본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발

Designing Collective Intelligence-based Instructional Models for Teaching Socioscientific Issues

최윤희|이현주|고연주
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2014.09|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제34권 제6호|pp. 523-534|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0523

1

조회

0

다운로드

31

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

집단지성교수학습모형instructional modelsocioscientific issuescollective intelligence과학관련 사회쟁점SSI 교수SSI teaching
주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구에서는 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점(SSI)과 집단지성과의 연관성을 고려하여, 집단지성 촉진 전략을 활용한 SSI 수업모형(CI기반 SSI 수업모형)을 현장 과학교사들과 협력적으로 개발하였다. 그리고, 수업모형 개발과정에서 참여 교사들이 SSI 수업에서 집단지성의 효과에 대해 어떻게 인식하는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 CI기반 SSI 수업모형은 SSI 수업에서 교사들이 추구하는 목적에 따라 크게 3개의 유형(발산적 모형, 탐색적 모형, 의사결정 모형)으로 나뉘며, 각 유형 당 2개씩 총 6개가 개발되었다. 첫째, 발산적 모형은 학생들이 주어진 SSI에 대한 의견이나 해결방안을 다양하게 발산해보도록 하는데 초점을 둔 수업모형으로, 아이디어 생성 수업모형과 미래 상황 예측 수업모형이 해당된다. 둘째, 탐색적 모형은 문제를 둘러싸고 있는 다양한 입장들에 대해 탐색하여 SSI의 복잡성을 이해하는 데 초점을 둔 수업모형으로, 쟁점 탐색 수업모형과 실제 사례 탐색 수업모형이 이 유형에 속한다. 셋째, 의사결정 모형은 주어진 SSI에 대해 다양한 입장을 이해하고 가장 합리적으로 집단의 의사결정을 하도록 의견을 수렴하고 조정하는데 초점을 둔 수업모형으로, 집단적 합의 수업모형과 대안 결정 수업모형이 해당된다. 참여교사들은 각 수업모형을 적용해본 결과 SSI 수업에서 집단지성의 원리를 강조한 것이 학생들의 참여도와 협력, 토론과 근거의 질을 높이는 데 기여했다고 보았다. 이를 위해서는 SSI 수업 도입 부분에서 문제해결을 위해 공유된 가치를 형성하는 과정, 개별적으로 자료를 수집할 수 있는 시간을 충분히 갖고 난 후 공유하는 과정, 개인적으로 자료를 수집하여 정리하고 공유할 수 있는 공간의 마련이 중요하다고 응답하였다.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop collective intelligence (CI) based instructional models for teaching socioscientific issues on the basis of intimate collaboration with science teachers, and to investigate the participating teachers' perceptions on the effectiveness of the instructional models. Adapting the ADDIE model, we suggested three types of SSI instructional models (i.e. generative model, exploratory model, and decision-making model). Generative models emphasized the process of brainstorming ideas or possible solutions for SSI. Exploratory models focused on providing students opportunities to explore various SSI cases and diverse perspectives to understand its controversial nature and complexity. Decision-making models encouraged students to negotiate or develop a group-consensus on SSI through the dialogical process. After implementing the instructional models in the science classroom, the teachers reported that CI-based SSI instructional models contributed to encouraging students' active participation and collaboration as well as to improving the quality of their argument or discourses on SSI. They also supported the importance of developing collective consciousness on the issues in the beginning of the SSI class, providing independent time and space for reflecting on their personal values and opinions with scientific evidence, and formulating an atmosphere where they freely exchanged opinions and feedback for constructing better collective ideas.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Aikenhead, G. S., "Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice" (2006), Teachers College Press
  2. Albe, V., "When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect : Students'argumentation in group discussion on a socio-scientific issue", Research in Science Education, 38, pp.67~90 (2008)
  3. Brown, J., "Collective intelligence: Creating a prosperous world at peace", pp.47~54 (2008), Earth Intelligence Network
  4. 장현숙, "College Students’ Decision-Making Tendencies in the Context of Socioscientific Issues (SSI)", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(7), pp.887~900 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  5. Cho, H., "The necessities and current states of educating ethical characteristics of science", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(4), pp.559~570 (1998)
  6. Choi, K., "The teaching", learning procedures and themes for ethical issues in science, 2002, pp.28(4), 408~417
  7. Connell, S., "'If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it' : A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities", Environmental Education Research, 5(1), pp.96~113 (1999)
  8. Cross, R. T., "Science teachers’ social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), pp.319~333 (1996)
  9. Dawson, V. M., "Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics", Research in Science Education, 40, pp.133~148 (2010)
  10. Dori, Y. J., "Teaching biotechnology through case studies: Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?", Science Education, 87(6), pp.767~793 (2003)
  11. Dreyfus, A., "Twelfth-grade biology pupils’ opinions on interventions of man in nature : Agreement, indifference and ambivalence", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), pp.81~95 (1991)
  12. Gan, Y., "A learning framework for knowledge building and collective wisdom advancement in virtual learning communities", Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), pp.206~226 (2007)
  13. Hansen, K. H., "How teachers construe curriculum integration : The Science, Technology, Society(STS)movement as Bildung", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(6), pp.669~682 (1996)
  14. Hogan, K., "Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), pp.341~368 (2002)
  15. Hutchins, E., "How a cockpit remembers its speeds", Cognitive Science, 19, pp.265~288 (1995)
  16. Jeong, E., "Development of a value inquiry model in biology education", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), pp.582~598 (2000)
  17. Leadbeater, C., "We think: Mass innovation, not mass production" (2008), Profile Books
  18. 이현주, "Exploration of Experienced Science Teachers’ Personal Practical Knowledge of Teaching Socioscientific Issues (SSI)", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(3), pp.353~365 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  19. Lee, H., "Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues : Disconnection with reform efforts", International Journal of Science Education, 31, pp.931~960 (2009)
  20. Lee, H., "Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of preservice science teachers' moral reasoning on socioscientific issues", International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), pp.925~953 (2012)
  21. Lee, H., "Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens", International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), pp.2079~2113 (2013)
  22. 이유나, "집단지성의 교육적 적용을 위한 개념모형과 설계 원리", 교육공학연구, 25(4), pp.215~241 (2009), 한국교육공학회
  23. Lévy, P., "L'intelligence Collective: Pour une anthropologie de cyberspace" (1994), La Découverte
  24. Means, M. L., "Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels", Cognition and Instruction, 14, pp.139~178 (1996)
  25. Michaelson, L. K., "Team-based learning:A transformative use of small group" (2002), Greenwood Publishing Group Inc
  26. Millar, R., "Twenty first century science : Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science", International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), pp.1499~1521 (2006)
  27. Ministry of Education Science Technology(MEST), "Korea national curriculum standards(2011-361)", MEST, ~ (2011)
  28. Mueller, M. P., "Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems", pp.105~128 (2010), Springer
  29. P21, , 2009
  30. Paulus, P. B., "Group creativity" (2003), Oxford university press
  31. Perkins, D. N., "Informal reasoning and education", pp.83~105 (1991), Erlbaum
  32. Ratcliffe, M., "Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum", International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), pp.167~182 (1997)
  33. Reis, P., "The impact of socio-scientific controversies in Portuguese natural science teachers’' conceptions and practices", Research in Science Education, 34, pp.153~171 (2004)
  34. Roth, W. M., "Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), pp.9~23 (2003)
  35. Roth, W. M., "Educating for citizenship : Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of Science", Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), pp.149~168 (2004)
  36. Roth, W. M., "Science education as", for participation in the community, 2004, pp.88(2), 263~294
  37. Sadler, T. D., "The morality of socioscientific issues : Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas", Science Education, 88, pp.4~27 (2004)
  38. Sadler, T. D., "Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), pp.112~138 (2005)
  39. Sadler, T. D., "What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?", Research in Science Education, 37, pp.371~391 (2007)
  40. Salomon, G., "International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments", pp.363~378 (1996), L. Erlbaum Associates
  41. Seels, B. B., "Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field" (1994), Association for Educational Communications and Technology
  42. Simonneaux, L., "Role-play or debate to promote students'argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis", International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), pp.903~927 (2001)
  43. Surowiecki, J., "The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations" (2004), Random House
  44. Tal, R. T., "Reasoning, problem-solving and reflections : Participating in WISE project in Israel", Science Education International, 14, pp.3~19 (2003)
  45. Tal, R. T., "Teaching socioscientific issues : Classroom culture and students’ performances", Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), pp.615~644 (2006)
  46. Tapscott, D., "Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything" (2006), Portfolio
  47. Treffinger, D. J., "Four decades of creative vision : Insights from an evaluation of the future problem solving program international(FPSPI)", The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), pp.209~219 (2012)
  48. Tweney, R. D., "Informal reasoning and education", pp.3~16 (1991), Erlbaum
  49. 양미경, "집단지성의 구현을 위한 협력학습의 원리 탐색", 교육방법연구, 23(2), pp.457~483 (2011), 한국교육방법학회
  50. Zeidler, D. L., "It's debatable!: Using socioscientific issues to develop scientific literacy" (2014), NSTA press
  51. Zeidler, D. L., "Socioscientific issues : Theory and practice", Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), pp.49~58 (2009)
  52. Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research based framework for socio-scientific issues education", Science Education, 89(3), pp.357~377 (2005)
  53. Zohar, A., "Fostering student's knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, pp.35~62 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

