중국어 중복부사 용법과 학습 오류 분석— ‘ 又 ’ 와 ‘ 再 ’ 의 용법을 중심으로 —
Study on Chinese repetitive adverb and Errors of Korean Learners
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study examined differences in the usages of Chinese repetitive adverbs ‘you( 又 )’ and zai( 再 ) in terms of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. As a result, it was possible to confirm that, in explaining the usages of you and ‘zai’, simplistic explanations such as “These words are used mainly in the past tenses and the future tenses, respectively” led to many errors among learners. Korean-speaking learners of Chinese are taught that, in expressing repetition, ‘zai’ is used in the future tenses and you are used in the past tenses. However, ‘zai’ can be used in the past tenses in the case of hypothetical sentences, and you can be used in the future tenses when accompanied by circular situations or optative verbs. In addition, you and zai differ in the locations of both optative verbs and negative adverbs and in usage when adjectives combine with reduplicated verbs. In addition, there are differences according to combination with zai( 在 ), which indicates resultative complements and progression, and in the aspect markers that are frequently combined. Meanwhile, the present study was able to confirm through both an analysis of learners’ errors and semantic map model analysis that learners’ errors were based on influence from the usage of the word ‘ddo’ in Korean, their mother tongue. Because the Korean word ‘ddo’ has diverged semantically in a manner nearly identical to that of the usage of ‘zai’ in Chinese, Korean-speaking learners of Chinese strongly tended to use ‘zai’ even in situations where you were required. Consequently, in future education, it will be necessary especially to explain in greater depth the usages of ‘you’, which differ from those of repetitive adverbs in Korean.
Abstract
The present study examined differences in the usages of Chinese repetitive adverbs ‘you( 又 )’ and zai( 再 ) in terms of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. As a result, it was possible to confirm that, in explaining the usages of you and ‘zai’, simplistic explanations such as “These words are used mainly in the past tenses and the future tenses, respectively” led to many errors among learners. Korean-speaking learners of Chinese are taught that, in expressing repetition, ‘zai’ is used in the future tenses and you are used in the past tenses. However, ‘zai’ can be used in the past tenses in the case of hypothetical sentences, and you can be used in the future tenses when accompanied by circular situations or optative verbs. In addition, you and zai differ in the locations of both optative verbs and negative adverbs and in usage when adjectives combine with reduplicated verbs. In addition, there are differences according to combination with zai( 在 ), which indicates resultative complements and progression, and in the aspect markers that are frequently combined. Meanwhile, the present study was able to confirm through both an analysis of learners’ errors and semantic map model analysis that learners’ errors were based on influence from the usage of the word ‘ddo’ in Korean, their mother tongue. Because the Korean word ‘ddo’ has diverged semantically in a manner nearly identical to that of the usage of ‘zai’ in Chinese, Korean-speaking learners of Chinese strongly tended to use ‘zai’ even in situations where you were required. Consequently, in future education, it will be necessary especially to explain in greater depth the usages of ‘you’, which differ from those of repetitive adverbs in Korean.
참고문헌 (18)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 박선희, "重复义副词“再”与“다시”的对比分析", 중국언어연구, (52), pp.435~457 (2014), 한국중국언어학회
- 한재균, "由韩国学生“再、又、还”偏误分析论近义副词教学", 한중인문학연구, (39), pp.421~442 (2013), 한중인문학회
- 白文植, "韩汉对照韩国语副词词典" (2010), 世界图书出版公司北京公司
- 陈立民, "释“还、再、又”", 语言研究, (3), pp.26~36 (2008)
- 春范, "谈动词前的“又”、“再”、“重”、“还”", 汉语学习, (2), pp.24~26 (1980)
- 崔健, "韩汉范畴表达对比" (2002), 中国大百科全书出版社
- 崔健, "汉韩语言对比研究" (2010), 北京语言大学出版社
- 独海峰, "汉韩“重复”类副词对比", 硕士, pp.2009
- 高林波, "副词“再”和“又”的多角度分析", 长春大学学报, (6) (2008)
- 郭锐, "以补充义为核心的副词语义地图", 类型学视野下的汉语与民族语言研究学术论坛 (2010), 北京语言大学
- 蒋琪, "“再”与“还”重复义的比较研究", 中国语文, (3), pp.187~191 (1997)
- 姜华华, "“再”、“还”、“又”重复义的比较研究", 中山大学研究生学刊, (4) (2002)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2006), 商务印书馆
- 杨佳璐, "副词“又”与“再”语义功能对比分析", 语文学刊, (7) (2013)
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所, "现代汉语词典" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 中國社會科學院語言硏究所, "新華字典" (1998), 商务印书馆
- Corder. S. P., "Error analysis and Interlanguage" (1985), Oxford University Press
