본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mid-term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after Acetabular Fracture

Sharath K. Ramanath|Tejas Tribhuvan|Uday Chandran|Rahul Hemant Shah|Ajay Kaushik|Sandesh Patil
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)|2024.03|Hip and Pelvis|제36권 제1호|pp. 37-46

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Post-traumatic arthritisHip arthroplastyHip replacementPost acetabular hip replacement

초록

Purpose: The prognosis of total hip replacement (THR) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus THR following non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures is unclear. Few studies have been conducted in this regard. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to perform an assessment and compare the functional outcomes for study subjects in the ORIF and non-ORIF groups during the follow-up period compared to baseline. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal comparative study, which included 40 patients who underwent THR for either posttraumatic arthritis after fixation of an acetabular fracture or arthritis following conservative management of a fracture, was conducted for 60 months. Twenty-four patients had undergone ORIF, and 16 patients had undergone nonoperative/conservative management for acetabular fractures. Following THR, the patients were followed up for monitoring of functional outcomes for the Harris hip score (HHS) and comparison between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups was performed. Results: The HHS showed significant improvement in both ORIF and non-ORIF groups. At the end of the mean follow-up period, no significant variation in scores was observed between the groups, i.e., ORIF group (91.61±6.64) compared to nonORIF group (85.74±11.56). A significantly higher number of re-interventions were required for medial wall fractures and combined fractures compared to posterior fractures (P<0.05). Conclusion: THR resulted in improved functional outcome during follow-up in both the groups; however, the ORIF group was observed to have better functional outcome. Re-intervention was not required for any of the posterior fractures at the end of the mean follow-up period.

