논의 기반 탐구 과학수업에서 동료평가 활동이 고등학생의 논의에 미치는 영향
Impact of Peer Assessment Activities on High School Student’s Argumentation in Argument-Based Inquiry
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구에서는, 과학적 논의에서 학생들의 참여를 향상시킬 수 있는방법으로 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업에 동료평가 활동을 적용하였으며, 글쓰기에서 나타나는 학생들의 논의를 분석하여 프로그램의 효과를알아보았다. 이 연구는 광역시의 과학중점고등학교 학생들을 대상으로 1학년두 학급(58명)을 실험집단으로, 다른 두 학급(58명)을 비교집단으로선정하여 총 5개의 주제를 적용하였다. 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업의전략을 바탕으로 동료평가를 적용한 수업 프로그램을 개발하고, 학생들에게 프로그램을 적용한 후, 학생들의 글쓰기에서 나타나는 ‘Big idea’, ‘과학 개념’, ‘논의’, ‘수사적 구조’ 항목을 비교하였다. 실험집단학생들은 동료평가 활동을 적용한 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업을 처치하였으며, 비교집단 학생들은 동료평가 활동을 적용하지 않은 논의 기반탐구 과학수업을 처치하였다. 사전과 사후 요약 글쓰기 검사(Summary Writing Test)에서 나타난 ‘Big idea’, ‘과학 개념’, ‘논의’, ‘수사적 구조’의 평균을 공변량 분석으로 비교한 결과, 논의 항목의 평균이 비교집단에 비해 실험집단이 통계적으로 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. ‘논의’ 항목의 세부 요소에 대한 평균에서 증거와 보장/보강요소가비교집단에 비해 실험집단에서 통계적으로 유의미하게 높았다. 이러한 결과로부터 동료평가 활동을 적용한 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업은논의 능력의 발달에 있어서 기존의 논의 기반 탐구 과학수업 비해더 효과적임을 알 수 있었다. 동료평가 활동을 통해 지속적인 피드백을받는 것이 논의와 글쓰기를 수행하는 학생들의 논의능력향상에 도움이 될 것으로 보이며, 동료평가 활동이 학생 논의의 스캐폴딩 도구로써활용 가능성이 있다고 볼 수 있다.
Abstract
This study focused on the use of peer assessment activities to investigate its the impact on students' argumentation skills in argument-based inquiry. The participants of the study were 106 10th grade students (four classes). Two classes were assigned to the experimental group, and the other two classes were assigned to the comparative group. The experimental group was taught argument-based inquiry through the application of peer assessment activities. The comparative group was taught argument-based inquiry without peer assessments. At the claim and evidence stage, students were asked to evaluate whether peers’ claims fit with the evidence and whether peers’ explanation of the evidences validity was sufficient. The quality of argumentation used in the students' writing was different in each group. According to the analysis of the summary writing test, the results showed that the experimental group had a significantly higher mean score than the comparative group in argumentation components, including evidence and warrant/backing. In addition, the experimental group used better multimodal representation including explanation of evidence than the comparative group. The findings showed that argument-based inquiry applying peer assessment activities had an effect on the argumentation skills in students' writing.
