키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 국내외 통번역 연구동향 비교
Comparison of research trends in translation and interpreting through keyword network analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study carries out a bibliometric analysis to uncover the gap between global and local research trends in translation and interpreting. The research analyzes papers on translation and interpreting published between 2015 and 2019 in the Web of Science (WoS) and Korea Citation Index (KCI). First, the paper identified publication activities, geographic distributions, and research areas in WoS and KCI. Second, the paper conducted keyword network analysis and visualization. The result shows that the number of links and total link strengths of KCI recorded only 1/10 and 1/8 of WoS, respectively, indicating weak linkage between keywords in KCI papers. In particular, comparison of top 20 keywords between WoS and KCI reveals that research themes in KCI are less diverse than those in WoS, mostly focusing on translation strategies. Unlike previous bibliometric research in Korean translation studies that analyzed only translation studies journals, this paper analyzed all journals indexed by WoS and KCI and employed keyword network analysis and visualization for more comprehensive and objective description of research trends in and outside of Korea.
Abstract
This study carries out a bibliometric analysis to uncover the gap between global and local research trends in translation and interpreting. The research analyzes papers on translation and interpreting published between 2015 and 2019 in the Web of Science (WoS) and Korea Citation Index (KCI). First, the paper identified publication activities, geographic distributions, and research areas in WoS and KCI. Second, the paper conducted keyword network analysis and visualization. The result shows that the number of links and total link strengths of KCI recorded only 1/10 and 1/8 of WoS, respectively, indicating weak linkage between keywords in KCI papers. In particular, comparison of top 20 keywords between WoS and KCI reveals that research themes in KCI are less diverse than those in WoS, mostly focusing on translation strategies. Unlike previous bibliometric research in Korean translation studies that analyzed only translation studies journals, this paper analyzed all journals indexed by WoS and KCI and employed keyword network analysis and visualization for more comprehensive and objective description of research trends in and outside of Korea.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김혜림, "한국의 당대(1999-2013) 번역학 연구동향", 번역학연구, 14(5), pp.95~115 (2013), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이건일, "한국 심층학습을 이용한 기계번역 연구 동향", 정보과 학회지, 33(10), pp.40~47 (2015)
- 이창수, "국내 번역연구의 어제와 오늘: 텍스트 마이닝 분석 —『번역학연구』를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 19(2), pp.234~252 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이창수, "2010년대 국내 통번역학 연구 동향에 대한 키워드 분석", 번역학연구, 20(5), pp.107~129 (2019), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 정호정, "번역학 전문학술지의 발달과 최근 연구 동향 -1999년 이후 국내외 대표 학술지 분석-", 통역과 번역, 15(1), pp.235~256 (2013), 한국통역번역학회
- 조성은, "영상번역 연구의 동향과 전망", 번역학연구, 15(2), pp.205~224 (2014), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 최희경, "코퍼스를 활용한 번역 연구 - 국내외 연구 동향과 과제 -", 번역학연구, 16(2), pp.317~338 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 한현희, "한국 통역학 연구의 동향과 과제: 해외 연구 동향과의 비교를 기반으로", 번역학연구, 17(2), pp.251~286 (2016), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 한현희, "한국의 통번역 교육 연구 동향에 관한 메타분석 연구", 번역학연구, 18(1), pp.171~202 (2017), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- Boyack, K. W., "Mapping the backbone of science", Scientometrics, 64(3), pp.351~374 (2005)
- De Bellis, N., "Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics" (2009), Scarecrow
- Dong, D., "Publication trends and co-citation mapping of translation studies between 2000 and 2015", Scientometrics, 105(2), pp.1111~1128 (2015)
- Fahimnia, B., "Green supply chain management : A review and bibliometric analysis", International Journal of Production Economics, 162, pp.101~114 (2015)
- Gauthier, É., "Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific and Technological Research : A User's Guide to the Methodology", Statistics Canada, ~ (1998)
- Grbić, N., "Counting what counts. Research on community interpreting in German-speaking countries – A scientometric study", Target, 20(2), pp.297~332 (2008)
- Grbić, N., "To count or not to count:Scientometrics as a methodological tool for investigating research on Translation and Interpreting", Translation and Interpreting Studies, 3(1–2), pp.87~146 (2008)
- Grbić, N., "Efforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research: A Tribute to Daniel Gile. (Vol. 3–24)", pp.3~ (2009), John Benjamins
- Li, X., "International visibility of mainland China Translation Studies community : A scientometric study", Perspectives, 23(2), pp.183~204 (2015)
- Martínez-Gómez, A., "Bibliometrics as a tool to map uncharted territory : A study on non-professional interpreting", Perspectives, 23(2), pp.205~222 (2015)
- Van Doorslaer, L., "Measuring relationships in translation studies. On affiliations and keyword frequencies in the translation studies bibliography", Perspectives, 23(2), pp.305~319 (2015)
- Zanettin, F., "Sketching landscapes in translation studies : A bibliographic study", Perspectives, 23(2), pp.161~182 (2015)
- Zhang, M., "Mapping discourse analysis in translation studies via bibliometrics : A survey of journal publications", Perspectives, 23(2), pp.223~239 (2015)
- "VOSviewer: A computer program for bibliometric mapping (No. ERS-2009-005-LIS)" (2009)[URL]