군사통번역의 특성과 군통번역사의 자질
Characteristics of military interpretation and translation and qualifications of military interpreters and translators
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we examine the attributes and characteristics of military interpretation and translation, which can be considered as the foundation of their research and as a qualification required for military interpreters and translators. As a medium of military interpretation and translation, military foreign language is a foreign language with specific purposes. Military discourse, as a means of communication for a special group called Soldiers, is the object of military interpretation and translation, showing its characteristics as a distinct institutional discourse more than anything else. Military discourse, in the form of text, refrains from emotional expression as much as possible and is characterized by its concise and compressed form. In addition, it does not allow multiple interpretations, places importance on conveying clear meaning, and requires that not only the content but also the format of the original text be kept as identical to the original text format as possible. Lastly, special types of vocabulary, such as military-specific jargon, abbreviations, and clichés, are often used. Therefore, it is very important for military interpreters and translators to be familiar with special military vocabulary and find the appropriate equivalents. Military interpreters and translators are required to have work ethics and qualifications that are different from those generally required. Due to the nature of the military organization, interpretation and translation are considered as missions that must be performed, requiring additional qualifications to execute the mission. Therefore, on top of the lingual expertise such as interpretation and translation skills, one must be patriotic, sacrificial, and highly motivated to protect national interests and secrets. Additionally, military interpreters need to fully understand that they are members of a military organization that is represented by the chain of command.9.8% of the total job duties described in all postings.
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the attributes and characteristics of military interpretation and translation, which can be considered as the foundation of their research and as a qualification required for military interpreters and translators. As a medium of military interpretation and translation, military foreign language is a foreign language with specific purposes. Military discourse, as a means of communication for a special group called Soldiers, is the object of military interpretation and translation, showing its characteristics as a distinct institutional discourse more than anything else. Military discourse, in the form of text, refrains from emotional expression as much as possible and is characterized by its concise and compressed form. In addition, it does not allow multiple interpretations, places importance on conveying clear meaning, and requires that not only the content but also the format of the original text be kept as identical to the original text format as possible. Lastly, special types of vocabulary, such as military-specific jargon, abbreviations, and clichés, are often used. Therefore, it is very important for military interpreters and translators to be familiar with special military vocabulary and find the appropriate equivalents. Military interpreters and translators are required to have work ethics and qualifications that are different from those generally required. Due to the nature of the military organization, interpretation and translation are considered as missions that must be performed, requiring additional qualifications to execute the mission. Therefore, on top of the lingual expertise such as interpretation and translation skills, one must be patriotic, sacrificial, and highly motivated to protect national interests and secrets. Additionally, military interpreters need to fully understand that they are members of a military organization that is represented by the chain of command.9.8% of the total job duties described in all postings.
참고문헌 (42)
- 강지혜, "번역 수용자들은 ‘번역능력’을 어떻게 이해하는가? 인터넷 공론장에서의 번역 논쟁을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 17(4), pp.1~34 (2013)
- 고선정, "한국 전쟁기 군 통번역사의 역할과 정체성 연구", 박사, pp.2022
- 곽중철, "한국의 군사 통역 현황과 장래 교육 방향 연구", 통번역학연구, 19(1), pp.1~19 (2015)
- 남혜현, "현대 러시아어의 문체체계 변동 연구", 슬라브학보, 27(2), pp.1~26 (2012)
- 박소영, "미군정기 통역정치 : 이묘묵을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 23(2), pp.93~116 (2019)
- 박용한, "제도 상황과 제도 대화", 담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문 (2016)
