본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제강점기 조선총독부의 결핵 정책(1910 -1945): 소극적 규제로 시작된 대응과 한계

Anti-Tuberculosis Policy of the Government General of Korea during Japanese-Colonial Period (1910-1945): From Simple Restriction to Active Enlightenment

2

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In this paper, I tried to examine the characteristic of anti-tuberculosispolicy in colonial Korea and find out internal constraint of hygienicadministration by Japanese government during Japanese-Colonial Period. Despite of high prevalence of tuberculosis among Japanese in Korea, theJapanese Government General of Korea had done almost nothing until1936. Japan’s hygienic administration was highly dependent upon hygienicpolice, and mainly with compulsory isolation and disinfection. It wasinefficient in tuberculosis problem. In 1918, Japanese Government Generalenacted ‘Ordinance of Prevention of Tuberculosis’, solely based uponnaive tuberculosis etiology in sputum; consisted of simple crackdown andisolation and had no effect due to the limit of anti-tuberculosis and healthbudget. Also the ordinance actually set limitation upon the tuberculosisfacilities, only a few health care facilities could be affordable for tuberculosis patients. Since 1936, the Japanese Government General of Korea begantuberculosis prevention measures in earnest. Due to the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II, there was urgent need to make Koreansociety and population as “safe, and healthy rear area”. The Governmentorganized ‘Chosen Anti-tuberculosis Association’ and highly pursuedenlightment campaign. It was almost temporary measures of enlightenmentand publicity. Also various types of health screening and tuberculosisprevalence research were introduced to Korean people. But it was not soeffective to identify tuberculosis problem in Korea. Mass tuberculin test andX-ray test was introduced, but it was not well organized and scientificallydesigned. Besides, tuberculosis treatment facility was extremely rarebecause of strict isolation and high standard policy. Japanese Governemtnset numerous tuberculosis-counseling centers and mobilized public doctorfor consulting tuberculosis, but the accessibility of centers was very low. Moreover, there was no source to establish facilities like sanatorium. TheJapanese Government General of Korea was constantly suffered fromlimit of budget and a lot of Japanese in Korea had no inherent motivefor installing sanatorium and anti-tuberculosis measures. As the result,the effort made by Japanese Government General of Korea to diminishtuberculosis in Korea failed during the wartime.