집단지성을 강조한 과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 수업이 중학교 영재학급 학생들의 역량 함양에 미치는 효과고연주, 이현주, 최윤희한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2015 · 제35권 제3호과학관련 사회적 쟁점 기반 과학 수업 연구의 특징 분석이윤정, 장신호한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2023 · 제42권 제1호과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 수업의 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론에서 나타나는 특징김민환, 김성훈, 남혜인, 노태희한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2018 · 제38권 제2호데이터 리터러시 향상을 위한 AI 융합 SSI(Socioscientific Issue) 수업 모형 및 교수전략 개발전유선한국교육정보미디어학회 · 교육정보미디어연구2024 · 제30권 제6호집단지성을 활용한 예비교사들의 과학지식 형성과정 탐색김성원, 김세미, 김은진한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2013 · 제33권 제5호과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 교육을 위한 교과교육학적 지식(SSI-PCK) 요소에 대한 탐색이현주한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2016 · 제36권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

과학교과에서의 핵심역량에 대한 세계의 동향에 준거하여 우리나라 현장 교사들의 인식 연구정대홍, 고은정pp. 535-547과학과 인문학의 통합개념 선정을 위한 델파이 연구윤회정, 방담이, 김지영, 박지은, 박은미pp. 549-558과학관 학습 실행에서 나타난 과학 교사의 교수 전략 분석한문정, 노태희, 양찬호pp. 559-569언어네트워크분석에 기초한 과학학습의 목적에 대한고등학교 교사와 학생들의 인식박경진, 하민수, 이준기, 정덕호pp. 571-581중학교 과학수업에 적용한 글쓰기를 활용한 논의-기반 모델링 전략의 효과남정희, 조혜숙pp. 583-592
원문 보기