- 송혜원, "미군 통역들의 문학사", 동방학지, 192, pp.25~48 (2020)
- 진제희, "기능단계별로 나타난 의료면담의 제도 대화적 특징연구", 사회언어학, 14(1), pp.137~163 (2006)
- 최효은, "한국 전쟁 정전협상 통역은 누가 했을까 : 초기 개신교 선교사 언더우드의 손자 형제를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 23(1), pp.169~199 (2019)
- Asher, R. E., "The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. (Vol.10)" (1994), Pergamon
- Drew, P., "Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings", pp.3~65 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Manuela, F. S, "Understanding the role of interpreting in the peacemaking process at the Korean armistice negotiations (Panmunjom 1953)", 통번역학연구, 13(2), pp.229~249 (2010)
- Kastner, K., "The interpreter and translator : A historical foray through three millennia", German Court Interpreter, 2, pp.13~21 (1997)
- PACTE, "Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research", pp.43~66 (2003), John Benjamins
- Банман, П. П, "Военный переводчик : требования и компетенции. Вестник Пермского Национального Исследовательского Политехнического Университета", Проблемы Языкознания И Педагогик, 2(12), pp.106~112 (2015)
- Бидеркесен, Д., "Военная лексика как особый элемент лексической системы языка", Казанский Лингвистический Журнал, 3(1), pp.5~16 (2020)
- Бондаренко, Л. Н, "Некоторые особенности перевода военного дискурса", Наука И Современность, 28, pp.214~218 (2014)
- Виноградов, В. В, "Основные Этапы Истории Русского Языка" (1978), Избранные труды
- Гарбовский, Н. К, "Военныйперевод в современном мире(теоретикометодологические, лингвистические, военно–исторические и социальнополитические аспекты. ВЕстник Московского Университета", Теория Перевода, 2, pp.16~41 (2010)
- Карасик, В. И, "Языковой Круг : личность" (2002), Перемена
- Карасик, В. И., "Культурогенные тексты : функции, жанры, авторы", Социальные И Гуманитарные Знания, 6(1), pp.82~91 (2020)
- Миньяр-Белоручев, Р. К, "О Принципах Обучения Иностранным Языкам. Общая Методика Обучения Иностранным Языкам" (1991), Просвещение
- Мужчинин, Р. Ю., "Особенности Перевода Военно–Технической Терминологии (На Примере Полевого Устава СВ США)", master, pp.2020
- Нелюбин, Л. Л, "Толковый Переводоведческий Словарь" (2003), Флинта Наука
- Новикова, Э. Ю., "Дискурсивная личность переводчика : переводческие компетенции и ролевой портрет. Вестник Волгоградского Государственного Университета", Языкознание, 16(3), pp.90~102 (2017)
- Осокина, Е. С., "Формирование Профессиональной Компетенции Военного Переводчика", Paper presented at the meeting of Сборник материалов круглого стола в рамках III-й Международной олимпиады курсантов по иностранному языку, Санкт-Петербург (2017)
- Панков, Ф. И., "Функционально-коммуникативная система семантических разрядов наречий (фрагмент лингводидактической модели русской грамматики)", Вестник Московского Университета. Серия 9. Филология, 4, pp.30~57 (2008)
- Полончук, Р. А, "Формирование профессиональной компетенции военных переводчиков китайского языка средствами фразеологии военной тематики", Военная Мысль, 10, pp.70~76 (2018)
- Пономарева, Е. В., "Англоязычный военный дискурс : его главнее черты и свойства", Аспирант, 7, pp.150~153 (2015)
- Русакова, О. Ф., "Основные теоретико-методологические подходы к интерпретации дискурса", Антиномии, 7, pp.5~34 (2007)
- Сдобнова, Ю. Н., "Некоторые дискурсивные особенности современной военной терминосистемы Вооруженных сил Франции", Вестник МГЛУ, 10, pp.195~209 (2014)
- Стадульская, Н. А, "С миром на его языке. Гуманитарные", Социально-Экономические И Общественные Науки, 7, pp.81~85 (2015)
- Старкин, А. А., "Военный Перевод И Его Виды", Материалы четвертой итоговой научно-практической конференции (2018)
- Сухоруков, Е. А., "Гибридизация в различных видах институционального дискурса. Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета", Гуманитарные Науки, 3(742), pp.30~36 (2016)
- Хомутова, Т. Н., "Язык для специальных целей(LSP) : лингвистический аспект. Известия Российского Государственного Педагогического Университета Им. А. И", Герцена, 71, pp.96~106 (2008)
- Хомутова, Т. Н, "Военно-политический дискурс как особый тип дискурса. Вестник Южно-Уральского Государственного Университета", Серия : Лингвистика, 14(3), pp.49~53 (2017)
- Хурматуллин, А. К., "Понятие дискурса в современной лингвистике", Казанского Государственного Университета. Гуманит. Наук, 6, pp.31~37 (2009)
- Чиркова, Е. И., "Символический характер коммуникации военнослужащих", Записки Горного Института, 167(1), pp.302~306 (2006)
- Шевченко, М. А, "Методика Обучения Военных Переводчиков Профессиональному Иноязычному Дискурсу На Основе Компетентностного Подхода" (2017), Наук
- "Проблема Перевода Военных Сокращений, Аббревиатур И Терминов"[URL]
- "두산세계백과사전"[URL]
- "2차 세계대전 日 핵폭탄 투하는 오역이 불렀다" (2013)[URL]