참고문헌 (51)
- Alexopoulou, E., "Small-Group Discussion in Physics : Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), pp.1099~1114 (1996)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science., "Benchmarks for science literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Berland, L., "In pursuit of consensus : Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation", International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), pp.1857~1882 (2012)
- Boud, D., "Rethinking assessment in higher education" (2007), Kogan Page
- 조혜숙, "중학교 과학수업에 적용한 글쓰기를 활용한 논의-기반 모델링 전략의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(6), pp.583~592 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Clark, D., "Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education : Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions", Science Education, 92(3), pp.447~472 (2008)
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~313 (2000)
- Duschl, R., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38, pp.39~72 (2002)
- Duschl, R., "Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8" (2007), National Academies Press
- Erduran, S., "Argumentation in science education : an overview", Argumentation in Science Education, 35, pp.3~27 (2007)
- Fulwiler, B., "Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning" (2008), Heinemann
- Hand, B., "Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments", annual international conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (2008)
- Hand, B., "Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on Year 10 biology students’ understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts", Instructional Science, 35, pp.343~373 (2007)
- Hsi, S., "Productive Discussion in Science : Gender Equity Through Electronic Discourse", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), pp.23~36 (1997)
- 장경화, "학생들의 글쓰기에 나타난 논의구조에 미치는 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동의 효과 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(7), pp.1099~1108 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., ""Doing the lesson"or"doing science" : Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
- Kelly, G., "The sound of music : Constructing science as a sociocultural practice through oral and written discourse", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), pp.883~915 (1999)
- Kelly, G., "Epistemic levels in argument : an analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing", Science Education, 86(3), pp.314~342 (2002)
- Kelly, G., "Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation", Argumentation in science education, 35, pp.137~157 (2007)
- Keys, C., "Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), pp.1065~1084 (1999)
- Kiuhara, S., "Teaching writing to high school students : A national survey", Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), pp.136~160 (2009)
- Kollar, I., "Peer assessment as collaborative learning : a cognitive perspective", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.344~348 (2012)
- Kuhn, L., "Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2006)
- Kulatunga, U., "Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), pp.1207~1231 (2013)
- 권정인, "논의기반 탐구 과학 글쓰기 수업 적용에서 나타나는 초임 과학 교사들의 수업에 대한 인식 및 수업실행 변화", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), pp.1329~1342 (2013), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Larson, A., "Improving students' evaluation of informal arguments", Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), pp.339~366 (2009)
- Li, L., "Assessor or assessee : How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback", British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), pp.525~536 (2010)
- Liu, E., "Web-based peer review : The learner as both adapter and reviewer", IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), pp.246~251 (2001)
- 남정희, "논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 예비교사의 글쓰기 능력 및 화학개념 이해에 미치는 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), pp.1077~1091 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
- 남정희, "논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), pp.922~936 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 남정희, "논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 대학생들의 글쓰기에서 나타난 다중 표상 및 다중 표상의 내재성에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(6), pp.931~941 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
- National Research Council, "Inquiry and the national science education standards" (2000), National Academy Press
- National Research Council, "Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8" (2007), National Academy Press
- National Research Council., "A framework for K-12 science education:Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
- National Research Council, "The next generation science standards" (2013), National Academy Press
- Osborne, J., "Science without literacy:Aship without a sail?", Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, pp.203~215 (2002)
- Osborne, J., "Science education in Europe" (2008), Nuffield Foundation
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Phillips, L., "Interpreting popular reports of science : What happens when the readers' world meets the world on paper?", International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), pp.317~327 (1999)
- Poock, J., "Using the science writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students academic performance", Journal of Chemical Education, 84, pp.1371~1378 (2007)
- Prain, V., "Writing for learning in secondary science : Rethinking practices", Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), pp.179~201 (1996)
- Purchase, H., "Learning about interface design through peer assessment", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), pp.341~352 (2000)
- Rust, C., "Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), pp.147~164 (2003)
- Sampson, V., "Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory : Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas", Science Education, 97(5), pp.643~670 (2013)
- Sandoval, W., "Explanation driven inquiry : Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry", Science Education, 88(3), pp.345~372 (2004)
- Smyth, K., "The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), pp.369~378 (2004)
- Spiller, D., "Assessment matters: Self assessment and peer assessment" (2009), University of Waikato
- Tavares, M., "Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems", Science & Education, 19(6-8), pp.573~598 (2010)
- Toulmin, S., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Xiao, Y., "The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment", The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), pp.186~193 (2008)
- Yore, L., "Examining the literacy component of science literacy : 25 years of language arts and science research", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.689~725 (2003)