Abstract

In this paper, I tried to examine the characteristic of anti-tuberculosispolicy in colonial Korea and find out internal constraint of hygienicadministration by Japanese government during Japanese-Colonial Period. Despite of high prevalence of tuberculosis among Japanese in Korea, theJapanese Government General of Korea had done almost nothing until1936. Japan’s hygienic administration was highly dependent upon hygienicpolice, and mainly with compulsory isolation and disinfection. It wasinefficient in tuberculosis problem. In 1918, Japanese Government Generalenacted ‘Ordinance of Prevention of Tuberculosis’, solely based uponnaive tuberculosis etiology in sputum; consisted of simple crackdown andisolation and had no effect due to the limit of anti-tuberculosis and healthbudget. Also the ordinance actually set limitation upon the tuberculosisfacilities, only a few health care facilities could be affordable for tuberculosis patients. Since 1936, the Japanese Government General of Korea begantuberculosis prevention measures in earnest. Due to the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II, there was urgent need to make Koreansociety and population as “safe, and healthy rear area”. The Governmentorganized ‘Chosen Anti-tuberculosis Association’ and highly pursuedenlightment campaign. It was almost temporary measures of enlightenmentand publicity. Also various types of health screening and tuberculosisprevalence research were introduced to Korean people. But it was not soeffective to identify tuberculosis problem in Korea. Mass tuberculin test andX-ray test was introduced, but it was not well organized and scientificallydesigned. Besides, tuberculosis treatment facility was extremely rarebecause of strict isolation and high standard policy. Japanese Governemtnset numerous tuberculosis-counseling centers and mobilized public doctorfor consulting tuberculosis, but the accessibility of centers was very low. Moreover, there was no source to establish facilities like sanatorium. TheJapanese Government General of Korea was constantly suffered fromlimit of budget and a lot of Japanese in Korea had no inherent motivefor installing sanatorium and anti-tuberculosis measures. As the result,the effort made by Japanese Government General of Korea to diminishtuberculosis in Korea failed during the wartime.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. "東亞日報", ~
  2. "每日申報", ~
  3. "朝鮮日報", ~
  4. 太虛, "病魔의 樂園 朝鮮", 동광 (1931)
  5. "京城日報", ~
  6. "道 起債 繼續費 醫務 負擔 權利 抛棄 消防費ニ關スル綴", ~
  7. "道 起債 繼續費 醫務 負擔 夫役 賦課ニ關スル綴", ~
  8. "朝鮮道立醫院要覽"
  9. "朝鮮防疫統計", ~
  10. "朝鮮總督府官報", ~
  11. "朝鮮總督府統計年報", ~
  12. "肺結核病の注意書", 警務彙報 (1913)
  13. "昭和十二年度衛生事務計劃", 警務彙報 (1937)
  14. "京畿道結核豫防業績", 鮮滿醫藥時報 (1937)
  15. "成大病院 岩正內科座談會", 朝鮮及滿洲 (1931)
  16. 京城都市計畫硏究所, "朝鮮都市問題會議錄", 京城都市計劃硏究會, ~ (1936)
  17. 京城醫師會, "京城醫師會二十五周年誌" (1932), 京城醫師會
  18. 京城帝國大學, "京城帝國大學一覽" (1942), 京城帝國大學
  19. 古海嚴潮, "肺結核豫防規則の制定", 朝鮮彙報 (1918)
  20. 關水武, "朝鮮の衛生狀態と傳染病に就て", 朝鮮及滿洲 (1923)
  21. 內部衛生局, "韓國衛生一班" (1909), 內部衛生局
  22. 裵永基, "平壤に於ける街路上喀痰中結核菌檢出", 滿鮮之醫界 (1935)
  23. 白石保成, "朝鮮衛生要義", ~ (1918)
  24. 白十字會, "日本結核豫防事業總攬" (1938), 白十字會
  25. 卜部正一, "保菌者に就て", 警務彙報 (1920)
  26. 西龜三圭, "朝鮮癩豫防協會事業槪要" (1935), 朝鮮癩豫防協會
  27. 西龜三圭, "國民體位の向上に就いて", 朝鮮及滿洲 (1937)
  28. 西龜三圭, "時局と結核豫防", 警務彙報 (1938)
  29. 西龜三圭, "銃後の結核豫防施設", 朝鮮及滿洲 (1938)
  30. 西龜三圭, "結核豫防は‘心の持ら方’から", 警務彙報 (1938)
  31. 小串政次, "朝鮮衛生行政法要論", ~ (1921)
  32. 陸軍省大日記, "結核予防国民運動振興に関する件", 1936년 6월 19일, ~ (1936)
  33. 荻野正俊, "衛生上から觀た京城府民", 朝鮮及滿洲 (1934)
  34. 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮衛生事情要覽" (1922), 朝鮮總督府
  35. 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮衛生要覽" (1929), 朝鮮總督府
  36. 朝鮮總督府內務局社會課, "朝鮮社會事業要覽" (1924), 朝鮮總督府
  37. 志賀潔, "痘瘡の傳染と朝鮮の傳染病に就て", 朝鮮及滿洲 (1923)
  38. 厚生省医務局, "傳染病豫防法, In 醫制百年史資料編" (1976), 厚生省医務局
  39. "The General Medical Situation in Korea", Korean Mission Field, 18(7) (1922)
  40. General Council of Evangelical Missions in Korea, "(The)Korea Missions Yearbook", Christian Literature Society of Korea, ~ (1932)
  41. Murray, Florence, "At the foot of Dragon Hill" (1975), E.P. Dutton
  42. 대한결핵협회, "韓國結核史" (1998), 대한결핵협회
  43. 박윤재, "조선총독부의 결핵 인식과 대책", 한국근현대사연구, (47), pp.216~234 (2008), 한국근현대사학회
  44. 한응수, "한국의 결핵" (1954), 中央結核院
  45. 青木純一, "結核の社会史: 国民病対策の組織化と結核患者の実像を追って" (2004), 御茶の水書房
  46. Bryder, Linda, "Below the Magic Mountain: A Social History of Tuberculosis in Twentieth-Century Britain" (1988), Clarendon
  47. Johnston, William, "The Modern Epidemic: A History of Tuberculosis in Japan" (1995), Harvard University Press
  48. Leavitt, Judith Walzer, "‘Typhoid Mary’ Strikes Back Bacteriological Theory and Practice in Early Twentieth-Century Public Health", Isis, 83(4) (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)