본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생의 과학 탐구 학습 지향과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략의 관계 비교

The Relationship between Orientations toward Scientific Inquiry Learning and Coping Strategies for Anomalous Situations in Elementary Students: A Comparison between General and Science-Gifted Students

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

이 연구에서는 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생의 과학 탐구 학습지향을 조사하여 비교했다. 또한 이들의 과학 탐구 학습 지향과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략의 관련성도 조사하여 비교했다. 이를 위해서울특별시에서 초등 일반 학생 61명과 과학영재 학생 53명을 선정한뒤, 과학 탐구 학습 지향을 조사하는 설문과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처전략을 조사하는 설문을 실시했다. 또한 일부 일반 학생 및 과학영재학생을 대상으로 반구조화된 심층 면담을 개별로 실시했다. 연구 결과, 학년과 관계없이 과학 탐구 학습 지향 중에서 초등 일반 학생은‘개념이해’ 지향이 가장 많이 나타났으며, ‘과학적 실천’ 지향이 두번째로 많이 나타났다. 반면 초등 과학영재 학생은 ‘과학적 실천’ 지향의 빈도가 가장 높았으며, ‘개념이해’와 ‘복합’ 지향도 비교적 자주나타났다. ‘활동’ 지향은 일부 일반 학생에게서만 나타났고, ‘공학적실천’ 지향은 일부 과학영재 학생에게서만 나타났으며, ‘과정기능’ 지향은 나타나지 않았다. 과학 탐구 학습 지향과 불일치 상황에 대한대처 전략 사이에 명확한 관련성을 확인하지는 못했다. 그러나 같은과학 탐구 학습 지향을 가진 경우라도 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략을선택하는 양상은 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생 사이에 약간의 차이가 있음을 발견할 수 있었다. 이에 대한 교육적 시사점을 논의했다.

