본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

협력과 대립 : 근대 중국 서의계(西醫界)의 파벌문제

Cooperation and Conflict: Faction Problem of Western Medicine Group in Modern China

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

After the defeat of the Opium War and the Sino-Japanese War, China’s intellectuals realized necessity of modernization (Westernization) to survive in the imperial order of the survival of the fittest. In particular, it was urgent to accept Western medicine and train the doctors who learned Western medicine to change the sick and weary Chinese to be robust. Thus, new occupations of the Western Medicine Group (xiyi, doctors who learned Western medicine) emerged in China. As with the first profession, the new Western Medicine Group tried to define standards of Western medicine and medical profession; however, it was difficult in the absence of the strong central government. In addition, they formed a faction by the country where they studied or the language they learned. The factions included the Britain - America faction(yingmeipai) consisting of the Britain - America studied doctors or graduates from Protestant missions based medical schools, and the Germany - Japan faction(deripai), graduates from medical schools by Japanese or German government and the Chinese government. In 1915, they founded the National Medical Association of China mainly consisting of the Britain - America faction and the National Medical and Pharmaceutical Association of China led by the Germany – Japan faction. Initially, exchanges were active so most of eminent doctors belonged the two associations at the same time. They had a consciousness of a common occupation group as a doctor who had learned Western medicine. Thus, they actively cooperated to keep their profits against Chinese medicine and enjoy their reputation. Their cooperation emitted light particularly in translation of medical terms and unified works. Thanks to cooperation, the two associations selected medical terminologies by properly using the cases of the West and Japan. Additionally, medical schools of the Britain - America faction and the Germany – Japan faction produced various levels of the Western Medicine Group doctors for China to timely respond to the rapidly increased demand. However, a conflict over the promotion of hygiene administration and the unification, organization of medical education did not end. This conflict was deepening as the Nanjing nationalist government promoted sanitary administration. It was the Britain - America faction who seized a chance of victory. It was because figures from the Britain - America faction held important positions in the hygiene department. Of course, some related to the National Medical and Pharmaceutical Association of China were also involved in the hygiene department; however, most took charge of simple technical tasks, not having a significant impact on hygiene administration. To solve the problem of factions of the Western Medicine Group, the Britain - America faction or the Germany - Japan faction had to arrange the education system with a strong power, or to organize a new association of two factions mixed, as in Chinese faction(zhonghuapai). But an effort of the Britain - America faction to unify the systems of medical schools did not reach the Germany - Japan faction’s medical schools. Additionally, from 1928, executives of the two Chinese medical associations discussed their merger; however they could not agree because of practitioners’interests involved. Substantially, a conflict between factions of the Western Medicine Group continued even until the mid-1930s. This implies that the then Chinese government had a lack of capacity of uniting and organizing the medical community.

