Total Hip Arthroplasty in Protrusio Acetabuli: A Systematic Review
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Protrusio acetabuli, or abnormal protrusion of the femoral head into the acetabulum, requires performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) for which various reconstruction techniques and outcomes have been described. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence, evaluate treatment efficacy, compare surgical techniques, and identify topics for future research along with improving evidence-based decision-making, improving patient outcomes in the management of this condition. A thorough systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Scopus library was conducted, and articles describing techniques of THA for treatment of protrusion acetabuli were extracted. The initial search generated 751 results. After exclusion, 18 articles were included. Of these, eight were prospective studies and 10 were retrospective. Surgery was performed on 783 hips with a mean age of 60 years; 80% of females who mostly had inflammatory arthritis were followed up for 8.86 years (range, 2-15.4 years). Good outcomes have been achieved with THA using uncemented cups with bone graft; however, no conclusion could be drawn with regard to the femoral side. It can be concluded that the concept of restoration of the anatomical hip center of rotation is paramount for good outcome and better survival of the implant is important when using uncemented cups with a bone graft. In addition, screw augmentation for fixation is not recommended unless absolutely necessary. The most common complications were aseptic loosening and heterotopic ossification. While the former required revision, conservative management was administered for the latter.
Abstract
Protrusio acetabuli, or abnormal protrusion of the femoral head into the acetabulum, requires performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) for which various reconstruction techniques and outcomes have been described. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence, evaluate treatment efficacy, compare surgical techniques, and identify topics for future research along with improving evidence-based decision-making, improving patient outcomes in the management of this condition. A thorough systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Scopus library was conducted, and articles describing techniques of THA for treatment of protrusion acetabuli were extracted. The initial search generated 751 results. After exclusion, 18 articles were included. Of these, eight were prospective studies and 10 were retrospective. Surgery was performed on 783 hips with a mean age of 60 years; 80% of females who mostly had inflammatory arthritis were followed up for 8.86 years (range, 2-15.4 years). Good outcomes have been achieved with THA using uncemented cups with bone graft; however, no conclusion could be drawn with regard to the femoral side. It can be concluded that the concept of restoration of the anatomical hip center of rotation is paramount for good outcome and better survival of the implant is important when using uncemented cups with a bone graft. In addition, screw augmentation for fixation is not recommended unless absolutely necessary. The most common complications were aseptic loosening and heterotopic ossification. While the former required revision, conservative management was administered for the latter.
참고문헌 (31)
- Sculco PK, "The diagnosis and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty : an international consensus symposium", HSS J, 18, pp.8~41 (2022)[DOI]
- Baghdadi YM, "Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.3251~3259 (2013)[DOI]
- Zhen P, "Total hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular protrusions secondary to rheumatoid arthritis", J Orthop Surg Res, 13, pp.92~ (2018)[DOI]
- D'Apolito R, "Uncemented cups and impaction bone grafting for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty : a review of rationale, indications, and outcomes", Materials(Basel), 15, pp.3728~ (2022)[DOI]
- Erivan R, "Use of morselized allografts for acetabular reconstruction during THA revision : French multicenter study of 508 cases with 8 years' average follow-up", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 105, pp.957~966 (2019)[DOI]
- Lee JM, "Acetabular cup revision arthroplasty using morselized impaction allograft", Hip Pelvis, 30, pp.65~77 (2018)[DOI]
- Singh A, "THA in patients with neglected acetabular fractures", SICOT J, 8, pp.37~ (2022)
- Baghdadi YM, "Long-term results of the uncemented acetabular component in a primary total hip arthroplasty performed for protrusio acetabuli : a fifteen year median follow-up", Int Orthop, 39, pp.839~845 (2015)[DOI]
- Figueras Coll G, "Results of acetabular wiremesh and autograft in protrusio acetabuli", Hip Int, 18, pp.23~28 (2008)[DOI]
- Dutka J, "Total hip arthroplasty with bone grafts for protrusio acetabuli", Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 13, pp.469~477 (2011)[DOI]
- Gates HS 3rd, "Radiographic measurements in protrusio acetabuli", J Arthroplasty, 4, pp.347~351 (1989)[DOI]
- Hansen E, "Revision total hip arthroplasty for large medial(protrusio)defects with a rim-fit cementless acetabular component", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.72~79 (2006)[DOI]
- Johnsson R, "Total hip replacement with spongious bone graft for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis", Acta Orthop Scand, 55, pp.510~513 (1984)[DOI]
- Kondo K, "Total hip arthroplasty with bone graft for acetabular protrusion in rheumatoid arthritis", Mod Rheumatol, 12, pp.219~225 (2002)[DOI]
- Krushell RJ, "Primary total hip arthroplasty using a dual-geometry cup to treat protrusio acetabuli", J Arthroplasty, 23, pp.1128~1131 (2008)[DOI]
- Lee BS, "Is restoration of hip center mandatory for total hip arthroplasty of protrusio acetabuli?", Hip Pelvis, 34, pp.106~114 (2022)[DOI]
- Liu P, "Cementless total hip arthroplasty for treatment of acetabular protrusion secondary to rheumatoid arthritis", J Orthop Surg Res, 18, pp.282~ (2023)[DOI]
- Matsuno H, "Cementless cup supporter for protrusio acetabuli in patients with rheumatoid arthritis", Int Orthop, 24, pp.15~18 (2000)[DOI]
- Mibe J, "Results of total hip arthroplasty with bone graft and support ring for protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis", J Orthop Sci, 10, pp.8~14 (2005)[DOI]
- Mullaji AB, "Primary total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli using impacted morsellized bone grafting and cementless cups : a medium-term radiographic review", J Arthroplasty, 22, pp.1143~1149 (2007)[DOI]
- Rosenberg WW, "Impacted morsellized bone grafting and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis : an 8-to 18-year follow-up study of 36 hips", Acta Orthop Scand, 71, pp.143~146 (2000)[DOI]
- Yun A, "Managing protrusio acetabuli with a direct anterior approach total hip replacement", Cureus, 13, pp.e14048~ (2021)[DOI]
- Zuh SG, "Acetabuloplasty with bone grafting in uncemented hip replacement for protrusion", Int Orthop, 39, pp.1757~1763 (2015)[DOI]
- Ranawat CS, "Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 62, pp.1059~1065 (1980)
- "Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot", 1993, 281~284
- Fujii M, "Is Ranawat triangle method accurate in estimating hip joint center in Japanese population?", J Orthop Sci, 26, pp.219~224 (2021)[DOI]
- Ranawat CS, "Role of bone grafting in correction of protrusio acetabuli by total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 1, pp.131~137 (1986)[DOI]
- Buma P, "Impacted graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision. Histological evaluation in 8patients", Acta Orthop Scand, 67, pp.536~540 (1996)[DOI]
- Mirza AH, "A review and description of acetabular impaction bone grafting : updating the traditional technique", Hip Pelvis, 33, pp.173~180 (2021)[DOI]
- "Rev Chil Ortop Traumatol", 2021, e127~e135, 10.1055[DOI]
- Mullaji AB, "Acetabular protrusio : surgical technique of dealing with a problem in depth", Bone Joint J, 95-B(11 Suppl A), pp.37~40 (2013)[DOI]