Focus Group Interview on the Non-face-to-face real-time and non-real-time Education Service Quality: -Focusing on Students who have Studied Financial Accounting and Tax Accounting Subjects-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to COVID-19, this study started in the situation where interest in and attention to non-face-to-face education services increased at the turning point from face-to-face education services to non-face-to-face ones due to COVID-19. In the environment where non-face-to-face education services expand, concerning the quality of the non-face-to-face education service for college students and this study was conducted through Focus Group Interview (FGI) with 23 students focusing on students in financial accounting and tax accounting subjects at C. University in Jeju Province. As a result of this study, focus group interviews (FGI) were conducted for non-face-to-face real-time and non-real-time educational services. And through this qualitative study, it was attempted to find the in-depth factors that cannot be obtained through the questionnaire and to compose the KS-SQI measurement sub-factors. And in this study, the results through literature studies and FGI according to non-face-to-face real-time and non-face-to-face non-real-time educational service types are as follows. Based on the research results, 7 sub-factors of KS-SQI, including main service, These are the additional services, reliability, positivity, kindness, accessibility, and physical environment to measure the non-face-to-face education service quality based on findings through FGI and research according to the type of education services. and the questionnaire that can measure the KS-SQI (Korean Standard-Service Quality Index) was prepared and derived. Lastly, due to the vitalization of non-face-to-face education, it is necessary to utilize non-face-to-face education from various perspectives. Therefore, through this study, at the time of transition from non-face-to-face education to face-to-face education after COVID-19. This study will contribute to the qualitative activation of face-to-face education by supplementing the deficiencies in the operation method of non-face-to-face education services during the COVID-19 period. In addition, it will be able to provide useful information for designing and operating non-face-to-face classes due to COVID-19 and this study will reduce trial and error related to non-face-to-face classes in the COVID-19 situation to universities and provide financial support from the Ministry of Education as a policy. Ultimately, efforts will be made to improve the quality of face-to-face education at universities.
Abstract
Due to COVID-19, this study started in the situation where interest in and attention to non-face-to-face education services increased at the turning point from face-to-face education services to non-face-to-face ones due to COVID-19. In the environment where non-face-to-face education services expand, concerning the quality of the non-face-to-face education service for college students and this study was conducted through Focus Group Interview (FGI) with 23 students focusing on students in financial accounting and tax accounting subjects at C. University in Jeju Province. As a result of this study, focus group interviews (FGI) were conducted for non-face-to-face real-time and non-real-time educational services. And through this qualitative study, it was attempted to find the in-depth factors that cannot be obtained through the questionnaire and to compose the KS-SQI measurement sub-factors. And in this study, the results through literature studies and FGI according to non-face-to-face real-time and non-face-to-face non-real-time educational service types are as follows. Based on the research results, 7 sub-factors of KS-SQI, including main service, These are the additional services, reliability, positivity, kindness, accessibility, and physical environment to measure the non-face-to-face education service quality based on findings through FGI and research according to the type of education services. and the questionnaire that can measure the KS-SQI (Korean Standard-Service Quality Index) was prepared and derived. Lastly, due to the vitalization of non-face-to-face education, it is necessary to utilize non-face-to-face education from various perspectives. Therefore, through this study, at the time of transition from non-face-to-face education to face-to-face education after COVID-19. This study will contribute to the qualitative activation of face-to-face education by supplementing the deficiencies in the operation method of non-face-to-face education services during the COVID-19 period. In addition, it will be able to provide useful information for designing and operating non-face-to-face classes due to COVID-19 and this study will reduce trial and error related to non-face-to-face classes in the COVID-19 situation to universities and provide financial support from the Ministry of Education as a policy. Ultimately, efforts will be made to improve the quality of face-to-face education at universities.
