본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『辟疫神方』의 毒疫에 대한 고찰

A Study on ‘Dokyeok(毒疫)’ of Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方)

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

Objectives : Through the study on Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方), it would be expected to analyze Dokyeok(毒疫)’s characteristic and to comprehend how the changes in viewpoints of epidemic febrile disease were made. Methods : It has been done to analyze the original text of Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方), and to compare the theory of Onbyeongjobyeon(溫病條辨) associated with the signature symptom of Dokyeok(毒疫). Results : Heo Jun(許浚) experienced a specific epidemic disease called ‘Dokyeok(毒疫)’, on which he made observations and analyzed its features and wrote Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方). In Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方), ‘Dokyeok(毒疫)’ is characterized by rash[疹], its pathogenesis is warm temperature, thus its treatment principle is removing interior and exterior heat. The book's pragmatic perspective is highly appreciated, as HeoJun improved and solidified existing medical knowledge up to date. In addition, Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方) is significant in that it differentiated between macula[癍疹] and rash[疹], much earlier than the febrile disease school of the Qing dynasty. Conclusions : Between Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方) and Onbyeongjobyeon(溫病條辨), there are differences in treatments and patterns of rash[疹]. Based on this, it will be able to compare each disease that is written in two books. And a study on comparing the development between epidemic febrile disease[瘟疫學] of the Joseon dynasty and febrile disease[溫病學] of the Qing dynasty will be carried out with a follow-up study.

Abstract

Objectives : Through the study on Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方), it would be expected to analyze Dokyeok(毒疫)’s characteristic and to comprehend how the changes in viewpoints of epidemic febrile disease were made. Methods : It has been done to analyze the original text of Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方), and to compare the theory of Onbyeongjobyeon(溫病條辨) associated with the signature symptom of Dokyeok(毒疫). Results : Heo Jun(許浚) experienced a specific epidemic disease called ‘Dokyeok(毒疫)’, on which he made observations and analyzed its features and wrote Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方). In Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方), ‘Dokyeok(毒疫)’ is characterized by rash[疹], its pathogenesis is warm temperature, thus its treatment principle is removing interior and exterior heat. The book's pragmatic perspective is highly appreciated, as HeoJun improved and solidified existing medical knowledge up to date. In addition, Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方) is significant in that it differentiated between macula[癍疹] and rash[疹], much earlier than the febrile disease school of the Qing dynasty. Conclusions : Between Byeokyeoksinbang(辟疫神方) and Onbyeongjobyeon(溫病條辨), there are differences in treatments and patterns of rash[疹]. Based on this, it will be able to compare each disease that is written in two books. And a study on comparing the development between epidemic febrile disease[瘟疫學] of the Joseon dynasty and febrile disease[溫病學] of the Qing dynasty will be carried out with a follow-up study.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 三木榮, "朝鮮醫學史及疾病史", pp.58~60 (1963), 富士精版印刷株式會社
  2. 金信根, "韓國醫學大系(38)", pp.115~172 (1994), 麗江出版社
  3. 이수광, "芝峯類說", pp.310~ (1970), 경인문화사
  4. 洪元植, "精校黃帝內經素問", pp.234~276 (1985), 東洋醫學硏究院 出版部
  5. 虞搏, "醫學正傳", pp.58~ (1986), 成輔社
  6. 許浚, "新增補對譯 東醫寶鑑", pp.799~1798 (2012), 법인문화사
  7. 吳鞠通, "國譯 溫病條辨", pp.553~730 (2004), 집문당
  8. 최삼섭, "온병학", pp.39~ (1989), 성보사
  9. 신동원, "허준의 성홍열 연구 –동아시아 최초의 보고서-", 한국과학사학회지, 21(2), pp.143~156 (1999)
  10. 余永燕, "近代中醫防治傳染病重大創新之一 -對“猩紅熱”病的認識與防治", 中華中醫藥雜誌, 20(12), pp.716~ (2005)
  11. 余新忠, "爛喉痧出現年代初探", 中華醫史雜志, 31(2), pp.81~ (2001)
  12. 吳兆利, "爛喉丹痧溯源及古代文獻梳析", 中華中醫藥學刊, 30(6), pp.1305~ (2012)
  13. 조원준, "17세기 초 조선에서 유행한 '당독역'에 대한 연구 : 허준의 『벽역신방』을 중심으로", 박사, 한의학, pp.2004
  14. 진주표, "유완소의 화열론이 허준의 온역치료법에 미친 영향", 박사, 의사학(한의역사학), pp.2010
  15. 김상현, "『新纂辟瘟方』의 瘟疫 인식 및 辟疫書로서의 의의에 대한 고찰- 『東醫寶鑑∙瘟疫門』과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 대한한의학원전학회지, 26(4), pp.355~366 (2013), 대한한의학원전학회[DOI]
  16. "光海君日記 61卷, 4年(1612壬子)", 국사편찬위원회[URL]
  17. "光海君日記 71卷, 5年(1613癸丑)", 국사편찬위원회[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)