법정통역인에 대한 평가 양상 고찰: 통역모드와 점수에 따른 차이를 중심으로
An examination of the evaluation patterns of court interpreters: Focus on mode-specific and score variations
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, the results of the certification examination for court interpreters were analyzed to investigate how different evaluation criteria impact overall scores based on the examinees' score ranges. The findings revealed that, regardless of the interpreting mode, examinees who scored below 70 points (failing) were most significantly affected by the fluency of the target language. In dialogue interpreting, low target language fluency resulted in poor outcomes, independent of other factors. Once target language fluency was achieved, faithfulness to the original message became the primary factor influencing the results. In consecutive interpreting, note-taking proficiency was found to have a substantial impact on performance. Unlike dialogue interpreting, where note-taking was not required, candidates who were less familiar with the note-taking process tended to struggle, even with target language fluency. This suggests that note-taking proficiency played a critical role in consecutive interpreting. For sight translation, the ability to naturally convey specialized terms and expressions determined pass or fail outcomes. Although sight translation does not rely heavily on memory, faithfulness to the content still played a significant role in the success of candidates scoring above 70 points, indicating frequent omissions or mistranslations among lower-scoring candidates.
Abstract
In this paper, the results of the certification examination for court interpreters were analyzed to investigate how different evaluation criteria impact overall scores based on the examinees' score ranges. The findings revealed that, regardless of the interpreting mode, examinees who scored below 70 points (failing) were most significantly affected by the fluency of the target language. In dialogue interpreting, low target language fluency resulted in poor outcomes, independent of other factors. Once target language fluency was achieved, faithfulness to the original message became the primary factor influencing the results. In consecutive interpreting, note-taking proficiency was found to have a substantial impact on performance. Unlike dialogue interpreting, where note-taking was not required, candidates who were less familiar with the note-taking process tended to struggle, even with target language fluency. This suggests that note-taking proficiency played a critical role in consecutive interpreting. For sight translation, the ability to naturally convey specialized terms and expressions determined pass or fail outcomes. Although sight translation does not rely heavily on memory, faithfulness to the content still played a significant role in the success of candidates scoring above 70 points, indicating frequent omissions or mistranslations among lower-scoring candidates.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김혜림, "국내 통번역대학원 졸업고사 채점 기준에 관한 연구", 통번역학연구, 12(2), pp.89~114 (2011)
- 이지은, "사법 통역의 이론과 실제: 경찰 통역에서 난민 통역까지" (2017), 한국출판사
- 정철자, "통역사의 평가 기준에 대한 연구", 통번역교육연구, 13(1), pp.75~98 (2012)
- Angelelli, C. V., "Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Bühler, H., "Linguistic(semantic)and extralinguistic(pragmatic)criteria for the evaluation of conference interpretation and interpreters", Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 5(4), pp.231~235 (1986)
- Chiaro, D., "Interpreters’ perception of linguistic and non-linguistic factors affecting quality : A survey through the world wide web", Interpreting, 6(2), pp.231~246 (2004)
- Collados, A., "Quality assessment in simultaneous interpreting : The importance of nonverbal communication", Interpreting, 3(1), pp.35~50 (1998)
- Gonzalez, R., "Fundamentals of court interpretation: Theory, policy, and practice" (2012), Carolina Academic Press
- Hale, S., "The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the Interpreter" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing
- Hale, S., "Community interpreting" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Jones, R., "Conference interpreting explained" (2014), Routledge
- Kurz, I., "Conference interpretation : Expectations of different user groups", The Interpreters' Newsletter, 5, pp.13~21 (1993)
- Lee, J., "Interpreting in legal contexts" (2015), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Mikkelson, H., "Introduction to Court Interpreting" (2000), St. Jerome Publishing
- Moser, B., "Expectations of users of conference interpretation", Interpreting, 1(2), pp.145~178 (1995)
- Pöchhacker, F., "Introducing interpreting studies" (2016), Routledge
- Russell, D., "Consecutive interpreting : Its importance and uses", Journal of Interpretation Studies, 15(2), pp.55~68 (2000)
- Zwischenberger, C., "Quality criteria in interpreting : A survey among AIIC and VKD members", Interpreting, 12(1), pp.117~142 (2010)