본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

서술형 평가에서의 교사평가와 동료평가 활동 경험에 따른 고등학생들의 인식

High School Students' Perceptions on Descriptive Assessment Activity Experiences by Teacher or by Peer

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

이 연구에서는 서술형 문항에 대한 교사평가와 동료평가가 고등학생들의 학업성취도와 정의적 영역에 미치는 효과를 알아보고, 평가에 대한 학생들의 만족도와 신뢰도를 분석하여 시사점을 얻고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 중소도시에 있는 고등학교 2학년 2개반을 선정하여 학업성취도, 정의적 영역의 검사를 사전과 사후에 실시하였다. 서술형 문항의 평가는 10차시 수업 동안 진행되었으며, 교사평가를 실시한 반에서는 학생들이 서술형 문항을 푼 후에 교사가 이에 대한 피드백을 수업 중에 실시하였다. 동료평가를 실시한 반에서는 학생들이 서술형 문항을 푼 후에 소집단 별로 동료평가를 실시하고 피드백을 제공하도록 하였다. 연구 결과, 학업성취도 상위 집단 학생들은 상대적으로 교사평가에 긍정적인 만족도를 나타내었고, 하위 집단 학생들은 동료평가에 긍정적인 만족도를 나타내었다. 한편, 학업성취도 상위 집단 학생들은 교사평가와 학생평가에서 동일한 채점 기준을 제공하였음에도 불구하고 교사평가에 대한 신뢰도가 상대적으로 높은 반면, 하위 집단 학생들은 교사평가에 대한 신뢰도가 상대적으로 낮았다. 학업성취도가 하위인 학생들만 비교한 결과 교사평가를 실시한 학급보다 동료평가를 실시한 학급에서 성취도의 향상이 통계적으로 유의미하게 나타났다. 정의적 영역의 평가 결과에서도 하위 집단 학생들은 동료 평가가 정의적 영역에서 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 특별히 과학에 대한 인식 영역에서 변화가 통계적으로 유의미하게 나타났다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to figure out the influence on the students' achievement of the cognitive and the affective domains by descriptive items assessment of teacher or peer and to obtain implications by analyzing the students' satisfaction and the reliability of the assessment. For this purpose, two classes of 11th grade students located in a small city were selected and took an exam related to the cognitive and the affective domains before and after the assessment. The assessment activities were carried out during 10 lessons and the teacher gave feedback to the students of the teacher assessment class in the lessons. In the peer assessment class, a small-size student group discussion and feedback were given to the students after the exam. The results show that higher level achievement group students represented relatively positive satisfaction on teacher assessment, and lower level achievement group students represented positive satisfaction on peer assessment. In spite of the same marker list, higher level achievement group students represent relatively high reliability than lower level achievement group students. The lower level achievement group students in the peer assessment class got statistically meaningful improvement of achievement than the students of teacher assessment class. The peer assessment activity was positively influenced on the affective domain of the lower level achievement group students, especially signigicant meaning of statistics was found on the students' perception about science.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Alexopoulou, E., "Small-group discussion in physics : Peer interaction modes in peers and fours", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), pp.1099~1114 (1996)
  2. Ballantyne, R., "Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), pp.427~441 (2002)
  3. Back, S. K., "The principle of descriptive evaluation" (2000), Education Science Company
  4. Blom, D., "Peer assessment of tertiary music performance", British Journal of Music Education, 21(2), pp.111~125 (2004)
  5. 채수진, "의과대학 문제중심학습에서 학생평가방법의 일관성 검토 : 튜터평가, 동료평가, 자기평가를 중심으로", 열린교육연구, 14(1), pp.331~349 (2006), 한국열린교육학회
  6. Cho, H. M., "A theoretical exploration of peer evaluation in the perspective of social constructivism", The Journal of Education, 23, pp.229~254 (2004)
  7. Defina, A. A., "PortFolio assessment. Getting started" (1992), Scholastic Professional Books
  8. Falchikov, N., "Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, pp.146~166 (1986)
  9. Farr, R., "Portfolio and performance assessment" (1994), Arlex publishing
  10. Fry, S., "Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15, pp.177~189 (1990)
  11. Green, M., "Responsive evaluation", pp.83~103 (1994), Heinemann
  12. Ha, B., "Development of practical instrument for the measurement of science process skills of elementary school students", Journal of Research in Science & Mathematic education, 26, pp.33~72 (2000)
  13. Hahn, A. J., "New elementary science teaching method" (1997), Education science company
  14. 한정선, "동료평가가 온라인 토론 양상에 미치는 변화 연구", 교육공학연구, 24(1), pp.87~107 (2008), 한국교육공학회
  15. Hong, M., "The development of assessment items with assay & description type test science in biology for high school students", Journal of Science Education Kyungpook National University, 30, pp.65~100 (2006)
  16. "The logic and computational details of the Mann-Whitney test. chapter 11a. Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics. provided by the Department of Mathematics &Statistics at the University of Saskatchewan: ©Richard Lowry 2001-2014"[URL]
  17. Hwang, J., "An assessement of high school students' performance on science process skills in biology", Research for Subject Matter Education, 14(1), pp.67~84 (2010)
  18. 강경희, "발표 활동에서 예비 과학교사들의 동료평가에 관한 결과와 인식 분석", 교원교육, 25(3), pp.261~275 (2009), 교육연구원
  19. Kang, H., "Elemenatary science education theory" (2010), Education Science Company
  20. 김민정, "학습 방법으로서의 동료평가 : 평가자 및 피평가자의 역할이 학습자의 초인지, 학업성취, 학습동기에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 21(4), pp.1~28 (2005), 한국교육공학회
  21. Kim, H. N., "National science evaluation system development of affective characteristics" (1998), Science Education Institute of Korea National University of Education
  22. Kim, J. H., "Descriptive evaluation ROAD VIEW" (2010), ParkLeeJung Publisher
  23. 김광용, "2009개정교육과정에 따른 중학교 정보과목의 서술형 수행평가 적용방안", 교원교육, 29(4), pp.187~203 (2013), 교육연구원[DOI]
  24. Kim, S., "Developing descriptive essay problems in mathematics for high school students", Journal of Science Education Kyungpook National University, 30, pp.1~22 (2006)
  25. 김유향, "과학 탐구 사고력 측정을 위한 서술형 평가 도구 개발", 생물교육, 40(1), pp.167~177 (2012), 한국생물교육학회
  26. Kyungkido Education Office, "Guidebook of descriptive & Essay evaluation. North government office building, Support section of teaching and learning" (2012)
  27. Lee, J., "Descriptive evaluation ROAD VIEW-Science" (2011), ParkLeeJung Publisher
  28. Orsmond, P., "The importance of marking criteria in peer and self-assessment", Assesment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp.239~249 (1996)
  29. Park, D. S., "Evaluation of education" (2008), Education Science Company
  30. Reinforcing method of descriptive and assay assessment for students' improvement of scholastic ability in Seoul, "Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education", ~, pp.Report paper 2007 (2010)
  31. Song, H. M., "The analysis of the effect of peer evaluation and the verbal interaction in small groups in solving descriptive questions of metabolism", Doctor, pp.2006
  32. Topping, K., "Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), pp.149~169 (1998)
  33. Yang, G. S., "Descriptive and essay assessment source book" (2006), Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education
  34. Watson, S. B., "Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative learning groups in a college life science course", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), pp.291~299 (1995)
  35. Webb, N. M., "Group Composition, Group Interaction, and Achievement in small groups", Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), pp.475~484 (1982)
  36. Wen, M. L., "University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward online peer assessment", Higher Education, 51, pp.27~44 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)