본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

번역문체 비교 연구: 소설 「유형의 땅」과 인바운드 vs 아웃바운드 번역을 중심으로

Exploring two translation styles: Inbound vs outbound translation of Yuhyŏng ŭi ttang (Land of Exile)

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This study aims to explore stylistic differences between inbound and outbound translation. For this purpose, Cho Chŏngnae’s Yuhyŏng ŭi ttang (1981) and two English translations thereof are analyzed in multiple levels of language, including word, fixed expression, punctuation, contracted form, and sentence length. The two translations analyzed in this study are (1) Land of Exile, a 1995 translation by Marshall R. Pihl, the late American translator and scholar in the field of Korean literature, and (2) The Land of the Banished, a 2001 translation by Chun Kyung-Ja, an award-winning Korean translator and former professor of English literature. The analysis shows that, in general, Chun’s translation is more source-oriented and less colloquial. More specifically, (a) Pihl uses more high-frequency nouns and adjectives, (b) Chun is more sensitive to fixed expressions and idioms, (c) Pihl uses more italics and contracted forms, while Chun retains punctuations of the source text, and (d) Chun often uses lengthier sentences in narration.

Abstract

This study aims to explore stylistic differences between inbound and outbound translation. For this purpose, Cho Chŏngnae’s Yuhyŏng ŭi ttang (1981) and two English translations thereof are analyzed in multiple levels of language, including word, fixed expression, punctuation, contracted form, and sentence length. The two translations analyzed in this study are (1) Land of Exile, a 1995 translation by Marshall R. Pihl, the late American translator and scholar in the field of Korean literature, and (2) The Land of the Banished, a 2001 translation by Chun Kyung-Ja, an award-winning Korean translator and former professor of English literature. The analysis shows that, in general, Chun’s translation is more source-oriented and less colloquial. More specifically, (a) Pihl uses more high-frequency nouns and adjectives, (b) Chun is more sensitive to fixed expressions and idioms, (c) Pihl uses more italics and contracted forms, while Chun retains punctuations of the source text, and (d) Chun often uses lengthier sentences in narration.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김순영, "문학번역에서 L1 번역과 L2 번역이 번역텍스트에 미치는 영향 —이효석의 『메밀꽃 필 무렵』 영역본을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 10(4), pp.41~59 (2009), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  2. 김순영, "김동인의 『감자(Potatoes)』 영역본 분석: 문체 번역을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 12(1), pp.79~95 (2010), 한국통역번역학회
  3. 마승혜, "문학번역가의 모국어와 번역성향의 상관관계 연구: 평가어 번역을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2014
  4. 박옥수, "한영 문학번역에서 L1 번역가가 고유성을 옮기는 방식: 「나는 봉천동에 산다」의 영역에 근거해서", 비교문학, (67), pp.57~86 (2015), 한국비교문학회
  5. 이선영, "문체표지(style markers)로서의 말줄임표와 의성어·의태어 번역 — 「풍금이 있던 자리」를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 16(2), pp.7~31 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  6. 이창수, "한영문학번역에서의 번역문체 연구- 문법은유를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 14(2), pp.173~195 (2012), 한국통역번역학회
  7. 이창수, "n-gram 분석을 활용한 황순원 작 ‘나무들 비탈에 서다’의 두 번역문 간 문체 차이 연구", 통번역학연구, 19(2), pp.1~19 (2015), 통번역연구소[DOI]
  8. 조의연, "이탤릭체의 문체적 활용: 『소년이 온다』 한영번역 연구", 번역학연구, 18(5), pp.231~252 (2017), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  9. 최희경, "한영 문학 번역 문체 연구: 코퍼스 기반 분석을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 17(3), pp.193~216 (2016), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  10. 한미애, "황순원 소설의 문체번역 가능성 —「소나기」를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 11(1), pp.293~310 (2010), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  11. Baker, M., "In Other Words" (2018), Routledge
  12. Leech. G., "Style in Fiction" (2007), Pearson
  13. Puurtinen, T., "Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Lisbon 2004", pp.213~222 (2007), John Benjamins
  14. Pihl, M. R., "Land of Exile: Contemporary Korean Fiction", pp.1993, M.E. Sharpe
  15. Chun, K-J., "The Land of the Banished" (2001), Jimoondang

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)