Comparison of Short Curved Stems and Standard-length Single Wedged Stems for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes with use of short-curved stems versus standard-length single wedged stems over a minimum follow-up period of five years. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of primary total hip arthroplasties performed using the Fitmore® stem (127 hips, 122 patients) and the M/L taper® stem (195 hips, 187 patients) between October 2012 and June 2014 was conducted. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were obtained for evaluation over a minimum follow-up period of five years. Results: In both the Fitmore® and M/L taper® groups, the mean Harris hip score improved from 52.4 and 48.9 preoperatively to 93.3 and 94.5 at the final follow-up, respectively (P=0.980). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores also improved from 73.3 and 76.8 preoperatively to 22.9 and 25.6 at the final follow-up, respectively (P=0.465). Fifteen hips (Fitmore® : 14 hips; M/L taper® : one hip, P<0.001) developed intraoperative cracks and were treated simultaneously with cerclage wiring. Radiography showed a radiolucent line in 24 hips in the Fitmore® group and 12 hips in the M/L taper® group (P=0.125). Cortical hypertrophy was detected in 29 hips (Fitmore® group: 28 hips; M/L taper® group: one hip, P<0.001). Conclusion: Similarly favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes were achieved with use of both short-curved stems and standard-length single wedged stems. However, higher cortical hypertrophy and a higher rate of femoral crack were observed with use of Fitmore® stems.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes with use of short-curved stems versus standard-length single wedged stems over a minimum follow-up period of five years. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of primary total hip arthroplasties performed using the Fitmore® stem (127 hips, 122 patients) and the M/L taper® stem (195 hips, 187 patients) between October 2012 and June 2014 was conducted. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were obtained for evaluation over a minimum follow-up period of five years. Results: In both the Fitmore® and M/L taper® groups, the mean Harris hip score improved from 52.4 and 48.9 preoperatively to 93.3 and 94.5 at the final follow-up, respectively (P=0.980). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores also improved from 73.3 and 76.8 preoperatively to 22.9 and 25.6 at the final follow-up, respectively (P=0.465). Fifteen hips (Fitmore® : 14 hips; M/L taper® : one hip, P<0.001) developed intraoperative cracks and were treated simultaneously with cerclage wiring. Radiography showed a radiolucent line in 24 hips in the Fitmore® group and 12 hips in the M/L taper® group (P=0.125). Cortical hypertrophy was detected in 29 hips (Fitmore® group: 28 hips; M/L taper® group: one hip, P<0.001). Conclusion: Similarly favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes were achieved with use of both short-curved stems and standard-length single wedged stems. However, higher cortical hypertrophy and a higher rate of femoral crack were observed with use of Fitmore® stems.
참고문헌 (24)
- Burchard R, "Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions – a comparing finite elements analysis", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 18, pp.343~ (2017)[DOI]
- Stulberg SD, "The short stem : promises and pitfalls", Bone Joint J, 95-B(11 Suppl A), pp.57~62 (2013)[DOI]
- Kim YH, "Ultra-short bone conserving cementless femoral stem", Hip Pelvis, 33, pp.181~189 (2021)[DOI]
- Koyano G, "Comparison of bone remodeling between an anatomic short stem and a straight stem in 1-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.594~600 (2017)[DOI]
- Maier MW, "Cortical hypertrophy with a short, curved uncemented hip stem does not have any clinical impact during early follow-up", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 16, pp.371~ (2015)[DOI]
- Gustke K, "Short stems for total hip arthroplasty : initial experience with the Fitmore stem", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94(11 Suppl A), pp.47~51 (2012)[DOI]
- Grant TW, "Cementless tapered wedge femoral stems decrease subsidence in obese patients compared to traditional fit-and-fill stems", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.891~897 (2017)[DOI]
- Ishii S, "Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of Asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, taperedwedge stem?", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.1524~1528 (2016)[DOI]
- Kim JT, "Does proximally coated single-wedge cementless stem work well in Dorr Type C femurs? Minimum 10-year followup", Indian J Orthop, 53, pp.94~101 (2019)[DOI]
- Lim YW, "Minimum 10-year follow-up of micro-arc oxidation coating on a cementless grit-blasted tapered-wedge stem of total hip arthroplasty : a multicentre study", Hip Int, 32, pp.501~509 (2022)[DOI]
- Nebergall AK, "Stable fixation of a cementless, proximally coated, double wedged, double tapered femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty : a 5-year radiostereometric analysis", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.1267~1274 (2016)[DOI]
- Carlson SW, "Minimum 10-year follow-up of cementless total hip arthroplasty using a contemporary triple-tapered titanium stem", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.2231~2236 (2016)[DOI]
- Cho KJ, "Midterm results of fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty", Indian J Orthop, 53, pp.630~636 (2019)[DOI]
- Park KS, "Modified minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthroplasty using large diameter femoral head", Indian J Orthop, 46, pp.29~35 (2012)[DOI]
- Harris WH, "Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures : treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51, pp.737~755 (1969)
- McConnell S, "The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC) : a review of its utility and measurement properties", Arthritis Rheum, 45, pp.453~461 (2001)[DOI]
- Zmolek JC, "Revision total hip arthroplasty. The use of solid allograft", J Arthroplasty, 8, pp.361~370 (1993)[DOI]
- Gruen TA, ""Modes of failure"of cemented stem-type femoral components : a radiographic analysis of loosening", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (141), pp.17~27 (1979)
- Brooker AF, "Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 55, pp.1629~1632 (1973)
- Thalmann C, "Prospective 5-year study with 96 short curved Fitmore™ hip stems shows a high incidence of cortical hypertrophy with no clinical relevance", J Orthop Surg Res, 14, pp.156~ (2019)[DOI]
- Cho YJ, "Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after hip arthroplasty using a cementless doubletapered femoral stem", J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 24, pp.317~322 (2016)[DOI]
- Crawford DA, "Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy not associated with thigh pain using a short stem femoral implant", Hip Int, 31, pp.722~728 (2021)[DOI]
- Hayashi S, "Risk factors of thigh pain following total hip arthroplasty with short, tapered-wedge stem", Int Orthop, 44, pp.2553~2558 (2020)[DOI]
- Amendola RL, "Two-to 4-year followup of a short stem THA construct : excellent fixation, thigh pain a concern", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 475, pp.375~383 (2017)[DOI]