Porcine-derived soft block bone substitutes for the treatment of severe class II furcation-involved mandibular molars: a prospective controlled follow-up study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: No evidence exists regarding the advantages of periodontal regeneration treatment for furcation defects using soft block bone substitutes. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of regenerative therapy using porcine-derived soft block bone substitutes (DPBM-C, test group) compared with porcinederived particulate bone substitutes (DPBM, control group) for the treatment of severe class II furcation defects in the mandibular molar regions. Methods: Thirty-five enrolled patients (test group, n=17; control group, n=18) were available for a 12-month follow-up assessment. Clinical (probing pocket depth [PPD] and clinical attachment level [CAL]) and radiographic (vertical furcation defect; VFD) parameters were evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months after regenerative treatment. Early postoperative discomfort (severity and duration of pain and swelling) and wound healing outcomes (dehiscence, suppuration, abscess formation, and swelling) were also assessed 2 weeks after surgery. Results: For both treatment modalities, significant improvements in PPD, CAL, and VFD were found in the test group (PPD reduction of 4.1±3.0 mm, CAL gain of 4.4±2.9 mm, and VFD reduction of 4.1±2.5 mm) and control group (PPD reduction of 2.7±2.0 mm, CAL gain of 2.0±2.8 mm, and VFD reduction of 2.4±2.5 mm) 12 months after the regenerative treatment of furcation defects (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the measured clinical and radiographic parameters, and no significant differences were observed in any early postoperative discomfort and wound healing outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Similar to DPBM, DPBM-C showed favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes for periodontal regeneration of severe class II furcation defects in a 12-month follow-up period. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007305
Abstract
Purpose: No evidence exists regarding the advantages of periodontal regeneration treatment for furcation defects using soft block bone substitutes. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of regenerative therapy using porcine-derived soft block bone substitutes (DPBM-C, test group) compared with porcinederived particulate bone substitutes (DPBM, control group) for the treatment of severe class II furcation defects in the mandibular molar regions. Methods: Thirty-five enrolled patients (test group, n=17; control group, n=18) were available for a 12-month follow-up assessment. Clinical (probing pocket depth [PPD] and clinical attachment level [CAL]) and radiographic (vertical furcation defect; VFD) parameters were evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months after regenerative treatment. Early postoperative discomfort (severity and duration of pain and swelling) and wound healing outcomes (dehiscence, suppuration, abscess formation, and swelling) were also assessed 2 weeks after surgery. Results: For both treatment modalities, significant improvements in PPD, CAL, and VFD were found in the test group (PPD reduction of 4.1±3.0 mm, CAL gain of 4.4±2.9 mm, and VFD reduction of 4.1±2.5 mm) and control group (PPD reduction of 2.7±2.0 mm, CAL gain of 2.0±2.8 mm, and VFD reduction of 2.4±2.5 mm) 12 months after the regenerative treatment of furcation defects (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the measured clinical and radiographic parameters, and no significant differences were observed in any early postoperative discomfort and wound healing outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Similar to DPBM, DPBM-C showed favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes for periodontal regeneration of severe class II furcation defects in a 12-month follow-up period. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007305
참고문헌 (33)
- Al-Shammari KF, "Molar root anatomy and management of furcation defects", J Clin Periodontol, 28, pp.730~740 (2001)
- Pontoriero R, "Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of furcation defects in man", J Clin Periodontol, 14, pp.618~620 (1987)
- Reynolds MA, "Periodontal regeneration-intrabony defects : a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop", J Periodontol, 86, pp.S105~S107 (2015)
- Machtei EE, "The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans : a meta-analysis", J Periodontol, 72, pp.512~516 (2001)
- Ling LJ, "The influence of membrane exposure on the outcomes of guided tissue regeneration : clinical and microbiological aspects", J Periodontal Res, 38, pp.57~63 (2003)
- Swami RK, "Bone replacement grafts with guided tissue regeneration in treatment of grade II furcation defects : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Investig, 25, pp.807~821 (2021)
