부모 아닌 자의 양육권
Non-Parents’ Rights to Child Custody
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Non-parents’ right to child custody is one of the many problems accompanying the current changed family view or family model. Korean Civil Law already has a history of trying to adapt to the new concept of family by breaking away from the traditional concept of family through legislation allowing (limited) grandparents’ right to visitation. This can be said to be part of the re-establishment of parental rights in terms of children’s welfare. The issue of custody of non-parents covered in this paper could also take the first step in its discussion in the same context. Such an examination inevitably involves adjusting the concept of parental rights, and it also involves a review of the relationship between parental rights and guardianship of minors as a supplement to parental authority. The custody of non-parents must first find its basis in guardianship of minors. However, it is worth noting that the supplementary nature of guardianship of minors to parental authority simultaneously implies an exclusive relationship between them. This is a limitation derived from the fact that guardianship of minors was originally designed as a supplement to parental authority, and in certain situations, it could come into an obstacle to realizing the maximization of children’s welfare. To solve this problem, there may be no need to re-establish the supplementary relationship between parental rights and guardianship of minors, but we need to consider an alternative of guardianship of minor. This article reviews the U.S. de facto parents system as the alternative. The de facto parent system, like the minor guardianship system, supplements the parental authority function, but its main focus is to contribute to the children’s welfare by maintaining and continuing the meaningful relationship already formed between the child and a non-parent. This does not simply assume an exclusive conflict with parental authority. This can be confirmed in the fact that joint custody or secondary custody is granted to the de facto parents in certain cases, which ultimately intended for the coexistence and cooperation of parents and de facto parents in raising children. This will be beneficial in achieving maximization of children’s welfare.
Abstract
Non-parents’ right to child custody is one of the many problems accompanying the current changed family view or family model. Korean Civil Law already has a history of trying to adapt to the new concept of family by breaking away from the traditional concept of family through legislation allowing (limited) grandparents’ right to visitation. This can be said to be part of the re-establishment of parental rights in terms of children’s welfare. The issue of custody of non-parents covered in this paper could also take the first step in its discussion in the same context. Such an examination inevitably involves adjusting the concept of parental rights, and it also involves a review of the relationship between parental rights and guardianship of minors as a supplement to parental authority. The custody of non-parents must first find its basis in guardianship of minors. However, it is worth noting that the supplementary nature of guardianship of minors to parental authority simultaneously implies an exclusive relationship between them. This is a limitation derived from the fact that guardianship of minors was originally designed as a supplement to parental authority, and in certain situations, it could come into an obstacle to realizing the maximization of children’s welfare. To solve this problem, there may be no need to re-establish the supplementary relationship between parental rights and guardianship of minors, but we need to consider an alternative of guardianship of minor. This article reviews the U.S. de facto parents system as the alternative. The de facto parent system, like the minor guardianship system, supplements the parental authority function, but its main focus is to contribute to the children’s welfare by maintaining and continuing the meaningful relationship already formed between the child and a non-parent. This does not simply assume an exclusive conflict with parental authority. This can be confirmed in the fact that joint custody or secondary custody is granted to the de facto parents in certain cases, which ultimately intended for the coexistence and cooperation of parents and de facto parents in raising children. This will be beneficial in achieving maximization of children’s welfare.