참고문헌 (26)
- Abdullah, F., "Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1), pp.31~47 (2006)
- Alpahtani. A. Y., "E-Learning Critical Success Factors during the COVID–19Pandamic: A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Learinig Managerial Perspectives", Education Sciences, 10(9), pp.216~231 (2020)
- 정봉영, "사이버대학 학습자들의 인구학적 특성에 따른학업성취도와 수업만족도 분석- S대학교 사례를 중심으로 -", 교육정보미디어연구, 10(3), pp.127~150 (2004), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- 김병주, "온라인과 오프라인 과외교육의 비용-효과 분석", 수산해양교육연구, 21(2), pp.199~212 (2009), 한국수산해양교육학회
- 박동숙, "디지털시대의 이야기하기-상호작용성과 수용자관여-", 방송통신연구, 2002(2), pp.37~64 (2002), 한국방송학회[DOI]
- 김은희, "e-러닝의 학습참여와 학습효과 간 구조적관계에 관한 연구: 고객센터 종사자를 중심으로", 상업교육연구, 32(3), pp.47~75 (2018), 한국상업교육학회[DOI]
- 김은혜, "코로나19로 인한 비대면 원격수업의 학습참여활동에 따른 학업성취도 차이분석 : A대학교 Smart Class를 중심으로", 상업교육연구, 34(6), pp.1~21 (2020), 한국상업교육학회[DOI]
- Fernandez, M., "Examining Asynchronous and Synchronous Communication in an Online Mathematics Teacher Education Course", North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, pp.1029~1036 (2004)
- Harasim, L. M., "Online education: Perspectives on a new environment", pp.39~66 (1990), Praeger Publish
- Hill, Phill, "Percentage of US Higher ED Institutions Moving to Fully Online Delivery of Traditional Face-to-Face Courses During COVID-19 Crisis", philonedtech, ~ (2020)
- 김호겸, "조리 관련 직업전문학교 학생들이 지각하는 교육서비스품질이 학습전이에 미치는 영향에 있어 학습자만족의 매개 효과", Tourism Research, 45(2), pp.141~164 (2020), 한국관광산업학회[DOI]
- 이재왕, "온라인 토론 유형이 비판적 사고기능의 개발과 인지적 참여의 수준에 미치는 영향", 사고개발, 6(2), pp.121~143 (2010), 대한사고개발학회
- 도재우, "면대면 수업의 온라인 수업 전환과정에서 발생하는 설계 장애물에 대한 탐색", 교육문화연구, 26(2), pp.153~173 (2020), 교육연구소[DOI]
- 이종기, "4차산업과 미래설계 교양수업의 Moodle 학습관리시스템 활용 사례 연구 : 학습활동 참여의 개인차를 중심으로", 상업교육연구, 33(4), pp.25~42 (2019), 한국상업교육학회[DOI]
- Karapetrovic, S., "Creating zero‐defect students", The TQM Magazine, 9(4), pp.287~291 (1997)
- Kathy, S. J., "Academic and Service Quality in Distance Education", pp.1998
- 임걸, "오프라인 강의식 수업에서 실시간 마이크로블로그 활용 학습활동 효과 사례분석", 디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 12(2), pp.195~203 (2011), 한국디지털콘텐츠학회
- Service Marketing: new insights from consumers and managers, "Langeard, E.", Marketing Science Institute, 81~104 (1981)
- Moore, M., "Distance education: A systems view" (1996), Wadsworth
- Morgan, D. L., "Focus Group : Qualitative Method", ~ (2004)
- Roberts, J. S., "Is online instruction perceived as effective as campus instruction by graduate students in education?", Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), pp.73~86 (2005)
- Rosenberg, M. J., "e-Learning Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age" (2001), Mcgraw Hill
- 이상수, "면대면 학습 환경과 온라인 실시간", 비실시간 학습 환경에서의 상호작용 패턴 분석, 2004, pp.20(1), 63~88[DOI]
- 홍성연, "코로나19로 인한 비대면 원격교육 환경에서 대학 교양교과목의 수업성찰", 교양교육연구, 14(6), pp.283~298 (2020), 한국교양교육학회
- 홍성연, "코로나19로 인한 비대면 원격교육환경에서 학습성과 영향 요인 분석", 교육공학연구, 36(3), pp.957~989 (2020), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- Wilson, K. G., "Science and Treatment Development: Lessons from the history of behavior therapy", Behavior Therapy, 28, pp.547~558 (1997)