- Richardson CR, "Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss : a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans", J Clin Periodontol, 26, pp.421~428 (1999)
- Baldini N, "Deproteinized bovine bone in periodontal and implant surgery", Dent Mater, 27, pp.61~70 (2011)
- Park JW, "Increased new bone formation with a surface magnesium-incorporated deproteinized porcine bone substitute in rabbit calvarial defects", J Biomed Mater Res A, 100, pp.834~840 (2012)
- 이정헌, "Physicochemical characterization of porcine bone-derived grafting material and comparison with bovine xenografts for dental applications", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 47(6), pp.388~401 (2017), 대한치주과학회
- Lee JH, "Adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivatives to porcine-derived xenograft for the treatment of one-wall intrabony defects : two-year longitudinal results of a randomized controlled clinical trial", J Periodontol, 91, pp.880~889 (2020)
- 김연태, "Effectiveness of porcine-derived xenograft with enamel matrix derivative for periodontal regenerative treatment of intrabony defects associated with a fixed dental prosthesis: a 2-year follow-up retrospective study", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 51(3), pp.179~188 (2021), 대한치주과학회[DOI]
- Lee JH, "Long-term stability of adjunctive use of enamel matrix protein derivative on porcine-derived xenograft for the treatment of one-wall intrabony defects : a 4-year extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial", J Periodontol, 93, pp.229~236 (2022)
- Tomasi C, "Factors influencing the outcome of non-surgical periodontal treatment : a multilevel approach", J Clin Periodontol, 34, pp.682~690 (2007)
- Morris K, "Revising the Declaration of Helsinki", Lancet, 381, pp.1889~1890 (2013)
- Hamp SE, "Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years", J Clin Periodontol, 2, pp.126~135 (1975)
- Tarnow D, "Classification of the vertical component of furcation involvement", J Periodontol, 55, pp.283~284 (1984)
- Lee JH, "Assessment of early discomfort and wound healing outcomes after periodontal surgery with and without enamel matrix derivative : an observational retrospective case-control study", Clin Oral Investig, 24, pp.229~237 (2020)
- Rojas MA, "Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative periodontal surgery with enamel matrix derivatives or guided tissue regeneration : a systematic review", BMC Oral Health, 19, pp.76~ (2019)
- Peres MF, "Hydroxyapatite", β-tricalcium phosphate and enamel matrix derivative for treatment of proximal class II furcation defects : a randomized clinical trial, 2013, pp.40, 252~259
- Sculean A, "Biomaterials for promoting periodontal regeneration in human intrabony defects : a systematic review", Periodontol 2000, 68, pp.182~216 (2015)
- Cattabriga M, "The conservative approach in the treatment of furcation lesions", Periodontol 2000, 22, pp.133~153 (2000)
- Needleman I, "Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal intrabony defects--a Cochrane Systematic Review", Periodontol 2000, 37, pp.106~123 (2005)
- Jepsen S, "A systematic review of guided tissue regeneration for periodontal furcation defects. What is the effect of guided tissue regeneration compared with surgical debridement in the treatment of furcation defects?", J Clin Periodontol, 29(Suppl 3), pp.103~116 (2002)
- Avila-Ortiz G, "Periodontal regeneration-furcation defects : a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop", J Periodontol, 86, pp.S108~S130 (2015)
- Reynolds MA, "The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review", Ann Periodontol, 8, pp.227~265 (2003)
- Chitsazi MT, "Efficacy of open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivatives in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation involvement", Clin Oral Investig, 11, pp.385~389 (2007)
- Donos N, "Wound healing of degree III furcation involvements following guided tissue regeneration and", or Emdogain. A histologic study, 2003, pp.30, 1061~1068
- Casarin RC, "Enamel matrix derivative proteins for the treatment of proximal class II furcation involvements : a prospective 24-month randomized clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 37, pp.1100~1109 (2010)
- Soares DM, "The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of class II furcation defects : systematic review and meta-analysis", Aust Dent J, 65, pp.241~251 (2020)
- Miron RJ, "Enamel matrix derivative in combination with bone grafts : a review of the literature", Quintessence Int, 45, pp.475~487 (2014)
- Fernandes JM, "Enamel matrix proteins associated with GTR and bioactive glass in the treatment of class III furcation in dogs", Braz Oral Res, 19, pp.169~175 (2005)
- Jaiswal R, "Evaluation of the effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative, bone grafts, and membrane in the treatment of mandibular class II furcation defects", Int J Periodont Restor Dent, 33, pp.e58~64 (2013)