참고문헌 (45)
- 김상용, "가족법연구(Ⅱ)" (2006), 법문사
- 김주수, "친족상속법" (2018), 법문사
- 민유숙, "주석민법 친족1" (2020), 한국사법행정학회
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 박영사
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2023), 세창출판사
- 오시영, "친족상속법" (2011), 학현사
- 윤진수, "주해친족법 제1권" (2015), 박영사
- 윤진수, "주해친족법 제2권" (2015), 박영사
- 조은희, "친족상속법" (2023), 정독
- 사법연수원, "법원실무제요 가사(Ⅱ)" (2021)
- 곽민희, "프랑스법상 親權의 歸屬과 行使—親權移任制度(la délégation de l’autorité parentale)를 中心으로", 가족법연구, 26(3) (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 권재문, "친족위탁에 대한 재평가와 친족의탁양육자 지원을 위한 후견제도의 활용", 가족법연구, 28(3) (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 김민지, "가정위탁제도에 관한 법적 고찰―위탁부모의 법적지위를 중심으로", 가족법연구, 24(2) (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 김상용, "친권·후견법 개정안에 대한 몇가지 의견", 법조, 통권 : 504 (1998), 법조협회
- 김상용, "가정위탁양육에 관한 민법상의 쟁점", 법조, 통권 : 610 (2007)
- 김상용, "부모가 장기간 소재불명인 경우 미성년자녀에 대한 후견개시 여부에 대한 고찰", 중앙법학, 18(4) (2016), 중앙법학회
- 김수정, "자녀의 최선의 이익과 면접교섭권", 가족법연구, 19(1) (2005), 한국가족법학회
- 김은아, "재혼가족의 친족법적 과제", 가족법연구, 24(3) (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 김현수, "미국에서의 미성년후견인의 권한과 책임", 가족법연구, 26(2) (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 양혜원, "자녀보호의 관점에서 본 양육권 문제", 가족법연구, 25(3) (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 엄경천, "친권의 본질에 관한 검토", 가족법연구, 30(1) (2016), 한국가족법학회
- 윤부찬, "조부모의 면접교섭권에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (38) (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 윤우일, "가정위탁에서 후견제도 활용의 한계", 서울법학, 28(1) (2020), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 이근영, "미성년후견제도의 문제점과 정립방향", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 24(1) (2020)
- 이수진, "우리 민법에서 이혼과 공동양육 논의의 재고", 가족법연구, 37(1) (2023), 한국가족법학회
- 이은정, "친권 제한의 유연화", 가족법연구, 27(1) (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 이은정, "비친권자의 양육권", 가족법연구, 21(1) (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 이은정, "미국법상 양육자 결정에 대한 소고―부모 아닌 자의 양육 참여를 중심으로", 안암법학, 28 (2009), 안암법학회
- 이은정, "가정위탁(Foster Care) 제도에 대한 소고", 가족법연구, 16(1) (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 이현재, "의붓부모의 방문권과 당사자 적격―미국을 중심으로", 민사법연구, 12(1) (2004), 대한민사법학회
- 정현수, "요보호아동의 복리 관점에서 본 가정위탁제도 일고", 법학논총, 33(1) (2009), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 진도왕, "미국의 사실상 부모(De Facto Parent)법리에 관한 고찰", 법학논고, 71 (2020), 경북대학교 법학연구원
- 현소혜, "위탁아동을 위한 미성년후견 제도 개선 방안", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 509 (2022), 대한변호사협회
- 현소혜, "조부모와 계부모 기타 친족의 면접교섭권: 해석론과 입법론", 가족법연구, 29(2) (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 홍윤선, "독일법상 가정위탁보호제도", 법학논총, 44(3) (2020), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- American Law Institute, "Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution―Analysis and Recommendations", ~ (2002)
- Uniform Law Commission, "Uniform Nonparent Custody and Visitation Act", ~ (2018)
- Uniform Law Commission, "Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangement Act", ~ (2017)
- Alan B. Morrison, "Fundamentals of American Law" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Kristine L. Roberts, "State Supreme Court Applications of Troxel v. Granville and the Courts' Reluctance to Declare Grandparent Visitation Statutes Unconstitutional", Fam. Ct. Rev, 41, pp.14~ (2003)
- American Bar Association, "CHARTS 2021: FAMILY LAW IN THE FIFTY STATES, D.C., AND PUERTO RICO", Fam. L. Q, 55, pp.513~ (2022)
- Sara Alpert, "The Past and Future State of De Facto Parents in New York", Family Court Review, 55, pp.458~ (2017)
- Rebecca E. Hatch, "Esq., Litigation for De Facto Parent to Seek Child Custody or Visitation", Am. Jur. Trials, 143, pp.441~ (2020)
- "Developments in the Law: Ⅳ, Changing Realities of Parenthood: The Law’s Response to the Evolving American Family and Emerging Reproductive Technologies", Harv. L. Rev, 116, pp.2052~ (2003)
- Deirdre M. Smith, "From Orphans to Families in Crisis: Parental Rights Matters in Maine Probate Courts", Me. L. Rev, 68, pp.45~ (2016)