본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

감수자 자격과 감수품질에 관한 제언: 한영번역에 대한 원어민 감수를 중심으로

How does revisers’ profile influence revision quality?

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

The previous studies explain that revision should be performed bilingually by a person who has the same qualifications with the translator: revisers should be bilingual and have translation experience. However, it is hard to find a reviser who satisfies the requirements for translations from Korean into foreign languages. Therefore, monolingual revision by a native speaker, who cannot read the Korean source text, has become an established process in translation production in Korea. Therefore, this study analyzed how revisers’ profile influenced revision quality. It found native speakers who have both Korean reading capability and translation experience generally recorded high quality scores for their revisions. However, quality scores varied among native speakers without translation experience, regardless of their SL capability. Given the difficulty in finding qualified bilingual revisers for translations from Korean into foreign languages, LSPs need to implement measures designed to improve the quality of monolingual revision, such as regular verification of revision quality, and training and instructions for revisers on effective strategies.

Abstract

The previous studies explain that revision should be performed bilingually by a person who has the same qualifications with the translator: revisers should be bilingual and have translation experience. However, it is hard to find a reviser who satisfies the requirements for translations from Korean into foreign languages. Therefore, monolingual revision by a native speaker, who cannot read the Korean source text, has become an established process in translation production in Korea. Therefore, this study analyzed how revisers’ profile influenced revision quality. It found native speakers who have both Korean reading capability and translation experience generally recorded high quality scores for their revisions. However, quality scores varied among native speakers without translation experience, regardless of their SL capability. Given the difficulty in finding qualified bilingual revisers for translations from Korean into foreign languages, LSPs need to implement measures designed to improve the quality of monolingual revision, such as regular verification of revision quality, and training and instructions for revisers on effective strategies.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 강경이, "번역수업에서 번역과제물 감수활동을 통한 다면평가 제안", 번역학연구, 12(4), pp.7~32 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  2. 김혜영, "번역교육에서의 동료 평가 및 동료 감수의 효과", 통역과 번역, 11(2), pp.39~63 (2009), 한국통역번역학회
  3. 모섭, B., "번역가를 위한 편집과 교정" (2011), 동인
  4. 박지영, "한국형 번역표준 도입을 위한 번역명세서 모형에 관한 연구 : 정부기관의 번역명세서를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2015
  5. 부조, "(고급)한영번역의 기술" (2013), 이화여자대학교출판부
  6. 이향, "번역물 감수기준의 변천 고찰", 통역과 번역, 6(2), pp.59~80 (2004), 한국통역번역학회
  7. Bell, R. T., "Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice" (1991), Longman
  8. Bisailon, J., "Professional editing strategies used by six editors", Written Communication, 24(4), pp.295~322 (2007)
  9. Brunette, L., "Towards a terminology for translation quality assessment : A comparison of TQA practices", The Translator, 6(2), pp.169~182 (2000)
  10. Brunette, L., "Should revision trainees think aloud while revising somebody else’s translation? Insights from an empirical study with professionals", Meta, 61(2), pp.320~345 (2016)
  11. Chakhachiro, R., "Revision for quality", Perspectives, 13(3), pp.255~238 (2005)
  12. Gile, D., "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training" (1995), Benjamins
  13. Graham, J. D., "The Translator’s Handbook", pp.99~105 (1983), Aslib
  14. Hernández-Morin, K., "La révision comme clé de la gestion de la qualité des traductions en contexte professionnel", doctor, pp.2009
  15. Horguelin, A., "Pratique de la Révision" (1998), Linguatech
  16. Hurtado, A. A., "Traducción y Traductología. Introducción a la Traductología" (2001), Cátedra
  17. Jamoussi, R., "Exporting cultural goods through the medium of translation in the Arab world : the(Not so)strange case of L2translation", The Translator, 21(2), pp.173~188 (2015)
  18. Ko, L., "Translation checking : a view from the translation market", Perspectives, 19(2), pp.123~134 (2011)
  19. Krings, H., "Repairing Texts" (2001), Kent State University Press
  20. Künzli, A., "Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning", pp.9~24 (2006), Helsinki University
  21. Künzli, A., "Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies", pp.115~126 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing
  22. Marin-Lacarta, M., "Translators revising translators : a fruitful alliance", Perspectives, 27(3), pp.404~418 (2019)
  23. Mitchell, L., "Community Post-editing of Machine-translated User-generated Content", doctor, pp.2015
  24. 남원준, "Corpora & Revision in Translator Education: An Action Research-based Case Study on the Application of Corpora to the Korean-into-English Translation Classroom with Revision as a Complementary Resource", 번역학연구, 16(4), pp.79~81 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  25. Newmark, P., "About Translation" (1983), Multilingual Matters
  26. Robert, I., "Translation revision procedures: An explorative study", Translation and Its Others. Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2007 (2008)
  27. Robert, I. S., "Selecting a translation revision procedure : do common sense and statistics agree", Perspectives, 22(3), pp.304~320 (2014)
  28. Sager, J. C., "Language Engineering and Translation. Consequences of Automation" (1994), John Benjamins
  29. Schjoldager, A., "Précis-writing, revision and editing : Piloting the European master in translation", Meta, 53(4), pp.798~813 (2008)
  30. Schwartz, L., "Monolingual Post-editing by a Domain Expert is Highly Effective for Translation Triage", Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice (2014)
  31. van Rensburg, A., "Developing assessment instruments: The effect of a reviser’s profile on the quality of the revision product", Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 16, pp.71~88 (2017)
  32. Weaver, W., "The Craft of Translation" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  33. Williams, M., "The assessment of professional translation quality:Creating credibility out of chaos", TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction, 2(2), pp.13~33 (1989)
  34. "Flowchart for error point decisions" (2009)[URL]
  35. International Organization for Standardization, "ISO 17100:2015", ~ (2015)
  36. "Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) definition" (2015)[URL]
  37. "Translation services — Requirements for translation services"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)