Development of the Scientific Inquiry Process ased on Scientists' Practical Work
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a scientific inquiry model that makes scientific inquiry accessible to science teachers as well as students. To develop a scientific inquiry model, we investigated the research process demonstrated by ten scientists who were working at academic research institutions or industrial research institutions. We collected data through scientists' journal articles, lab meetings and seminars, and observation of their inquiry process. After we analyzed the scientists' inquiry strategies and processes of inquiry, we finally developed the Scientist's Methodology of Investigation Process model named SMIP. The SMIP model consists of four domains, 15 stages, and link questions, such as “if, why”, and “how”. The SMIP model stressed that inquiry process is a selective process rather than a linear or a circular process. Overall, these findings can have implication science educators in their attempt to design instruction to improve the scientific inquiry process.
참고문헌 (59)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Science for all Americans: Project 2061", ~ (1989)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for science literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Bauer, H., "Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method" (1992), University of Illinois Press
- Brown, A. L., "Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedure, principles, and systems, In Innovations in learning: New environments for education", pp.289~325 (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc
- Bruce, B. C., "Using the web to support inquiry-based literacy development", Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(8), pp.706~714 (2002)
- Bruner, J., "The act of discovery", Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), pp.21~ (1961)
- Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers, "A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools", School Science and Mathematics, 7, pp.241~247 (1907)
- Chalmers, A. F., "What is this thing called science?" (1982), University of Queensland Press
- A sample dialogue based on a theory of inquiry teaching, "Collins, A.", Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc. ED 266-423, ~, pp.Tech. Rep. No. 367 (1986)
- Colburn, A., "An inquiry primer", Science Scope, 23, pp.139~140 (2000)
- DeBoer, G. E., "A history of ideas in science education" (1991), Teachers College Press
- Dunbar, K., "How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories, In Mechanisms of insight", pp.365~395 (1995), MIT press
- Dunbar, K., "The invivo", invitro approach to cognition : The case of analogy, 2001, pp.5, 334~339
- Finley, F. N., "Considering the scientific method of inquiry, In Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science" (2000), American Association for the Advancement of Science
- Gilmer, P. J., "Action experiments: Are students learning physical science?, In Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter", pp.199~211 (1998), Falmer Press
- Gooding, D., "The procedural turn, In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol.15: Cognitive models of science" (1992), University of Minnesota Press
- Grandy, R., "Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference", Science & Education, 16(2), pp.141~166 (2007)
- Harwood, W. S., "An activity models for scientific inquiry", The Science Teacher, 71(1), pp.44~46 (2004)
- Harwood, W. S., "A new model for inquiry: Is the scientific method dead?", Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(7), pp.29~33 (2004)
- Harwood, W. S., "Putting the puzzle together : Scientists' metaphors for scientific inquiry", Science Educator, 14(1), pp.25~30 (2005)
- Haury, D. L., "Teaching science through inquiry", ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathmatics and Environmental Education. ED 359 048, ~ (1993)
- Holmes, L., "Lavoisier and the chemistry of life: An exploration of scientific creativity" (1985), University of Wisconsin Press
- Kimball, M. E., "Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, pp.110~120 (1968)
- Kerlinger, F. N., "Foundations of behavioral research" (1970), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Klopfer, L. E., "The teaching of science and the history of science", Journal of Research for Science Teaching, 6, pp.87~95 (1969)
- Krajcik, J., "Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students", The Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3&4), pp.313~350 (1998)
- Lederman, N. G., "Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science : A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.331~359 (1992)
- Lederman, N. G., "The state of science education : Subject matter without context", Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), pp.1~11 (1998)
- Linn, M. C., "The computer as learning partner: Can computer tools teach science, In This year in school science, 1991: Technology for Teaching and Learning", pp.31~69 (1992)
- Linn, M. C., "Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education?", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, pp.7~15 (1994)
- Loucks-Horsely, S, "Reforming teaching and reforming staff development", Journal of Staff Development, 18, pp.20~22 (1997)
- Lunetta, V. N., "The role of the laboratory in school science, In International Handbook of Science Education" (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Martin-Hansen, L., "Defining inquiry", The Science Teacher, 69, pp.34~37 (2002)
- McComas, W. F., "Ten myths of science : Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science", School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), pp.10~15 (1996)
- Metz, K. E., "Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's sciences instruction", Review of Educational Research, 65, pp.93~128 (1995)
- National Research Council., "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- National Science Teachers Association, "Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. (An NSTA position statement)" (1982), National Science Teachers Association
- National Society for the Study of Education, "Science education in American schools: Forty sixth yearbook of the NSSE" (1947), University of Chicago Press
- Nersessian, N. J., "How do the scientist think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science, In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 15: Cognitive models of science" (1992), University of Minnesota Press
- Nersessian, N. J., "Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics", Science & Education, 4, pp.203~226 (1995)
- Novak, A., "Scientific inquiry", Bioscience, 14, pp.25~28 (1964)
- Rakow, S. J., "Teaching science as inquiry. Fastback 246", Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. ED 275 506, ~ (1986)
- Reiff, R., "A scientific method based upon research scientists' conception of scientific inquiry", Paper presented at the AETS (2002)
- Robinson, W. R., "The inquiry wheel, an alternative to the scientific method", Journal of Chemical Education, 81(6), pp.791~792 (2004)
- Roth, W. M., "Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories" (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Roth, W. M., "Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment : interactions of context, content, and student responses", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), pp.709~736 (1996)
- Roth, W. M., "How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, pp.25~48 (1998)
- Scardamalia, M., "Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children", Cognition & Instruction, 9, pp.177~199 (1992)
- Schank, R. C., "The design of goal based scenarios", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, pp.305~345 (1994)
- Schwab, J., "The teaching of science as inquiry: In The teaching of science", pp.1~103 (1962), Cambridge, MA
- Shwartz, Y., "The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of chemical literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), pp.323~344 (2005)
- Sorenson-Johnson, K., "Connecting components of scientific inquiry and instructional strategies for teaching students in urban classrooms: A Literature Review", pp.1~ (2001), NOVAtions
- Spiegel, S. A., "Understanding science teacher enhancement programs: Essential components and a model", Unpublished Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI, ~ (1997)
- Taylor, C., "Some educational implications of creativity research findings", School Science and Mathematics, 62, pp.593~606 (1962)
- Tweney, R. D., "Faraday's discovery of induction: A cognitive approach, In Faraday rediscovered" (1985), Stockton Press
- Variano, E., "Inquiry in limnology lessons", The Science Teacher, 73(5), pp.36~39 (2006)
- The Thinker Tools inquiry project: Making scientific inquiry accessible to students and teachers, "White, Y. B.", University of California, School of Education, ~, pp.Causal models research group report No. 95-02 (1995)
- White, Y. B., "Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition : Making science accessible to all students", Cognition & Instruction, 16(1), pp.3~118 (1998)
- White, B., "Inquiry Island: affordances of a multi-agent environment for scientific inquiry and reflective learning", Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) (2002)
