본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Interpreting Warrant Officer System and Defense Interpreting in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

In May, 2012, a new system of Interpreting Warrant Officer (WO) was introduced in the Korean Army under the directive of Korea’s Defense Ministry. The rationale of the system was to meet the increasing demands of translation and interpretation (T&I) from the joint operations of the Korea-U.S. Army. It also aimed at maintaining the continuity and upgrading the professionalism of T&I jobs in the army by complementing the existing system of Interpreting Officers (IOs). Earlier in 2012, the Korea Defense Language Institute (KDLI) was established to incorporate the foreign language training of the entire Korean armies (the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force including the IO education. Until 2012, IOs were selected and trained respectively by each army according to its characteristics and features. Now the incorporated IO training period is 12 weeks, just half of that for WOs. The curriculum for WOs and IOs is focused on T & I only, while the Advanced course for higher ranks has an introductory T & I class in its curriculum. This paper casts a glance at the history of defense interpreting and its education in Korea before and after the new system of WOs. For the newly-established system to take root, some parts in of the current education process need to be complemented to improve the level of Korea’s defense language services.

Abstract

In May, 2012, a new system of Interpreting Warrant Officer (WO) was introduced in the Korean Army under the directive of Korea’s Defense Ministry. The rationale of the system was to meet the increasing demands of translation and interpretation (T&I) from the joint operations of the Korea-U.S. Army. It also aimed at maintaining the continuity and upgrading the professionalism of T&I jobs in the army by complementing the existing system of Interpreting Officers (IOs). Earlier in 2012, the Korea Defense Language Institute (KDLI) was established to incorporate the foreign language training of the entire Korean armies (the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force including the IO education. Until 2012, IOs were selected and trained respectively by each army according to its characteristics and features. Now the incorporated IO training period is 12 weeks, just half of that for WOs. The curriculum for WOs and IOs is focused on T & I only, while the Advanced course for higher ranks has an introductory T & I class in its curriculum. This paper casts a glance at the history of defense interpreting and its education in Korea before and after the new system of WOs. For the newly-established system to take root, some parts in of the current education process need to be complemented to improve the level of Korea’s defense language services.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. Choi, Junghwa, "Be the Best! Become a Professional Interpreter, Translator!" (2004), Nexus Books
  2. Kwak, Joongchol, "On the Quality of Consecutive Interpreting for Press Conferences: with Emphasis on Recent Korea-US Cases", Interpreting and Translation Studies, 10(2), pp.1~26 (2007)
  3. 곽중철, "A Case Study of Misinterpreting in Korea-US Press Conferences", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.217~240 (2007), 한국번역학회
  4. 곽중철, "프리랜스와 인하우스 통역사 통역 비교 연구 ―2008년 한미정상 기자회견 통역 사례연구", 통번역학연구, 12(2), pp.1~50 (2009), 통번역연구소
  5. Lee, Joonsung, "Interpretation Officer Guide" (2011), Chekmaru
  6. 박헌일, "한국의 군사통역 품질평가에 대한 고찰: 통역장교의 평가 결과물 보고", 통번역학연구, 19(2), pp.159~181 (2015), 통번역연구소
  7. Sánchez, M. M. F, "Understanding the role of interpreting in the peacemaking process at the Korean armistice negotiations(Panmunjom 1953)", Interpreting and Translation Studies, 13(2), pp.229~249 (2010)
  8. Shin, Donghyun, "Interpreting Officers, The Patchers of Zaytun Division", Peace Keeping Operation Journal, 5, pp.15~16 (2012)
  9. Wright, Sue, "Language as a Contributing Factor in Conflicts Between States and Within States", Current Issues in Language & Society, 4(3), pp.215~237 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)