching concept : an updated review", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 14, pp.e450~e454 (2009)
- Becker J, "Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants : a histomorphometrical study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 34, pp.1089~1096 (2007)
- Lazzara RJ, "Platform switching : a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 26, pp.9~17 (2006)
- Cohen J, "A power primer", Psychol Bull, 112, pp.155~159 (1992)
- Gupta S, "Platform switching technique and crestal bone loss around the dental implants : a systematic review", Ann Afr Med, 18, pp.1~6 (2019)
- Spinato S, "Minimum abutment height to eliminate bone loss : influence of implant neck design and platform switching", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 33, pp.405~411 (2018)
- Chaytor DV, "The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: bone level changes", Int J Periodont Restor Dent, 11, pp.112~125 (1991)
- Hermann JS, "Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1372~1383 (2001)
- Lee CT, "Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis : systematic review and meta-analysis", J Dent, 62, pp.1~12 (2017)
- Hasegawa M, "Long-term radiographic evaluation of risk factors related to implant treatment : suggestion for alternative statistical analysis of marginal bone loss", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.1283~1289 (2016)
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Misch CE, "Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference", Implant Dent, 17, pp.5~15 (2008)
- Berglundh T, "A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years", J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp.197~212 (2002)
- Renvert S, "Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis : Case definitions and diagnostic considerations", J Periodontol, 89, pp.S304~S312 (2018)
- Acharya A, "Peri-implant marginal bone loss rate preand post-loading : An exploratory analysis of associated factors", Clin Oral Implants Res, 30, pp.410~419 (2019)
- Roos-Jansåker AM, "Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions", J Clin Periodontol, 33, pp.290~295 (2006)
- Meloni SM, "Platform switching vs regular platform implants : nine-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial", Eur J Oral Implantol, 7, pp.257~265 (2014)
- Doornewaard R, "How do peri-implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri-implantitis? A critical review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.100~123 (2018)
- Bergenblock S, "Longterm follow-up of CeraOne™ single-implant restorations : an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.471~479 (2012)
- Dierens M, "Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22years : radiographic and peri-implant outcome", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.197~204 (2012)
