프랑스법상 조부모의 방문권(droit de visite)
Visitation rights of grandparents for grandchildren in French law(droit de visite)
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In modern society, family structure is changing in various ways, such as family dissolution or expansion of household members. In other words, child support has been done by a more variety of individuals, such as grandparents and a third party, as the method of child support has changed due to aging society, rising social participation of women, and increasing divorce or remarriage. Nevertheless, the legal relationship between grandparents and grandchildren hardly leads to any special legal relationship, except for child support obligation and heirship. However, there are almost no civil code provisions on marriage-based nuclear family that pertain to relatives, not to mention grandparents, nor any legal regulations or suggestions on the relationship between grandparents and grandchildren. However, since family structure is changing in the modern society, as mentioned previously, family matters in the civil code need to be changed. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring the discussion on the French law regarding visitation rights of grandparents for grandchildren. In Article 371 Section 4 of French Civil Code, visitation rights of grandparents are specified as an express provision, partly because there have been suggestions and discussion on legal regulations for visitation rights of grandparents for grandchildren for quite a while. In fact, a series of family law has been revised in large scale in French legal system since the early 20th century and that's when the visitation rights of grandparents were specified. The main purpose of this study is to review the direction of expansion and revision of visitation rights scope in Korea by exploring the relevant discussion in France until the visitation rights of grandparents were legalized. Even though Korea and France have different family valuesand family structures from each other, I believe that reviewing how a foreign law was established and developed, based on common perceptions toward changing family structure, familial relationship and affection in modern society, could be used as useful data for suggesting an universal direction on relevant legislation.
Abstract
In modern society, family structure is changing in various ways, such as family dissolution or expansion of household members. In other words, child support has been done by a more variety of individuals, such as grandparents and a third party, as the method of child support has changed due to aging society, rising social participation of women, and increasing divorce or remarriage. Nevertheless, the legal relationship between grandparents and grandchildren hardly leads to any special legal relationship, except for child support obligation and heirship. However, there are almost no civil code provisions on marriage-based nuclear family that pertain to relatives, not to mention grandparents, nor any legal regulations or suggestions on the relationship between grandparents and grandchildren. However, since family structure is changing in the modern society, as mentioned previously, family matters in the civil code need to be changed. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring the discussion on the French law regarding visitation rights of grandparents for grandchildren. In Article 371 Section 4 of French Civil Code, visitation rights of grandparents are specified as an express provision, partly because there have been suggestions and discussion on legal regulations for visitation rights of grandparents for grandchildren for quite a while. In fact, a series of family law has been revised in large scale in French legal system since the early 20th century and that's when the visitation rights of grandparents were specified. The main purpose of this study is to review the direction of expansion and revision of visitation rights scope in Korea by exploring the relevant discussion in France until the visitation rights of grandparents were legalized. Even though Korea and France have different family valuesand family structures from each other, I believe that reviewing how a foreign law was established and developed, based on common perceptions toward changing family structure, familial relationship and affection in modern society, could be used as useful data for suggesting an universal direction on relevant legislation.
참고문헌 (44)
- 김주수, "친족상속법" (2007), 법문사
- 김상용, "친족상속법" (2008), 법문사
- 김상용, "면접교섭권", 법학연구, 40(1) (1999)
- 김상용, "소위 친권행사자론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 가족법연구, (11) (1997)
- 김상용, "면접교섭권의 법적성질", 고시연구 (1999)
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2003), 박영사
- 양수산, "친족상속법" (1998), 한국외국대학교 출판부
- 이영규, "새로운 가족법 강의" (2008), 대명출판사
- 한복룡, "가족법강의" (2007), 충남대학교 출판부
- 현승종, "로마법" (2004), 법문사
- 곽민희, "프랑스법상 親權의 歸屬과 行使 —親權移任制度(la délégation de l'autorité parentale)를 中心으로—", 가족법연구, 26(3), pp.99~132 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 김은아, "조손간의 면접교섭권", 한양법학, (37), pp.179~194 (2012), 한양법학회
- 구연창, "친권제도의 재조명", 가족법연구, (4) (1990), 한국가족법학회
- 윤부찬, "조부모의 면접교섭권에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (38), pp.499~538 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 大村敦志, "家族法" (2004), 有斐閣
- 田中通裕, "フランスにおける訪問権(droit de visite)ーその権利主体の範囲と法的性質をめ ぐってー", 法と政治, 32(1) (1981)
- 谷口知平, "現代外国法典叢書仏蘭西民法(I)" (1956), 有斐閣
- Colombet, "Commentaire de la loi du 4 juin 1970, D.1971", ~
- Donnier, "L’intérêt de l’enfant", ~ (1959)
- G. Viney, "Du 《droit de visite》" (1965), R.T.D.C
- Garola-Giuliaris, "Le fondement du droit de visiter et d’héberger l’enfant", ~ (1965)
- H. Mazeaud, "Leçons de droit civil, t.1, La famille" (1995), Montchrestien
- H. Bosse-Platiére, "La présence des grands-parents dans le contentieux familial", J.C.P (1997)
- Ingeborg Schwenzer, "Model Family Code; From Global Perspective" (2006), Antwerpen-Oxford
- J. Carbonnier, "Droit civil, t.2, La famille" (1997), P.U.F.
- Juglart, "Les droits de puissance paternell des ascendants" (1938), R.T.D.C
- Encyclopédie juridique, "divorce" (1998), Dalloz
- Jean-Louis Halpérin, "Histoire du droit privé français depuis 1804" (1996), P.U.F.
- Katharina Boele- Woelki, "Principles of European Family Law Regarding Divorce and Maintenance between Former Spouse" (2004), Anwerp-Oxford
- Katharina Boele- Woelki, "Principles of European Family Law Regarding Parental Responsibilities" (2007), Anwerp-Oxford
- Kamdem, "L’enfant et le droit de visite" (1996), Gaz. Pal
- L. Josserand, "De l’esprit des droits et de leur relativité" (1927), Dalloz
- Legeais, "L’autorité parentale" (1973), Rep. Def
- M. Gobert, "L’enfant et les adultes(à propos de la loi du 4 juin 1970)" (1971), J.C.P
- Naurois, "Le contrôle judiciaire de la puissance paternelle" (1936), Rev. crit
- P. Guiho, "Essai d’une théorie général du droit de visite" (1952), J.C.P
- V. Gaston, "Essai sur le droit de visite sous la puissance paternelle" (1941)
- Pierre Catala, "proposition de loi relative aux droits du conjoint survivant(adoptée par l′ Assmblée nationale en première lecture le 8 fév. 2001)", JCP G, act., (18) (2001)
- Planiol, "Traité pratique de droit civil français, t.2, La famille, par Rouast 2e" (1952), L.G.D.J.
- M.Nicolas, "au nom de la commission des lois, no 378 du senat(2000-2001), Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 13 juin 2001", ~ (2001)
- M.Alain Vidalies, "au nom de la commission mixte paritaire, no 3382 de l'Assmblée nationale no67 du Senat(2000-2001), Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 13 novembre 2001", ~ (2001)
- Sutton, "Du droit des grands-parents aux relations avec leurs petits-enfants" (1972), J.C.P
- T. Garé, "Les grands-parents dans le droit de la famille" (1989)
- Edwards, "Creating stability for children in step-families: time and substance in parenting", Children & Society, 16 (2002)