본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Applying error analysis to note-taking instruction: Implications for the undergraduate classroom

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This study aimed to examine the relationship between conference interpretation (CI) and note-taking through an analysis of notes produced by undergraduate students during CI classes. A comparison of the original speech, notes, and the interpretation was made to identify factors which impede accurate interpretation. This study specifically focused on the error types manifested by the students in order to identify teaching points at the undergraduate level of CI instruction. The results showed a pattern where students’ errors appeared to be concentrated in contre-sens or TL mistakes. Among the errors associated with note-taking practices, an analysis was performed on words that were either undeciphered or misdeciphered. Examples include omitting keywords written down during interpretation, misinterpretation of metaphors, grammar mistakes and/or awkward use of language due to source language interference, and misinterpretation due to ineffective arrangement of notes and loss of concentration. The relationship between errors commonly made by undergraduate students during CI and their note-taking practices was examined, and diagnoses were presented to help students improve their note-taking skills and interpretation. Also, educational implications and teaching points were proposed.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between conference interpretation (CI) and note-taking through an analysis of notes produced by undergraduate students during CI classes. A comparison of the original speech, notes, and the interpretation was made to identify factors which impede accurate interpretation. This study specifically focused on the error types manifested by the students in order to identify teaching points at the undergraduate level of CI instruction. The results showed a pattern where students’ errors appeared to be concentrated in contre-sens or TL mistakes. Among the errors associated with note-taking practices, an analysis was performed on words that were either undeciphered or misdeciphered. Examples include omitting keywords written down during interpretation, misinterpretation of metaphors, grammar mistakes and/or awkward use of language due to source language interference, and misinterpretation due to ineffective arrangement of notes and loss of concentration. The relationship between errors commonly made by undergraduate students during CI and their note-taking practices was examined, and diagnoses were presented to help students improve their note-taking skills and interpretation. Also, educational implications and teaching points were proposed.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Abbott, G., "Towards a more rigorous analysis of foreign language errors", IRAL, 28, pp.121~134 (1980)
  2. Abuin, G., "The language of consecutive interpreters’ notes differences across levels of expertise", Interpreting, 14(1), pp.55~72 (2012)
  3. Dam, H., "Knowledge Systems and Translation", pp.227~253 (2005), Walter de Gruyter
  4. Ficchi, V., "Learning consecutive interpretation", Interpreting, 4(2), pp.199~218 (1999)
  5. Gile, D., "Difficulties in transmitting information in simultaneous interpretation", Babel, 30, pp.18~25 (1984)
  6. Gile, D., "Fidelity assessment in consecutive interpretation : An experiment", Target, 7(1), pp.151~164 (1995)
  7. Gillies, A., "Note-Taking for Consecutive Interpreting - A Short Course" (2005), Routledge
  8. Henderson, J. A., "Note-taking for consecutive interpreting", Babe, 20, pp.107~116 (1976)
  9. 진실희, "체계적 노트테이킹 학습을 위한 사례연구 - 점진적 책임 이양 수업 설계를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 23(4), pp.231~261 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
  10. Jones, R., "Conference Interpreting Explained" (2002), St Jerome Publishing
  11. 김혜영, "Incorporating Flipped Learning into the Interpreting Classroom: Application and Implications", 통번역학연구, 23(2), pp.71~92 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
  12. Lee, C., "Pedagogic merits of teaching to take notes in the target language", Interpreting and Translation Studies, 5(0), pp.97~111 (2001)
  13. 이유아, "동시통역 학습자의 통역 오류에 관한 고찰 - 언어간섭현상을 중심으로 -", 일어일문학, (37), pp.99~117 (2008), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
  14. Lim, H., "A post-mortem of note-taking", Forum, 4(2), pp.89~111 (2006)
  15. Minyar-Beloruchev, R. K., "General Theory of Translation and Oral Translation" (1980), Voennizdat
  16. 남원준, "노트테이킹과 순차통역 품질간의 인과 관계", 통번역학연구, 11(2), pp.55~79 (2008), 통번역연구소
  17. Parks, G. B., "What language do interpreters speak?", Rassegna Italiana di Lingistica Applicata, 14, pp.121~135 (1982)
  18. Riccardi, A., "Teaching Translation and Interpreting 4: Building Bridges", pp.115~126 (2002), John Benjamins
  19. Schweda-Nicholson, N., "Consecutive interpretation training: Videotapes in the classroom", Meta, 30, pp.148~154 (1985)
  20. Seleskovitch, D., "Interpreting for International Conferences" (1978), Pen and Booth
  21. Seleskovitch, D, "Luxembourg: Didier Erudition" (1989), Pen and Booth

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)