Abstract

This study investigated and compared orientations toward scientific inquiry learning among general and science-gifted elementary students. It also investigated and compared the relationship between their orientations toward scientific inquiry learning and their coping strategies for anomalous situations. To realize this, 61 general elementary students and 53 science-gifted elementary students in Seoul were selected, and questionnaires were administered to investigate their orientations toward scientific inquiry learning and coping strategies for anomalous situations. In addition, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted individually with some of the general and science-gifted students. The results showed that among orientations toward scientific inquiry learning, regardless of grade level, the general students were most likely to possess ‘concept understanding’ and second most likely to exhibit ‘scientific practice’. On the other hand, the science-gifted students demonstrated the highest frequency of ‘scientific practice’, with ‘concept understanding’ and ‘complexity’ also being relatively common. ‘Activity driven’ was found only among some of the general students and ‘engineering practice’ was found only among some of the science-gifted students. ‘Process skills’ were not found. No clear relationships between orientations toward scientific inquiry learning and coping strategies for anomalous situations were found. However, some differences in the choice of coping strategies for anomalous situations between the general and science-gifted students were discovered, even when they had the same orientations toward scientific inquiry learning. The educational implications of these findings were discussed.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Inquiry in science education : International perspectives", Science Education, 88(3), pp.397~419 (2004)
  2. Ajzen, I., "Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior" (1980), Prentice-Hall
  3. An, J., "Responses of university students confronted with a sustained anomalous situation with a dynamic balance", New Physics : Sae Mulli, 68(1), pp.62~70 (2018)
  4. Aydin, S., "The nature of integration among PCK components : A case study of two experienced chemistry teachers", Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), pp.615~624 (2013)
  5. Aydin, S., "The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum", Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, pp.37~50 (2015)
  6. Betts, G. T., "Fostering autonomous learners through levels of differentiation", Roeper Review, 26(4), pp.190~191 (2004)
  7. Chae, D., "Analyzing inquiry activities and exploring the difficulties of teaching inquiry activities presented in science textbooks for grades 5-6", Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 15(2), pp.213~223 (2022)
  8. Cho, E., "Pre-service elementary teachers’orientation toward scientific inquiry teaching : Focusing on the anomalous situation", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 42(2), pp.211~226 (2023)
  9. Choi, S., "The influences of cognitive conflict and situational interest by a discrepant event on the conceptual change process in learning the concept of combustion", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), pp.779~785 (2008)
  10. Gess-Newsome, J., "Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement", International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), pp.1~20 (2017)
  11. Gul, K, S., "Science teachers’ perceptions toward discrepant events applied in science education", Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), pp.1~11 (2017)
  12. Han, S., "An investigation of elementary school teachers’ epistemological beliefs about science on the bases of their strategies for coping with critical incidents", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(1), pp.61~70 (2011)
  13. Jang, W., "Interpretation of discrepant events through analysis of inquiry activities in textbooks-Focusing on the discussion of the boiling point measurement experiment-", School Science Journal, 15(5), pp.437~452 (2021)
  14. Jegal, M., "Coping strategy and epistemological belief of elementary science gifted students ‘in real science anomalous situations", The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 14(1), pp.73~96 (2015)
  15. Jho, H., "The observation type of primary students and the effect of their views of science on observation activity in anomalous situation", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), pp.405~414 (2011)
  16. Ji, S., "The beginning elementary school teachers’difficulties to suffer in the science classes from the perspective of content knowledge and teaching method", Journal of Science Education, 40(2), pp.116~130 (2016)
  17. Jo, S., "Analyses of elementary science-gifted students’epistemological beliefs about science through use of anomalous situations", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), pp.328~344 (2013)
  18. Jung, S., "Analysis of inquiry activities in the field of life in 5th and 6th grade elementary science authorized textbooks according to the 2015 revised science curriculum", Biology Education, 51(1), pp.66~77 (2023)
  19. Kang, H., "Analyses of elementary school students’epistemological beliefs through investigation of their coping strategy types for anomalous situations in science classes students", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), pp.1087~1098 (2012)
  20. Kang, J., "The relationship between the cognitive conflict levels of students facing an anomalous situation including misconception and a conceptual change in science", New Physics : Sae Mulli, 68(10), pp.1116~1126 (2018)
  21. Kim, D., "Exploring the use of inconsistent situations in science class by the level of problem-solving ability in elementary school teachers", Biology Education, 51(1), pp.22~34 (2023)
  22. Kim, H., "Analysis of elementary science textbook inquiry activities according to the transition to authorized textbooks-Focused on the unit of ‘life cycle of the animal’-", Biology Education, 51(1), pp.1~10 (2023)
  23. Kim, M., "Students’ difficulties to suffer in the classes on"World of small living things"unit of elementary school science", Biology Education, 43(3), pp.240~250 (2015)
  24. Kim, Y., "Exploring elementary teachers’ difficulties on teaching science by analyzing questions in an autonomous online teacher community : Focusing on physics questions in indischool", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(1), pp.73~88 (2019)
  25. Ko, Y., "Exploration on learning experiences for improving science academic passion of elementary science-gifted students", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(2), pp.274~286 (2023)
  26. Kwon, H., "Elementary school teachers’ difficulties in science classes and self-efficacy in science teaching : Narrative inquiry of a teacher in elementary school", Journal of Studies on Schools and Teaching, 4(1), pp.63~82 (2019)
  27. Lee, D., "Improvement of teachers’ scientific knowledge researched by difficulty and development of teachers experienced in process of conducting scientific inquiry", Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 66(1), pp.42~49 (2022)
  28. Lee, E., "Exploring small group argumentation and epistemological framing of gifted science students as revealed by the analysis of their responses to anomalous data", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), pp.419~429 (2015)
  29. Lee, H., "Theoretical review on the meaning and importance of autonomous inquiries for the gifted in science education", Journal of Science Education, 2(2), pp.33~50 (2008)
  30. Lee, J., "Comparing the structure of secondary school students’ perception of the meaning of"Experiment"in science and biology", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), pp.997~1006 (2015)
  31. Lee, S., "Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), pp.97~107 (2007)
  32. Lee, S., "Latest introduction to gifted education" (2019), Hakjisa
  33. Lim, A., "An analysis of teachers and students’ difficulties in the classes on ‘electric circuit’ unit of elementary school science curriculum", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), pp.597~606 (2014)
  34. Lim, S., "Analysis of teaching strategies, types of inquiry activities and the relationship between inquiry activities and concepts presented in elementary school science textbooks-focusing on earth science-", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(3), pp.449~463 (2020)
  35. Lucero, M., "Teachers’ beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools", International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), pp.1407~1423 (2013)
  36. Mason, L., "Intentional conceptual change", pp.199~236 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  37. Science curriculum, "Ministry of Education", MOE, ~, pp.MOE Notification No. 2015-74 (2015)
  38. Science curriculum, "Ministry of Education", MOE, ~, pp.MOE Notification No. 2022-33 (2022)
  39. Nott, M., "Critical incidents in the science classroom and the nature of science", School Science Review, 76(276), pp.41~46 (1995)
  40. Park, J., "Analysis of inquiry skills and core competencies reflected in inquiry activities of authorized elementary school science textbooks", Biology Education, 50(4), pp.496~504 (2022)
  41. Park, J., "Inquiry of the parallel connection of batteries by using PhET Simulation : How can simulation help pre-service elementary teachers to understand anomalous situation?", New Physics : Sae Mulli, 72(5), pp.376~389 (2022)
  42. Park, J., "Why did I cope with so? : A teacher’s strategy to cope with anomalous situations in primary practical science lessons", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3), pp.277~287 (2016)
  43. Park, K., "A case study on pedagogical content knowledge(PCK)search and instructional practice of two novice high school science teachers", Journal of Research in Curriculum &Instruction, 22(5), pp.293~304 (2018)
  44. Qian, G., "Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’learning science concepts from text", Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), pp.282~292 (1995)
  45. Richardson, V., "Handbook of research on teacher education", pp.102~119 (1996), Macmillan
  46. Seo, S., "Exploration on teaching and learning experiences improving positive experiences about science of scientifically-gifted elementary school students", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(2), pp.133~144 (2021)
  47. Shin, C., "A study on science teaching orientation and PCK components as they appeared in science lessons by an experienced elementary teacher : Focusing on ‘motion of objects’ and ‘light and lens’", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(2), pp.155~169 (2021)
  48. Son, J., "Development and Understanding of Identification Tools for Elementary Science-Gifted Students" (2009), Bookshill
  49. Song, S., "Analysis on the science subject competencies in inquiry activity of elementary science textbooks according to 2015revised national curriculum", Biology Education, 48(1), pp.1~9 (2020)
  50. Watters, J. J., "The gifted student in science : Fulfilling potential", Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49(3), pp.46~53 (2003)
  51. Wright, E. L., "Stirring the biology teaching pot with discrepant events", The American Biology Teacher, 54(4), pp.205~210 (1992)
  52. Yoon, H., "Elementary teachers’ dilemmas of teaching science practical work", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(2), pp.102~116 (2008)
  53. Yoon, H., "What do pre-service elementary teachers learn from inquiry into science class dilemmas?", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(2), pp.338~355 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)