본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Teaching Models for Scientific Inquiry Activity through the Nature of Science (NOS)

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This article arose from the previous studies, which suggested a synthetic list for the nature of science (NOS), discussed the relationship between the NOS and scientific inquiry and the development of the NOS in the context of scientific inquiry. In this article, for teaching scientific inquiry through the NOS, I proposed three teaching models - reflection, interaction, and the direct model -. Within these teaching models, understanding the NOS is viewed as a prerequisite condition for the improved performance of scientific inquiry. In the reflection model, the NOS is embedded and reflected in scientific inquiry without explicit introduction or direct explanation of the NOS. In the interaction model, concrete interaction between scientific inquiry and the NOS is encouraged during the process of scientific inquiry. In the direct model, subsequent to directly comprehending the NOS at the first stage of activity, students conduct scientific inquiry based on their understanding of the NOS. The intention of this present article is to facilitate the use of these models to develop teaching materials for more authentic scientific inquiry.

Abstract

This article arose from the previous studies, which suggested a synthetic list for the nature of science (NOS), discussed the relationship between the NOS and scientific inquiry and the development of the NOS in the context of scientific inquiry. In this article, for teaching scientific inquiry through the NOS, I proposed three teaching models - reflection, interaction, and the direct model -. Within these teaching models, understanding the NOS is viewed as a prerequisite condition for the improved performance of scientific inquiry. In the reflection model, the NOS is embedded and reflected in scientific inquiry without explicit introduction or direct explanation of the NOS. In the interaction model, concrete interaction between scientific inquiry and the NOS is encouraged during the process of scientific inquiry. In the direct model, subsequent to directly comprehending the NOS at the first stage of activity, students conduct scientific inquiry based on their understanding of the NOS. The intention of this present article is to facilitate the use of these models to develop teaching materials for more authentic scientific inquiry.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. American Association for the Advancement, "Project 2061: Science for All Americans" (1994), Oxford University Press
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature", International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.665~701 (2000)
  3. Akerson, V.L., "One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’retention of improved views of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), pp.194~213 (2006)
  4. Bell, P., "Beliefs about science: how does science instruction contribute", pp.321~ (2002), London
  5. Bel,l R., "Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues", Science Education, 87, pp.352~377 (2003)
  6. Bianchini, J., "Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), pp.177~209 (2000)
  7. Carey, S., "An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students’x understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge [Special issue", International Journal of Science Education, 11, pp.514~529 (1989)
  8. Cartier, J.L., "Teaching the nature of inquiry: Further developments in high school genetics curriculum", Science and Education, 9, pp.247~267 (2000)
  9. Chinn, C.A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating in inquiry tasks", Science Education, 86, pp.175~218 (2002)
  10. Donnelly, J., "Contested terrain or unified project? ‘he nature of science’in the National Curriculum for England and Wales", International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), pp.181~195 (2001)
  11. Hand, B., "A writing in science framework designed to improve science literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 10, pp.1021~1036 (1999)
  12. Hempel, C.G., "Aspects of Scientific Explanation" (1965), The Free Press
  13. Hodson, D., "Is this really what scientists do", pp.93~ (1998), Routledge
  14. Jensen, F., "Learning by designing: A case of heuristic theory development in science teaching", pp.151~ (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  15. Julie Gess-Newsome, "The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course", Science & Education, 11, pp.56~67 (2002)
  16. Lederman, N.G., "The state of science education: subject matter without context", Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2) (1998), http:
  17. Lederman, N.G., "Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science", pp.83~ (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  18. Lederman, N.G., "Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, pp.916~929 (1999)
  19. Lederman, N.G., "Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’conceptions of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, pp.497~521 (2002)
  20. Matthews, M.R., "Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science" (1994), Routledge
  21. Matthews, M.R., "In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, pp.167~174 (1998)
  22. McComas, W.F., "The nature of science in international science education standards documents", pp.41~ (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  23. "Inquiry and the national science education standards. In: http:", openbook.php?record_id=9596 &page=1. Cited 10 January 2008, 2000[DOI]
  24. "NSTA position statement: The nature of science. In: http:", about, pp.positions, natureo fscience.aspx. Cited 10 january 2008
  25. Jongwon Park, "A Study of New Models for Scientific Inquiry Activity Understanding the Nature of Science (NOS): posal for a Synthetic View of the NOS -", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(2), pp.153~167 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
  26. 박종원, "Discussions for linking the Nature of Science (NOS) with Scientific Inquiry", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(7), pp.749~758 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
  27. Development of comprehensive learning materials for the understanding nature of science in the context of scientific inquiry, "Park, Jongwon", Korea Research Foundation, ~, pp.Report No. KRF-2006- 721-B00029 (2007)
  28. 김두현, "과학의 본성 지도자료 개발과 과학영재를 대상으로 한 시험적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), pp.169~179 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
  29. Park, Jongwon, "Deductive reasoning to promote the change of concept about force and motion", International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), pp.593~610 (2002)
  30. Park, Jongwon, "Classification of students' observational statements in science", pp.139~ (2004), Nova Science Publishers
  31. Park, Jongwon, "Modelling Analysis of Students’Processes of Generating Scientific Explanatory Hypotheses", International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), pp.469~489 (2006)
  32. Ping-Kee Tao, "Eliciting and developing junior secondary students’understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories", International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), pp.147~171 (2003)
  33. Sandoval, W.A., "Understanding students’² practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry", Science Education, 89, pp.634~656 (2005)
  34. Sandoval, W.A., "Explanation- Driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry", Science Education, 88, pp.345~372 (2004)
  35. Schwartz, R.S., "Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry", Science Education, 88, pp.610~645 (2004)
  36. Toth, E.E., "“apping to know” The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry", Science Education, 86, pp.264~286 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)