논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용
The Implementation of Argumentation Using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science
0
조회
0
다운로드
115
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) teaching strategy on cognitive levels, science concept understanding, argumentation and writing skills. 131 students attending to co-ed middle school were selected for the study and assigned to the experimental and comparative group. The teaching strategy using SWH was applied to the experimental group, while the traditional one led by teacher's lecturing was applied to the comparative group. The cognitive level test (SRT II) and baseline test were administered before the instruction period. The summary writing test and SRT II test were administered after instruction. The results showed that there was a significant difference between two groups in cognitive levels and science concept understanding, whole argumentation and writing skills. However, there was no significant difference in some argumentation components, including warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal, metacongnitive question. The results of this study showed the possibility of implementation of SWH in science classroom teaching.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) teaching strategy on cognitive levels, science concept understanding, argumentation and writing skills. 131 students attending to co-ed middle school were selected for the study and assigned to the experimental and comparative group. The teaching strategy using SWH was applied to the experimental group, while the traditional one led by teacher's lecturing was applied to the comparative group. The cognitive level test (SRT II) and baseline test were administered before the instruction period. The summary writing test and SRT II test were administered after instruction. The results showed that there was a significant difference between two groups in cognitive levels and science concept understanding, whole argumentation and writing skills. However, there was no significant difference in some argumentation components, including warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal, metacongnitive question. The results of this study showed the possibility of implementation of SWH in science classroom teaching.
참고문헌 (44)
- 강석진, "토론 과정에서 사회적 합의를 강조한 개념 학습 전략의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), pp.250~261 (2000)
- 강순민, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특성", 박사, pp.2004
- 남정희, "논의과정을 강조한 교수?학습 전략이 중학생들의 인지발달, 과학개념 이해, 과학관련 태도 및 논의과정에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.450~461 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 강훈식, "물질의 입자적 성질에 대한 다중 표상 학습에서 외적 표상들 간의 연계와 통합을 촉진시키는 방안으로서의 그리기와 쓰기", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), pp.533~540 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 강훈식, "다중 표상 학습에 적용한 그리기와 쓰기에서시각적 정보의 형태에 따른 교수 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.367~375 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 남경운, "과학일기쓰기가 과학영재의 과학에 관련된 정의적 특성에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1272~1282 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 민병곤, "논증적 텍스트의 생산과정에서 논증 도식의 운용 양상에 대한 분석 및 교육적 시사", 국어교육학연구, 18, pp.183~222 (2003), 국어교육학회
- 박영목, "국어과 교수학습 방법 탐구" (2001), 교육과학사
- 강성주, "문제해결형 탐구 모듈 적용에서의 SWH 활용 효과에 대한 학생들의 인식 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), pp.537~545 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 이주철, "논쟁토론 학습을 적용한 주장하는 글쓰기 지도 방안 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 임재영, "토론식 쓰기 수업 모형-논술 교육을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2001
- 정혁, "빛을 주제로 한 11학년 학생의과제 유형에 따른 글쓰기 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.1008~1017 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- Akkus. R., "Comparing an inquiry-based approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are there differences?", International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), pp.1745~1765 (2007)
- Alvermann, D. E., "The discussion web: A graphic aid for learning across the curriculum", Reading Teacher, 45(2), pp.92~99 (1991)
- Burke, K., "Training chemistry teaching assistants to use the science writing heuristic", Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), pp.36~41 (2005)
- Burke, K. A., "Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory", Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), pp.1032~1038 (2006)
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Duschl, R., "Conceptual change in science and in the learning of science. In: International handbook of science education", pp.1047~1065 (1998), Kluwer
- Duschl, R., "Middle school students dialogic argumentation" (1999), Paper presented at the Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA)
- Argumentation processes in learning science, "Duschl, R.", Paper presented at the International Conference Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistics and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction, Victoria, ~ (2002)
- Emig, J., "Writing as a mode of learning", College Composition and Communication, 28, pp.122~128 (1977)
- Flower L. S., "Identifying the organization of writing processes, In: Cognitive processes in writing", pp.4~30 (1980), Erlbaum
- Grimberg, B. I., "The impact of a scientific writing approach in high school students' learning", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (2003)
- Haack, S., "Defending science-within reason: Between scientism and cynicism" (2003), Prometheus Books
- Hand, B., "When Science and Literacy Meet in the Secondary Learning Space: Implementing the Science Writing Heuristic(SWH)" (2006), University of Iowa
- Hand, B., "A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), pp.1021~1035 (1999)
- Hohenshell, L. M., "Writing-to-learn Strategies in Secondary School Cell Biology: A mixed method study", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), pp.261~289 (2006)
- Kelly, G. J., "Rhetorical features of student science writing in introductory university oceanography", Paper presented at the International Conference Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistics and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction (2002)
- Keys, C. W., "Using the science writing heuristic as a Tool for learning from Laboratory Investigation in Secondary Science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), pp.1065~1084 (1999)
- Kuhn, D., "Thinking as argument", Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), pp.155~178 (1992)
- Kuhn, D., "Effects of dyadic interaction on reasoning", Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), pp.287~315 (1997)
- Langer, J., "How Writing Shapes thinking: A Study of Teaching and Learning" (1987), National Council of Teachers of English
- Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning, and values" (1990), Ablex
- Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), pp.553~576 (1999)
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", School Science Review, 82(301), pp.63~70 (2001)
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2004)
- Piaget, J., "The Child's Construction of Quantities" (1974), Routledge and Kegan Paul
- Prain, V., "Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices", Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), pp.609~626 (1996)
- Santa, C. M., "Learning through writing. In: Science Learning: Process and Applications", pp.122~133 (1991), International Reading Association
- Traweek, S., "Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists" (1988), Harvard University Press
- Toulmin, S., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Wallace, C., "Acquiring the social language of science: Building science language identities through inquiry-based investigations", Paper presented at the International Conference Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistics and Pedagogical Considerations of Language Brian Hand and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction (2002)
- Wylam, H., "CSMS science reasoning tasks" (1980), NFER Publishing Co
- Yore, L. D., "Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.689~725 (2003)