Abstract

Purpose: The prognosis of total hip replacement (THR) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus THR following non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures is unclear. Few studies have been conducted in this regard. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to perform an assessment and compare the functional outcomes for study subjects in the ORIF and non-ORIF groups during the follow-up period compared to baseline. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal comparative study, which included 40 patients who underwent THR for either posttraumatic arthritis after fixation of an acetabular fracture or arthritis following conservative management of a fracture, was conducted for 60 months. Twenty-four patients had undergone ORIF, and 16 patients had undergone nonoperative/conservative management for acetabular fractures. Following THR, the patients were followed up for monitoring of functional outcomes for the Harris hip score (HHS) and comparison between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups was performed. Results: The HHS showed significant improvement in both ORIF and non-ORIF groups. At the end of the mean follow-up period, no significant variation in scores was observed between the groups, i.e., ORIF group (91.61±6.64) compared to nonORIF group (85.74±11.56). A significantly higher number of re-interventions were required for medial wall fractures and combined fractures compared to posterior fractures (P<0.05). Conclusion: THR resulted in improved functional outcome during follow-up in both the groups; however, the ORIF group was observed to have better functional outcome. Re-intervention was not required for any of the posterior fractures at the end of the mean follow-up period.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Hoge S, "StatPearls" (2023), StatPearls Publishing
  2. Gautam D, "Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures", J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11, pp.1090~1098 (2020)[DOI]
  3. Smits I, "Hip function after surgically treated isolated traumatic acetabular fracture : a prospective series of consecutive cases", Hip Pelvis, 35, pp.133~141 (2023)[DOI]
  4. Henry PDG, "Risk of hip arthroplasty after open reduction internal fixation of a fracture of the acetabulum : a matched cohort study", J Orthop Trauma, 32, pp.134~140 (2018)[DOI]
  5. Walley KC, "Comparison of outcomes of operative versus non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly and severely comorbid patient", Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 27, pp.689~694 (2017)[DOI]
  6. Telleria JJ, "Classifications in brief : Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.3725~3730 (2013)[DOI]
  7. Longo UG, "Hip scores : a current concept review", Br Med Bull, 131, pp.81~96 (2019)[DOI]
  8. Singh JA, "Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 17, pp.256~ (2016)[DOI]
  9. Kumar P, "Reliability of Modified Harris Hip Score as a tool for outcome evaluation of Total Hip Replacements in Indian population", J Clin Orthop Trauma, 10, pp.128~130 (2019)[DOI]
  10. Gandbhir VN, "StatPearls" (2023), StatPearls Publishing
  11. El-Bakoury A, "The outcome of the uncemented acetabular component in delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures", Bone Jt Open, 2, pp.1067~1074 (2021)[DOI]
  12. DC S, "Uncemented total hip replacement after two years of neglected hip dislocation with fracture of posterior column and wall of the acetabulum", Trauma Mon, 21, pp.e25301~ (2016)
  13. Sierra RJ, "Acetabular fractures : the role of total hip replacement", Bone Joint J, 95-B(11 Suppl A), pp.11~16 (2013)[DOI]
  14. Schreurs BW, "Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (437), pp.145~151 (2005)[DOI]
  15. Jimenez ML, "Total hip replacement after acetabular fracture", Orthop Clin North Am, 28, pp.435~446 (1997)[DOI]
  16. Romness DW, "Total hip arthroplasty after fracture of the acetabulum. Long-term results", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 72, pp.761~764 (1990)[DOI]
  17. van den Broek M, "Total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual mobility cup into a fully porous multihole cup with variable angle locking screws for acetabular fractures in the frail elderly", Hip Pelvis, 35, pp.54~61 (2023)[DOI]
  18. Lizaur-Utrilla A, "Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture : a prospective, matched-cohort study", J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 73, pp.232~238 (2012)[DOI]
  19. Ranawat A, "Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.759~767 (2009)[DOI]
  20. Zhang L, "Total hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of acetabular fractures : a 5-year follow-up study", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.1189~1193 (2011)[DOI]
  21. Huo MH, "Total hip replacements done without cement after acetabular fractures : a 4-to 8-year follow-up study", J Arthroplasty, 14, pp.827~831 (1999)[DOI]
  22. Berry DJ, "Uncemented acetabular components for arthritis after acetabular fracture", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (405), pp.164~167 (2002)[DOI]
  23. Lee YK, "Use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis of the hip", J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 27, pp.2309499019836378~ (2019)[DOI]
  24. Bellabarba C, "Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83, pp.868~876 (2001)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Analysis of Predictors of Results after Surgical Treatment of Acetabular Fractures고태식, 신종기, 안성진, 이정섭대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2015 · 제27권 제2호Fucntional and Radiological Outcome of Surgical Management of Acetabular Fractures in Tertiary Care HospitalFaizan Iqbal, Intikhab Taufiq, Muhammad Kazim Raheem Najjad, Naveed Khan, Osama Bin Zia대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2016 · 제28권 제4호Cup-Cage Construct Using Porous Cup with Burch-Schneider Cage in the Management of Complex Acetabular FracturesDeepak Gautam, Rajesh Malhotra대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2019 · 제31권 제2호Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cemented Dual Mobility Cup into a Fully Porous Multihole Cup with Variable Angle Locking Screws for Acetabular Fractures in the Frail ElderlyKris Govaers, Mathias van den Broek대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2023 · 제35권 제1호Effectiveness of Hip Arthroscopy Performed Simultaneously before Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acetabular Fracture and Fracture-dislocation of the Hip김성수, 김현준, 이경호, 정영훈대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2018 · 제30권 제2호Periprosthetic Acetabular Fracture after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Report on Two CasesChan Young Lee, Joonkyoo Kang, Kyung-Soon Park, Taek-Rim Yoon대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Gout Arthritis; including Gout Arthritis of Hip Joint: A Literature ReviewYonghan Cha, Wonsik Choy, Jae Sun Lee, Jongwon Lee, Hyun Hee Lee, Dong-Sik Chaepp. 1-11Total Hip Arthroplasty in Protrusio Acetabuli: A Systematic ReviewBalgovind S. Raja, Tushar Gupta, Pranav J., Roop Bhushan Kalia, Sajid Ansari, Kshitij Guptapp. 12-25The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip ArthroplastyAndreas Fontalis, Ahmed Magan, Ricci Plastow, Fares S. Haddad, Fabio Mancinopp. 26-36Prevalence of Venous Thromboembolism after Immediate Screening in Hip Fracture PatientsJoo-Hyoun Song, Kee-Haeng Lee, Yoon-Vin Kim, Young-Wook Lim, Woo-Lam Jo, Seung-Hun Happ. 47-54Bone Health Evaluations and Secondary Fragility Fractures in Hip Fracture PatientsEmily M. Pflug, Ariana Lott, Sanjit R. Konda, Philipp Leucht, Nirmal Tejwani, Kenneth A. Egolpp. 55-61
원문 보기