Abstract

After the defeat of the Opium War and the Sino-Japanese War, China’s intellectuals realized necessity of modernization (Westernization) to survive in the imperial order of the survival of the fittest. In particular, it was urgent to accept Western medicine and train the doctors who learned Western medicine to change the sick and weary Chinese to be robust. Thus, new occupations of the Western Medicine Group (xiyi, doctors who learned Western medicine) emerged in China. As with the first profession, the new Western Medicine Group tried to define standards of Western medicine and medical profession; however, it was difficult in the absence of the strong central government. In addition, they formed a faction by the country where they studied or the language they learned. The factions included the Britain - America faction(yingmeipai) consisting of the Britain - America studied doctors or graduates from Protestant missions based medical schools, and the Germany - Japan faction(deripai), graduates from medical schools by Japanese or German government and the Chinese government. In 1915, they founded the National Medical Association of China mainly consisting of the Britain - America faction and the National Medical and Pharmaceutical Association of China led by the Germany – Japan faction. Initially, exchanges were active so most of eminent doctors belonged the two associations at the same time. They had a consciousness of a common occupation group as a doctor who had learned Western medicine. Thus, they actively cooperated to keep their profits against Chinese medicine and enjoy their reputation. Their cooperation emitted light particularly in translation of medical terms and unified works. Thanks to cooperation, the two associations selected medical terminologies by properly using the cases of the West and Japan. Additionally, medical schools of the Britain - America faction and the Germany – Japan faction produced various levels of the Western Medicine Group doctors for China to timely respond to the rapidly increased demand. However, a conflict over the promotion of hygiene administration and the unification, organization of medical education did not end. This conflict was deepening as the Nanjing nationalist government promoted sanitary administration. It was the Britain - America faction who seized a chance of victory. It was because figures from the Britain - America faction held important positions in the hygiene department. Of course, some related to the National Medical and Pharmaceutical Association of China were also involved in the hygiene department; however, most took charge of simple technical tasks, not having a significant impact on hygiene administration. To solve the problem of factions of the Western Medicine Group, the Britain - America faction or the Germany - Japan faction had to arrange the education system with a strong power, or to organize a new association of two factions mixed, as in Chinese faction(zhonghuapai). But an effort of the Britain - America faction to unify the systems of medical schools did not reach the Germany - Japan faction’s medical schools. Additionally, from 1928, executives of the two Chinese medical associations discussed their merger; however they could not agree because of practitioners’interests involved. Substantially, a conflict between factions of the Western Medicine Group continued even until the mid-1930s. This implies that the then Chinese government had a lack of capacity of uniting and organizing the medical community.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. "申報", ~
  2. "中華民國醫事衛生の 現狀", ~
  3. "醫事棄刊", ~
  4. "中西醫學報", ~
  5. "中華醫學雜誌", ~
  6. 中國藥學會, "中國藥學會史" (2008), 上海交通大學出版社
  7. 中華民國內政部年鑑編纂委員會編, "內政年鑑 2" (1936), 商務印書館
  8. 陳邦賢, "中國醫學史" (1937), 商務印書館
  9. ハロルド, "支那と近代醫學: 支那醫療傳道史" (1941), 新生堂
  10. Balme,Harold, "China, and Modern Medicine: A Study in Medical Missionary Development" (1921), United Council for Missionary Education
  11. National Medical Association of China, "The National MedicalJournal of China" (1915)
  12. The China, "Medical Journal" (1925), The China Medical Association
  13. "The China Medical Journal" (1907), The China Medical Missionary Association
  14. "The Chinese Medical Journal English Section" (1932), The Chinese Medical Association
  15. Wong K. Chimin, "History of Chinese Medicine: Being a Chronicle of Medical Happenings in China from Ancient Times to the Present Period" (1932), The Tientsin Press
  16. 신규환, "民國時期 醫師免許制度의 成立過程과 醫師의 社會的 地位", 동양사학연구, (114), pp.155~182 (2011), 동양사학회
  17. 이만열, "한국기독교의료사" (2003), 아카넷
  18. 조정은, "中國醫療傳道協會의 역할 ― 초기 활동을 중심으로(1886~1907) ―", 명청사연구, (37), pp.197~243 (2012), 명청사학회[DOI]
  19. 조정은, "20세기 초 중국 미션계 병원의 토착화 - 경제적 자립에 대한 의료선교사의 동향을 중심으로 -", 명청사연구, (43), pp.291~323 (2015), 명청사학회
  20. 조정은, "중국 근대 미션계 의학교의 발전과 토착화 -의학교육 체계화를 위한 논의를 중심으로-", 韓國史學史學報, (31), pp.233~270 (2015), 한국사학사학회
  21. 하자마나오키, "데이터로본중국근대사" (1999), 신서원
  22. 高秋萍, "中國衛生防疫事業的開創者:金寶善", pp.43~47 (1994), 民國春秋
  23. 金寶善, "舊中國的西醫派別與衛生事業的演變", pp.107~111 (2003), 報告文學
  24. 陶飛亞, "近代醫學共同體的嬉變 : 从博醫會到中華醫學會", 歷史研究, pp.79~95 (2014)
  25. 杜孝賢, "中華文史資料文庫 16", pp.779~783 (1996), 中國文史出版社
  26. 劉遠明, "中華醫學會與民國時期的醫療衛生體制化", 貴州社會科學, 6, pp.164~168 (2007)
  27. 劉遠明, "中華醫學會與博醫會的合作及合併", 自然辨證法研究, 2, pp.93~98 (2012)
  28. 馬伯英, "中外醫學文化交流史" (1997), 전파과학사
  29. 金寶善與民國中醫醫政, "金寶善與民國中醫醫政" (2007), 南京中醫藥大學學報(社會科學版)
  30. 範鐵權, "中華民國醫藥學會述論", 醫學與哲學(A), pp.94~97 (2015)
  31. 傅惠, "中華文史資料文庫 16" (1996), 中國文史出版社
  32. 徐小群, "民國時期的國家與社會: 自由職業團體在上海的興起,1912-1937" (2007), 新星出版社
  33. 薛愚, "中國藥學史料" (1984), 人民衛生出版社
  34. 温昌斌, "國科技譯名統一工作實踐與理論" (2011), 商務印書館
  35. 牛亞華, "淸末留 日醫學生及其對中國近代醫學事業的貢獻", 中國科技史料, 24(3), pp.228~243 (2003)
  36. 尹倩, "分化和融合: 論民國醫師團體的發展特點", 甘肅社會科學, pp.22~27 (2008)
  37. 尹倩, "民國時期的醫師群體研究(1912-1937): 以上海爲討論中心" (2013), 中國社會科學出版
  38. 張大慶, "中國近代的科學名詞審查活動: 1915-1927", 自然辨證法通訊, 18(5), pp.47~52 (1996)
  39. 鄭鐵禱, "中國醫學通史 近代卷", 人民衛生出版社 (2000)
  40. 趙洪韵, "近代中西醫論爭史" (1989), 安徽科學技術出版社
  41. 中華醫學會, "中華醫學會會史槪覽 1915-2010", 中華醫學會 (2010)
  42. 秦國攀, "中華醫學會研究(1915 1937)", 석사, pp.2010
  43. 都萬富, "國民政府時期西醫界內部的派系糾葛", 蘭臺世界, pp.81~82 (2014)
  44. 夏緩緩, "民國時期的醫學敎育制度與醫生地位的變化", 醫學與哲學, pp.75~79 (2011)
  45. 夏緩緩, "民國初期西醫敎育的建構研究" (2014), 科學出版社
  46. 郝先中, "日本廢除漢醫對中國近代醫學的影響", 西學院學報, pp.69~72 (2005)
  47. 郝先中, "同道之間: 民國時期西醫本土化進程中的派系紛爭", 西學院學報, pp.93~99 (2015)
  48. ラルフ• C•クロイツァー, "近代中國の傳統醫學:中國で傳統醫學 が生き殘ったのか" (1994), 創元社
  49. 見城梯治, "戰前期留日醫藥學生の歸國後の活動と現代中国における評価: 千葉醫學専門學校․千葉醫科大學中國留學生の事例", 國際敎育, 3, pp.71~114 (2010)
  50. 飯島渉, "ペストと近代中國" (2000), 研文出版
  51. 福士由紀, "近代上海と公衆衛生: 防疫の都市社會史" (2010), 御茶の水書房
  52. 姚毅, "近代中國の出産と國家• 社會:醫師 • 助産士 • 接生婆" (2011), 研文出版
  53. 曹貞恩, "中國醫療傳道協會力から中華醫學會へ", 東洋學報, 95(4), pp.1~27 (2014)
  54. Croizier, Ralph C, "Traditional Medicine in Modern China: Science,Nationalism, and the Tensions of Cultural Change" (1968), Harvard University Press
  55. Shen Xiao Hong, "Yale's China and China's Yale: Americanizing Higher Education in China, 1900-1927", 박사, pp.1993

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)